Slice of Fox
@michaelwi.bsky.social
I note bartosch’s evidence doesn’t actually contain any evidence. Instead relying on smearing the accuser.
November 29, 2025 at 11:23 AM
I note bartosch’s evidence doesn’t actually contain any evidence. Instead relying on smearing the accuser.
Ditto the American government
November 28, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Ditto the American government
In my mind it’s a reskin of amoung us.
November 28, 2025 at 5:59 PM
In my mind it’s a reskin of amoung us.
Oh dear god. Rage against the machine?
November 28, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Oh dear god. Rage against the machine?
Also why has he drawn himself looking like Louis Theroux instead of the lopsided monstrosity he actually looks like?
November 28, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Also why has he drawn himself looking like Louis Theroux instead of the lopsided monstrosity he actually looks like?
The idiot made it look like his quote was urging us to hit glinner in the balls.
I could very much see that tshirt being more a pro-trans protest one in the end.
I could very much see that tshirt being more a pro-trans protest one in the end.
November 28, 2025 at 5:09 PM
The idiot made it look like his quote was urging us to hit glinner in the balls.
I could very much see that tshirt being more a pro-trans protest one in the end.
I could very much see that tshirt being more a pro-trans protest one in the end.
Reposted by Slice of Fox
In fact, two days with Graham has probably turned the journalist in to one of those darned "trans activists" we're always been told are everywhere. The bit at the end of the article where Graham is using ChatGPT to build a trans fetish videogame is really something.
November 27, 2025 at 11:12 PM
In fact, two days with Graham has probably turned the journalist in to one of those darned "trans activists" we're always been told are everywhere. The bit at the end of the article where Graham is using ChatGPT to build a trans fetish videogame is really something.
Bev thinking child safeguarding is defending someone who destroyed a child’s property after attacking that child.
November 27, 2025 at 5:03 PM
Bev thinking child safeguarding is defending someone who destroyed a child’s property after attacking that child.
Labour even as part of their civil partnerships legislation didn’t protect LGBT not just make provision for people to ignore it through loopholes but explicitly legislated to ban the CofE from being able to perform civil partnerships should they decide they wanted to.
November 27, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Labour even as part of their civil partnerships legislation didn’t protect LGBT not just make provision for people to ignore it through loopholes but explicitly legislated to ban the CofE from being able to perform civil partnerships should they decide they wanted to.
Yes. Lgbt were not included as full protected characteristics until Lynn featherstone’s update in 2010.
Labour brought in separate but equal civil partnerships but failed to provide equality there. Instead preferring to provide multiple exclusions to pander to homophobes.
Labour brought in separate but equal civil partnerships but failed to provide equality there. Instead preferring to provide multiple exclusions to pander to homophobes.
November 27, 2025 at 4:07 PM
Yes. Lgbt were not included as full protected characteristics until Lynn featherstone’s update in 2010.
Labour brought in separate but equal civil partnerships but failed to provide equality there. Instead preferring to provide multiple exclusions to pander to homophobes.
Labour brought in separate but equal civil partnerships but failed to provide equality there. Instead preferring to provide multiple exclusions to pander to homophobes.
Disgusting irony for Labour Together to advocate for segregation.
November 27, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Disgusting irony for Labour Together to advocate for segregation.
And shall I remind you that the Labour version of the equality act (2006) didn’t protect lgbt people?
They were covered under the Lib Dem version in 2010.
They were covered under the Lib Dem version in 2010.
November 27, 2025 at 1:24 PM
And shall I remind you that the Labour version of the equality act (2006) didn’t protect lgbt people?
They were covered under the Lib Dem version in 2010.
They were covered under the Lib Dem version in 2010.
The Labour Party membership isn’t. The parliamentary labour party is under starmer’s leadership.
This is the person who obtained a red flag watch warning for genocidal intent from the leading international genocide protection organisation due to starmer’s statements about lgbt people.
This is the person who obtained a red flag watch warning for genocidal intent from the leading international genocide protection organisation due to starmer’s statements about lgbt people.
November 27, 2025 at 1:20 PM
The Labour Party membership isn’t. The parliamentary labour party is under starmer’s leadership.
This is the person who obtained a red flag watch warning for genocidal intent from the leading international genocide protection organisation due to starmer’s statements about lgbt people.
This is the person who obtained a red flag watch warning for genocidal intent from the leading international genocide protection organisation due to starmer’s statements about lgbt people.
It’s not about what makes me feels better. It’s about challenging lies you’re attempting to white wash labours abysmal decisions.
November 27, 2025 at 1:03 PM
It’s not about what makes me feels better. It’s about challenging lies you’re attempting to white wash labours abysmal decisions.
