Would love to understand this as well, hope this gets shared publicly.

Petition against this nonsense: weplanet.yourmovement.org/p/noconfusio...

@bartdhondt.bsky.social kan dit per direct de nieuwe partijlijn voor Groen worden? 😉

Prachtige tekst, ik hoop dat Groen als partij deze lijn gaat volgen.

Minder dan 5 ingrediënten is gezond?

Wie verzint deze onzin?

Ik kan hem niet lezen, maar ik vermoed dat de mensen "die het gevaar niet willen onderschatten" het gevaar weer massaal aan het overschatten zijn?

To be clear, these authors do not think that UPF consumption actually increases your chance of dying from an accident.

This analysis helps the authors to see if something outside of UPF consumption is influencing their results. Which clearly is the case here.

Great episode! Especially near the end where we can see a hint of a small ideological difference between you and @marklynas.bsky.social (regarding plant-based eating and flying). I'm in camp Ritchie on those issues, but would love to see this explored further.

Een van de vele legendarische Miyazaki momenten. Held.

Yes, but I feel like the propaganda from the livestock industry is better understood, at least in scientific circles. For example, Our World in Data doesn't use any livestock propaganda that I'm aware of, but still presents the MSY concept from the fishing industry as scientific.