Matthieu Boisgontier
banner
matthieuboisgontier.com
Matthieu Boisgontier
@matthieuboisgontier.com
Associate Professor at @uOttawa.ca, Faculty of Health Sciences. all comments are my own. Contributing to @pci-hms.bsky.social & @cik.bsky.social. #OpenScience #Kin #PT 🇨🇦 www.linkedin.com/in/matthieuboisgontier
Postdoc (and PhD) opportunity in my lab. www.linkedin.com/posts/matthi...
November 23, 2025 at 5:33 PM
Should we also require open raw data & code for preprints? This would improve protection against AI-generated manuscripts. There should of course be exceptions for sensitive data, with justifications required.
November 16, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
A better approach is to build the capacity of presses in libraries, UPs, scholar-led pubs, overlays, etc. This will take money but will allow a better kind of publishing to flourish in places that need it, so you'll change the argument from being about cost-saving towards a more ethical ecosystem.
November 15, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
I’m not sure who needs to hear this but RCTs are a tool in our scientific tool kit. It’s a powerful tool but things “go wrong” in RCTs with randomization, primary outcomes (yes you can do secondary analyses), intention to treat etc. RCTs, prospective, observational all have a role to play in science
November 15, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
A new ⭐ Editor's Choice ⭐ explores the complex relationships between depressive symptoms, pain, physical activity, and function in patients with arthritis.

academic.oup.com/ptj/advance-...
Validate User
academic.oup.com
November 12, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
New diamond open access journal Replication Research welcomes reports of replication of previous works. #academicchatter
https://www.uni-muenster.de/Ejournals/index.php/replicationresearch/index
Replication Research
Replication Research is a diamond open-access and researcher-led journal that publishes reproductions, replications, and conceptual articles on repetitive research
www.uni-muenster.de
November 12, 2025 at 9:54 AM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
So stimulating & such a pleasure to work w/ these geniuses. Took only 11 versions to get us all aligned and agree on one call to action to stop the drain.
What we all agreed on right away: this push needs to happen via strong funder and institutional policies w/out for-profit publisher interference
New preprint on the drain that for-profit publishers place on the scientific ecosystem. We also point out that, though it's often presented as a global problem, it's actually a Global North problem: there are parts of the world with strong diamond #OA non-profit alternatives arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
November 11, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
What is the most profitable industry in the world, this side of the law? Not oil, not IT, not pharma.

It's *scientific publishing*.

We call this the Drain of Scientific Publishing.

Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
Background: doi.org/10.1162/qss_...

Thread @markhanson.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy 👇
November 12, 2025 at 10:31 AM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
Youyou Tu's work on anti-malarial compounds that saved millions of lives (w/Nobel+Lasker recognition) wins the low citation/huge impact cell. The original paper has 87 citations as of today: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11721477/ Hopefully she can get to 100.

What for huge citations and moderate impact?
November 8, 2025 at 12:31 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
«Pourquoi l'économie de l'édition scientifique a besoin d'une réforme urgente»

📚Ce texte de @stefhaustein.scholcommlab.ca souligne les travers du modèle économique de la publication savante et propose 13 mesures pour y remédier.

📌 shorturl.at/g5Zel

#ScholCommLab #ScholComm #ScholarlyPublishing
November 3, 2025 at 5:05 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
i agree. Problem is that peer review is not geared up for detection of fabricated data. Sadly I think we need to be more alert to this. Inclusion of raw data v helpful in this case - and the discrepancies in age hit you as soon as you open the file. But deposited data should be .csv! @bmj.com
November 3, 2025 at 7:44 AM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
"Sustaining openness in an age of industrial-scale extraction may require new economic and governance models...it may be useful to consider historical precedent [like] governance of biological resources [from] indigenous communities" sverhulst.medium.com/the-weaponis...
The Weaponisation of Openness? Toward a New Social Contract for Data in the AI Era
By Stefaan G. Verhulst
sverhulst.medium.com
November 3, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
The first paper ('the DAG review') was an epic meta-scientific review of 200+ papers. Started in 2017 and finally accepted in 2020, the paper was conceived as a way to develop recommendations on the design and reporting of DAGs.

academic.oup.com/ije/article/...
Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations
AbstractBackground. Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are an increasingly popular approach for identifying confounding variables that require conditioning whe
academic.oup.com
November 3, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
Nature Communications will publish ~10K papers in 2025 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov?term=%22Natu...

That's ~$70M in revenue, while many of the non-profit journals that used to occupy that slot in the journal hierarchy have seen a precipitous decline in submissions in the 15 years it's existed.
October 27, 2025 at 8:38 PM
"55% had been asked to referee a manuscript they were not competent to critique. Surprisingly, more than 1/3 still submitted a peer review." journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1...
October 26, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
Free data resources in science are having the shit mined out of them to produce X,000's of bullshit papers.

What should we do?

(Warning: I sat on this draft for too long, and publishers are already doing some of it. That's what I get for engaging with the news.)

open.substack.com/pub/jamescla...
How To Stop The Next 10,000 Bullshit Papers
Some remarkably un-radical proposals
open.substack.com
October 9, 2025 at 2:43 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
Last Friday, we published the 500th article of Peer Community Journal! 🥳
September 29, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
My article "Data is not available upon request" was published in Meta-Psychology. Very happy to see this out!
open.lnu.se/index.php/me...
LnuOpen | Meta-Psychology
open.lnu.se
October 4, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
I wouldn’t normally endorse AI prompts but these are indeed essential for all academics.
October 5, 2025 at 10:13 AM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
The Department of Kinesiology at Penn State is inviting applications for an open-rank faculty position in sensorimotor control and rehabilitation neuroscience. Please share this opportunity with interested colleagues in your network.

psu.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/PSU_Academic...
Open-Rank Faculty Position in Sensorimotor Control and Rehabilitation Neuroscience
APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS: CURRENT PENN STATE EMPLOYEE (faculty, staff, technical service, or student), please login to Workday to complete the internal application process. Please do not apply here, a...
psu.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com
October 1, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
We need good practices for DOI registration for publish-review-curate platforms like @metaror.bsky.social and others.

@andre-brasil.bsky.social and I wrote a blog post about this: doi.org/10.64000/76j...

Together with @crossref.bsky.social we hope to receive input from the community on this issue!
Innovation in scientific publishing and its implications for Crossref DOI registration practices - Request for input - Crossref
Lots of exciting innovations are being made in scientific publishing, often raising fundamental questions about established publishing practices. In this guest post, Ludo Waltman and André Brasil disc...
doi.org
September 26, 2025 at 6:47 AM
Replicability and transparency in physical therapy research: Time to wake up! doi.org/10.1101/2025...
September 25, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Reposted by Matthieu Boisgontier
Yesterday, we had the pleasure of listening to Dorothy Bishop emphasize the responsibility of editors during the 12th PCI Webinar! If you weren't able to join, you can catch her talk and the following Q&A session at this link: https://youtu.be/0NJ87tYE8_s
September 19, 2025 at 1:34 PM
Rethinking where and how we publish in health sciences doi.org/10.51224/SRX...
August 20, 2025 at 11:01 AM