Reposted by Slice of Fox
He's perfectly happy for trans folk to be beaten up though.
Or murdered.
We had the measure of him when Brianna was killed.😡
Or murdered.
We had the measure of him when Brianna was killed.😡
November 26, 2025 at 11:27 PM
He's perfectly happy for trans folk to be beaten up though.
Or murdered.
We had the measure of him when Brianna was killed.😡
Or murdered.
We had the measure of him when Brianna was killed.😡
Maybe try saying that to people who aren’t lgbt. We don’t support anti-lgbt parties.
November 27, 2025 at 12:41 PM
Maybe try saying that to people who aren’t lgbt. We don’t support anti-lgbt parties.
The good here is the greens forcing Labour to take those abandoning them seriously for once.
It’s too little too late from Labour.
It’s too little too late from Labour.
November 27, 2025 at 12:33 PM
The good here is the greens forcing Labour to take those abandoning them seriously for once.
It’s too little too late from Labour.
It’s too little too late from Labour.
Labour MPs were whipped into supporting keeping it just last year.
The reversing approach is self interest. Don’t pretend this in anyway because it’s the right thing. It’s because they’ve been shamed into it and because their base has left for the greens.
The reversing approach is self interest. Don’t pretend this in anyway because it’s the right thing. It’s because they’ve been shamed into it and because their base has left for the greens.
November 27, 2025 at 12:32 PM
Labour MPs were whipped into supporting keeping it just last year.
The reversing approach is self interest. Don’t pretend this in anyway because it’s the right thing. It’s because they’ve been shamed into it and because their base has left for the greens.
The reversing approach is self interest. Don’t pretend this in anyway because it’s the right thing. It’s because they’ve been shamed into it and because their base has left for the greens.
Correct. It was only a month or two ago he publicly criticised the police even investigating anti-lgbt hate crimes when he intervened about linehan.
November 27, 2025 at 11:10 AM
Correct. It was only a month or two ago he publicly criticised the police even investigating anti-lgbt hate crimes when he intervened about linehan.
Also if we look at it more generally just in recent months starmer (not not just random doctor) waded in to argue that lgbt people should not be protected in law from targeted harassment when he criticised Graeme linehan’s arrest and investigation.
November 27, 2025 at 9:10 AM
Also if we look at it more generally just in recent months starmer (not not just random doctor) waded in to argue that lgbt people should not be protected in law from targeted harassment when he criticised Graeme linehan’s arrest and investigation.
However those in the lgbt community did not forget about starmers part in stoking anti-trans and anti-lgbt hatred.
As demonstrated by this clip from Brianna’s vigil:
youtube.com/shorts/C6WSM...
As demonstrated by this clip from Brianna’s vigil:
youtube.com/shorts/C6WSM...
"Fuck Keir Starmer" outside a vigil for Brianna Ghey
YouTube video by Activist.Videos
youtube.com
November 27, 2025 at 9:08 AM
However those in the lgbt community did not forget about starmers part in stoking anti-trans and anti-lgbt hatred.
As demonstrated by this clip from Brianna’s vigil:
youtube.com/shorts/C6WSM...
As demonstrated by this clip from Brianna’s vigil:
youtube.com/shorts/C6WSM...
Starmer concluded it was appropriate to disrespect the hypothetical trans person in death in interviews with mums net.
Then a dead underage trans girl captured the nations attention and he hoped people would forget what he said. So he went performative on sunak. Despite Starmer saying worse.
Then a dead underage trans girl captured the nations attention and he hoped people would forget what he said. So he went performative on sunak. Despite Starmer saying worse.
November 27, 2025 at 9:06 AM
Starmer concluded it was appropriate to disrespect the hypothetical trans person in death in interviews with mums net.
Then a dead underage trans girl captured the nations attention and he hoped people would forget what he said. So he went performative on sunak. Despite Starmer saying worse.
Then a dead underage trans girl captured the nations attention and he hoped people would forget what he said. So he went performative on sunak. Despite Starmer saying worse.
Worth noting about Brianna ghey that coming up to her death labour (and in particular Starmer) got involved in the transphobe side of the GRC reform plans in Scotland.
An instance of a dead underage trans person without a GRC was raised and whether it was respectful to misgender in death.
An instance of a dead underage trans person without a GRC was raised and whether it was respectful to misgender in death.
November 27, 2025 at 9:03 AM
Worth noting about Brianna ghey that coming up to her death labour (and in particular Starmer) got involved in the transphobe side of the GRC reform plans in Scotland.
An instance of a dead underage trans person without a GRC was raised and whether it was respectful to misgender in death.
An instance of a dead underage trans person without a GRC was raised and whether it was respectful to misgender in death.