Leftist Logician (she/her)
@leftistlogician.bsky.social
Warren and Crockett fangirl, proud Bay Stater.
If you need to be persuaded to vote out Republicans, you don't really hate fascism.
If you can't handle being told to be a decent person, you need medication.
100% geek and caretaker when not politics-ing.
If you need to be persuaded to vote out Republicans, you don't really hate fascism.
If you can't handle being told to be a decent person, you need medication.
100% geek and caretaker when not politics-ing.
Dude, wat
November 22, 2025 at 2:12 AM
Dude, wat
No, because the American public let the right get that powerful.
November 22, 2025 at 12:00 AM
No, because the American public let the right get that powerful.
This person is a prime example of the real reason Democrats lost: Americans are just living off in delusional land.
Like.
"He wasn't fit for the job"
Reality, see pic.
"Do you actually think hard empirical facts are what decide elections?"
No, and the fact they don't *is our entire problem*.
Like.
"He wasn't fit for the job"
Reality, see pic.
"Do you actually think hard empirical facts are what decide elections?"
No, and the fact they don't *is our entire problem*.
November 21, 2025 at 11:41 PM
This person is a prime example of the real reason Democrats lost: Americans are just living off in delusional land.
Like.
"He wasn't fit for the job"
Reality, see pic.
"Do you actually think hard empirical facts are what decide elections?"
No, and the fact they don't *is our entire problem*.
Like.
"He wasn't fit for the job"
Reality, see pic.
"Do you actually think hard empirical facts are what decide elections?"
No, and the fact they don't *is our entire problem*.
"He hurt the party’s reputation at a crucial moment."
Which wouldn't have happened had people moved to debunk the various incorrect or intentionally false claims.
"There’s no hard empirical facts that can change that."
You already know they would have, and did, for people who knew them.
Which wouldn't have happened had people moved to debunk the various incorrect or intentionally false claims.
"There’s no hard empirical facts that can change that."
You already know they would have, and did, for people who knew them.
November 21, 2025 at 11:24 PM
"He hurt the party’s reputation at a crucial moment."
Which wouldn't have happened had people moved to debunk the various incorrect or intentionally false claims.
"There’s no hard empirical facts that can change that."
You already know they would have, and did, for people who knew them.
Which wouldn't have happened had people moved to debunk the various incorrect or intentionally false claims.
"There’s no hard empirical facts that can change that."
You already know they would have, and did, for people who knew them.
"He wasn’t fit for the job"
November 21, 2025 at 11:14 PM
"He wasn’t fit for the job"
Today's clinically insane takes from far leftists.
For context, I was arguing the problem in 2024 was that since Biden did an objectively good job and Americans denied all the facts, it would have been better for Dems to reinforce the facts versus making it so only a liar or idiot could have won.
For context, I was arguing the problem in 2024 was that since Biden did an objectively good job and Americans denied all the facts, it would have been better for Dems to reinforce the facts versus making it so only a liar or idiot could have won.
November 21, 2025 at 9:28 PM
Today's clinically insane takes from far leftists.
For context, I was arguing the problem in 2024 was that since Biden did an objectively good job and Americans denied all the facts, it would have been better for Dems to reinforce the facts versus making it so only a liar or idiot could have won.
For context, I was arguing the problem in 2024 was that since Biden did an objectively good job and Americans denied all the facts, it would have been better for Dems to reinforce the facts versus making it so only a liar or idiot could have won.
"We’re not going to agree whether Americans or a minority of Democrat Jucheists were the delusional ones here"
The so-called "Democrat Jucheists" were empirically factually correct, FYI.
The so-called "Democrat Jucheists" were empirically factually correct, FYI.
November 21, 2025 at 9:21 PM
"We’re not going to agree whether Americans or a minority of Democrat Jucheists were the delusional ones here"
The so-called "Democrat Jucheists" were empirically factually correct, FYI.
The so-called "Democrat Jucheists" were empirically factually correct, FYI.
This just kinda tells me a lot, that these people who supposedly don't pay attention to politics tip strongly Republican.
November 21, 2025 at 1:32 PM
This just kinda tells me a lot, that these people who supposedly don't pay attention to politics tip strongly Republican.
