Cruz, Hegseth, Karlan!

Yeah well I cheated on all my logic exams and I'm bad at reconstructing arguments. And I have no idea what the relationship between those two things are, because of the aforementioned cheating

If you can't tell, it's a holiday break in the US and I'm Playing Video Games™️

You should use Gemini, it looks like it understands you

Deleuzeans have the same thought when you post screenshots of their guy

(Grue)
(Bleen)

I too would not judge you if you were living on the moon, that is none of my business

Basic thought: even if you think aesthetic truths are mind dependent, they aren't dependent on any particular person's ("you") mind

THATS RIGHT YALL ITS A GIDEON ROSEN (1994) REFERENCE—EXACTLY WHAT THE PEOPLE CRAVE

Social constructivists distinguish between "this thing is true because people believe it" and "this thing is true because I specifically believe it" challenge (impossible)

The funniest thing is, unless you're a radical anti-realist, even moral and aesthetic truths are probably true no matter what you (specifically) believe, while, unless you're a radical pessimistic meta-induction skeptic, you should just think most scientific claims aren't truths at all!

Take note, Michigan/Ohio State/Wisconsin/Bowdoin/Rice/South Carolina/Tampa!!