NewportWonk
@newportwonk.bsky.social
Views are entirely own +anti-racist, anti-bigotry, pro: #democracy, US #Constitution + #ruleoflaw
Reposted by NewportWonk
4/ Also why is Bradley saying they were not visibly injured but were still on the list of approved targets.
Hors de combat is hors de combat. List doesn't affect that.
WWII Germans could have a list of American soldiers who can be killed. But if they're shipwrecked, killing them is a war crime.
Hors de combat is hors de combat. List doesn't affect that.
WWII Germans could have a list of American soldiers who can be killed. But if they're shipwrecked, killing them is a war crime.
December 7, 2025 at 2:27 AM
4/ Also why is Bradley saying they were not visibly injured but were still on the list of approved targets.
Hors de combat is hors de combat. List doesn't affect that.
WWII Germans could have a list of American soldiers who can be killed. But if they're shipwrecked, killing them is a war crime.
Hors de combat is hors de combat. List doesn't affect that.
WWII Germans could have a list of American soldiers who can be killed. But if they're shipwrecked, killing them is a war crime.
Reposted by NewportWonk
[V3cam] Kīlauea volcano, Hawaii (south Halemaʻumaʻu crater)
YouTube video by USGS
www.youtube.com
December 7, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Reposted by NewportWonk
8/ A public service reminder:
This entire exercise is an absurd, imaginary world for legal experts.
That's because the truth is:
It's not an armed conflict.
The laws of war thus don't apply.
The more restrictive rules of human rights apply.
It's extrajudicial killing under that law.
This entire exercise is an absurd, imaginary world for legal experts.
That's because the truth is:
It's not an armed conflict.
The laws of war thus don't apply.
The more restrictive rules of human rights apply.
It's extrajudicial killing under that law.
December 4, 2025 at 2:34 AM
8/ A public service reminder:
This entire exercise is an absurd, imaginary world for legal experts.
That's because the truth is:
It's not an armed conflict.
The laws of war thus don't apply.
The more restrictive rules of human rights apply.
It's extrajudicial killing under that law.
This entire exercise is an absurd, imaginary world for legal experts.
That's because the truth is:
It's not an armed conflict.
The laws of war thus don't apply.
The more restrictive rules of human rights apply.
It's extrajudicial killing under that law.