Oca sapiens
@ocasapiens.bsky.social
Sylvie Coyaud, retired science reporter, not sapiens yet.
[which *is*], pardon...
December 9, 2025 at 11:13 AM
[which *is*], pardon...
*recensiscono*, pardon
December 6, 2025 at 11:08 AM
*recensiscono*, pardon
Not really
A French company, E-Space filed a 337,320-satellite constellation through Rwanda where fees are lower.
A French company, E-Space filed a 337,320-satellite constellation through Rwanda where fees are lower.
December 4, 2025 at 1:34 PM
Not really
A French company, E-Space filed a 337,320-satellite constellation through Rwanda where fees are lower.
A French company, E-Space filed a 337,320-satellite constellation through Rwanda where fees are lower.
Opinions are free, but Garland was a centrist Democrat, neither a Republican nor a Federalist Society-sponsored "activist" judge.
Judges' job is to uphold the rule of law, not to save democracy when voters refuse to or don't care.
Judges' job is to uphold the rule of law, not to save democracy when voters refuse to or don't care.
December 3, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Opinions are free, but Garland was a centrist Democrat, neither a Republican nor a Federalist Society-sponsored "activist" judge.
Judges' job is to uphold the rule of law, not to save democracy when voters refuse to or don't care.
Judges' job is to uphold the rule of law, not to save democracy when voters refuse to or don't care.
Whatever Garland was, it doesn't change the fact he released the first batch of Epstein files in Jan. 2024 and that media reported about them for weeks
www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...
nor judge Engelmayer's decision to keep grand juries' files under seal.
www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...
nor judge Engelmayer's decision to keep grand juries' files under seal.
Judge won't unseal transcripts of grand jury that indicted Epstein ex-girlfriend Maxwell
The judge says releasing the transcripts would risk unraveling the foundations of secrecy upon which the grand jury is premised.
www.pbs.org
December 3, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Whatever Garland was, it doesn't change the fact he released the first batch of Epstein files in Jan. 2024 and that media reported about them for weeks
www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...
nor judge Engelmayer's decision to keep grand juries' files under seal.
www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...
nor judge Engelmayer's decision to keep grand juries' files under seal.
?
Garland released the first batch of Epstein files in Jan. 2024. Those linked to Ghislaine Maxwell's prosecution were under seal during her trials, and SCOTUS only rejected her appeal two months ago.
Garland released the first batch of Epstein files in Jan. 2024. Those linked to Ghislaine Maxwell's prosecution were under seal during her trials, and SCOTUS only rejected her appeal two months ago.
December 3, 2025 at 8:13 PM
?
Garland released the first batch of Epstein files in Jan. 2024. Those linked to Ghislaine Maxwell's prosecution were under seal during her trials, and SCOTUS only rejected her appeal two months ago.
Garland released the first batch of Epstein files in Jan. 2024. Those linked to Ghislaine Maxwell's prosecution were under seal during her trials, and SCOTUS only rejected her appeal two months ago.
En fait, l'article explique qu'une association de patrons ❄️ a porté plainte, la mise en examen est automatique.
December 2, 2025 at 6:55 PM
En fait, l'article explique qu'une association de patrons ❄️ a porté plainte, la mise en examen est automatique.
En fait l'article est correct. Binet se défend bien tandis que la présidente de "l'association patronale Ethic" - qui a porté plainte - chouine comme si Binet lui avait écrasé une douzaine d'🥚 sur le crâne.
December 2, 2025 at 6:42 PM
En fait l'article est correct. Binet se défend bien tandis que la présidente de "l'association patronale Ethic" - qui a porté plainte - chouine comme si Binet lui avait écrasé une douzaine d'🥚 sur le crâne.