I cannot tell you how much it means to me, as a trans woman and at the moment, to know that 65,000 cis women have our backs.

It can be hard to remember, but it's wonderful when I do. Thank you all.

I still look okay for my age then.

You take that at face value, figures.

I believe it's being used for segregation, ideological in a western context. The UK exported prudery and prurience around the globe, some destinations never evolved much thereafter and some countries weaponise against electoral opponents using this still. Arguably that's what happened here 2015 ish.

Perhaps listen to the podcast particularly about being awoken to this. I know nothing of her principles, nor I feel, can you say with any certainty. If it's bigoted to want all people to accept one another as decent people much the same as their neighbours then I guess you've clarified something.

Crowdfunders are the great giveaway - completely opaque funds sources (hired drones etc) and absolutely no accountability or comeback on how funds accrued are used. Whilst I acknowledge they've probably done a lot of individual good, I cannot avoid the darker money transferring they can facilitate.

#NormanSpack [retired Head of #BostonClinic & #ConsultingEndocrinologist) advised circa 2013 - he was frequently called in to help determine sex when simple observation isn't up to it. Not everyone is "physically complete" internally for whatever reason. I prefer "people just are & I accept them".

Gullibility has nothing to do with it, the #SPLC identified a "call to action" circa 2017 - for that anti trans warfare she speaks of. In that respect she seems to have signed up to call up. The bigger game of course is breaking up the strength of the #LGBTiQ+ body as we see now with Equal Marriage.

Looking back at the totality of #LGBAlliance thuggery including those who kick still occasionally; "just to keep their hand in" untruths and chronic misrepresentation is a baseline beat.

🙏✊️💐

Thinking @mimmymum.bsky.social @dadtrans.bsky.social and the like random suggestions 🙏

Having watched it, I reckon if BBC agree to a strictly "sound only" [to protect the parents kids] right of response; Mr #MartinGeissler might give a fair hearing to a couple of trans kids parents getting their opportunity to give hitherto hidden/suppressed perspective. No GC being present essential.

I was fairly dumbfounded by that statement. I'm sure the SC judges wouldn't have been impressed by it; giving their game away.

Or the more craven "there's money for the taking there" who knows?

Perhaps the reply was this one - don't know.

"because the American far right poured a lot of money into attacking trans rights as an open to attacking LGBT rights as a whole, and the entire gender critical grift is viciously anti LGBT to boot?"