It's a very, very common act of right-wing deceit to accuse a quote of being selectively edited, taken out of context or otherwise "misrepresented," but to then fail to provide the context or the quote in its original form.

[i am compelled by my strong sense of professional ethics to point out that while the preceding skeet is allegory, it is not –to the best of my judgment upon reviewing the source material– in any additional way hyperbole, or an exaggeration of the real circumstances]

still no? well, here's a self-refereed literature review in an oecd ai anthology written by an ea think tank that largely plagiarizes an article from 2020 and cites jay bhattacharya's opinion that the primary barrier to pissdrinking adoption is scientists refusing to cite pro-piss research.

I won’t go as far as to say YT is deliberately trying to go after critics of gambling. That’s too clever a ploy for the dumbasses who pretend to run that site.

It’s just a result of lazy morons relying on automation, who think key words are worse than the meaning or context of those words.

YouTube, by the by, earns money from gambling, as it runs fucking ads for gambling sites!

As I said in a previous video, you can communicate any fucked up thing you like on YT so long as you don’t use the no-no words.

This honestly might be the most pathetic thing YT’s done to me.

This is a perfect example of how YouTube is forcing people to inhibit language, disarm words, and kill context.

Gambling games DO NOT LIKE the word gambling. They do not use it. That is WHY their critics use the fucking word. To take the word away only *helps* those who profit from gambling

sorry. a bunch of really stupid guys with a bunch of money who think they're smart got in a group chat together and started sharing facebook memes and now the government has decided curing cancer is not only not a priority, it's actually bad