Marijn Raeven
banner
mraeven.bsky.social
Marijn Raeven
@mraeven.bsky.social
200 followers 540 following 100 posts
Environmental animator / science enthusiast. Mostly posts on agriculture/nutrition. My work: www.raeven.be
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
New animation:

🌍 What will we eat in 2050?

A brief overview of the challenges our global food system faces, and what we can do to address these issues.

Watch on youtube: youtu.be/o2atI8PSLYQ
Would love to understand this as well, hope this gets shared publicly.
Reposted by Marijn Raeven
The EAT-Lancet report shook things up in 2019 by putting food systems at the heart of climate and health. Now it’s back. The 2025 update sharpens the science, adjusts where needed, and adds a crucial layer: social justice.

Our breakdown of the report. 👇
EAT-Lancet 2025: solid science, but will we bite?
“Scientists say we need to eat less meat!” We’ve all seen headlines like this over the years. And if you saw one recently, it was likely based on the 2025 EAT-Lancet report.
open.substack.com
Bye bye veggie burgers?

Ridiculous government overreach and policing of language, all thanks to the meat lobby.

www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pres...
Reposted by Marijn Raeven
Please sign and share this, particularly if you're a European citizen. What Brussels is proposing is both damaging and incredibly dumb, and the European Parliament is about to vote (on 8 October) on an amendment to make it even worse! Please do sign 🙏
weplanet.yourmovement.org/p/noconfusio...
Stop the EU’s Ban on “Meaty” Words for Plant-Based Foods
Sign now
weplanet.yourmovement.org
Reposted by Marijn Raeven
Exactly. Your tofu is not driving deforestation in the Amazon. If anything, eating more soy products directly (and eating fewer animals that eat soy as feed) would *reduce* overall demand for soybeans and pressure on tropical forests.
Soybeans are overwhelming used for feed. 80% of protein produced on Brazil's croplands is used to feed animals iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1....
The recent tariff issue is a prime example of how the world's taste for meat (not soy) is shaping distant landscapes. www.theguardian.com/global-devel...
How the world’s taste for soya is eating Brazil’s Amazon
Cultivation of the crop has made a few wealthy but at a huge cost to untouched forest as it spreads across vast areas of former wilderness
www.theguardian.com
Meat vs EAT-Lancet - 🥩🌱 - interesting report.

Expecting another massive anti EAT-Lancet campaign when the 2025 update drops next week.

changingmarkets.org/report/meat-...
@bartdhondt.bsky.social kan dit per direct de nieuwe partijlijn voor Groen worden? 😉
Sterke tekst over hoe een moderne groene partij zich zou moeten positioneren.

Hopelijk gaan we dit terug zien in de praktijk. 🤞
Dit academiejaar werd ik als non-academic mentor gekoppeld aan Ebru Akgün een doctoraatsstudent van UAntwerpen / VUB.

Deze boeiende uitwisseling leidde tot een tekst over hoe het #ecologisme meer mensen kan meekrijgen in de #klimaattransitie

Dank @sampolmaandblad.bsky.social om te publiceren!
Hoe het ecologisme meer mensen kan aanspreken
Groene partijen staan vandaag vooral in de verdediging. Het is tijd om het klimaatverhaal te herschrijven, zodat meer mensen de noodzakelijke klimaattransitie steunen.
www.sampol.be
Prachtige tekst, ik hoop dat Groen als partij deze lijn gaat volgen.
Reposted by Marijn Raeven
Billions of animals are tortured for meat each year. Millions of slaughterhouse workers suffer too -- physically and mentally: www.vox.com/future-perfe...

This quote really stands out: “Public demand for meat creates ongoing, present, and future exposure to trauma and continual retraumatization.”
What slaughtering animals all day does to your mind
The meat industry has a PTSD problem.
www.vox.com
"If we killed every deer in the UK, it could maybe supply 1% of our meat consumption — or three days’ worth of meat."

Unmasking bad ideas around sustainable food production is often easy - just ask the question:

"How does it scale?"

substack.com/home/post/p-...
Eating wild animals might be sustainable for the few, but not for the many
Some back-of-the-envelope calculations on how many it could feed.
substack.com
Minder dan 5 ingrediënten is gezond?

Wie verzint deze onzin?
Ik kan hem niet lezen, maar ik vermoed dat de mensen "die het gevaar niet willen onderschatten" het gevaar weer massaal aan het overschatten zijn?
To be clear, these authors do not think that UPF consumption actually increases your chance of dying from an accident.

This analysis helps the authors to see if something outside of UPF consumption is influencing their results. Which clearly is the case here.
I'm seeing a lot of "Ultra-processed food increases risk of early death" headlines again.

Did you know that UPF consumption also has a positive association with accidental deaths?

Source: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Reposted by Marijn Raeven
The Keto-CTA paper brouhaha is small potatoes compared to a crumbling democracy, but it demonstrates how people believe wrong stuff.

Cherry pick evidence
Manipulate data
Hang out in your silo
Trust your gut

That's how we get RFK Jr, as well as folks who think high LDL is OK as long as it's keto.
Reposted by Marijn Raeven
In this one, plant protein was more reliably associated with a reduction in frailty.

Summary & commentary 🧵👇
Great episode! Especially near the end where we can see a hint of a small ideological difference between you and @marklynas.bsky.social (regarding plant-based eating and flying). I'm in camp Ritchie on those issues, but would love to see this explored further.
Een van de vele legendarische Miyazaki momenten. Held.
Yes, but I feel like the propaganda from the livestock industry is better understood, at least in scientific circles. For example, Our World in Data doesn't use any livestock propaganda that I'm aware of, but still presents the MSY concept from the fishing industry as scientific.
Highly recommend reading this piece. The pseudoscience around sustainable fishing is quite shocking, and doesn't get much attention.

Also, follow Spencer.
We have been lied to by the fishing industry.

I believe this is one of the great scandals of our age, comparable to oil corporations’ denial of climate change.

Global fishing regulations are based on a pseudoscience contrived to justify cutting the world’s fish populations in half.

my latest:
🌎🦑🧪
Fishing sustainability is based on a pseudoscientific theory that justifies taking the most marine life for maximum profit.
www.currentaffairs.org/news/sustain...