More creepy harasser behavior where people do abusive safety-controls dodging.
I take it back, apparently he is a troll. Who should have stuck to blogging about web programming.
I take it back, apparently he is a troll. Who should have stuck to blogging about web programming.
November 20, 2025 at 8:57 PM
More creepy harasser behavior where people do abusive safety-controls dodging.
I take it back, apparently he is a troll. Who should have stuck to blogging about web programming.
I take it back, apparently he is a troll. Who should have stuck to blogging about web programming.
"You only have two parties. You want to wait for a bipartisan alliance?"
No I want a supermajority of the one halfway decent party.
"Or grassroots change to be channeled into political action how"
Voting out Republicans and refusing to vote for them again until they moderate into being non-evil.
No I want a supermajority of the one halfway decent party.
"Or grassroots change to be channeled into political action how"
Voting out Republicans and refusing to vote for them again until they moderate into being non-evil.
November 20, 2025 at 8:08 PM
"You only have two parties. You want to wait for a bipartisan alliance?"
No I want a supermajority of the one halfway decent party.
"Or grassroots change to be channeled into political action how"
Voting out Republicans and refusing to vote for them again until they moderate into being non-evil.
No I want a supermajority of the one halfway decent party.
"Or grassroots change to be channeled into political action how"
Voting out Republicans and refusing to vote for them again until they moderate into being non-evil.
"If you think people emerged from the Biden presidency feeling life was so much better, then explain Trump."
What I actually think is the empirical facts showed things were better, and for some reason too many people refused to accept facts. It was wacko, I can't explain it, and it frustrates me.
What I actually think is the empirical facts showed things were better, and for some reason too many people refused to accept facts. It was wacko, I can't explain it, and it frustrates me.
November 20, 2025 at 7:49 PM
"If you think people emerged from the Biden presidency feeling life was so much better, then explain Trump."
What I actually think is the empirical facts showed things were better, and for some reason too many people refused to accept facts. It was wacko, I can't explain it, and it frustrates me.
What I actually think is the empirical facts showed things were better, and for some reason too many people refused to accept facts. It was wacko, I can't explain it, and it frustrates me.
"You need a reformist government"
Then people can stop voting for Republicans.
Because that's the actual real reason we don't get the things we want any more.
Then people can stop voting for Republicans.
Because that's the actual real reason we don't get the things we want any more.
November 20, 2025 at 7:49 PM
"You need a reformist government"
Then people can stop voting for Republicans.
Because that's the actual real reason we don't get the things we want any more.
Then people can stop voting for Republicans.
Because that's the actual real reason we don't get the things we want any more.
"utterly risible to the rest of the world that the richest nation on the planet has been unable to institute socialised healthcare."
And welcome to the actual real reasons why.
And welcome to the actual real reasons why.
November 20, 2025 at 7:43 PM
"utterly risible to the rest of the world that the richest nation on the planet has been unable to institute socialised healthcare."
And welcome to the actual real reasons why.
And welcome to the actual real reasons why.
"You're still running a post-Reagan neoliberal project"
Yes, that's what happens when you vote for Republicans and split government for most of my lifetime.
Yes, that's what happens when you vote for Republicans and split government for most of my lifetime.
November 20, 2025 at 7:42 PM
"You're still running a post-Reagan neoliberal project"
Yes, that's what happens when you vote for Republicans and split government for most of my lifetime.
Yes, that's what happens when you vote for Republicans and split government for most of my lifetime.
Yes, the article you linked certainly does exist.
November 18, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Yes, the article you linked certainly does exist.
"country would be materially better with voters seeing Republicans do bad things and Dems do good things."
Yeah, no shit, Sherlock.
So maybe, hear me out, we should actually give Democrats trifectas more often than only 2 years out of every 10 so they can actually do more good things.
Yeah, no shit, Sherlock.
So maybe, hear me out, we should actually give Democrats trifectas more often than only 2 years out of every 10 so they can actually do more good things.
November 18, 2025 at 9:46 PM
"country would be materially better with voters seeing Republicans do bad things and Dems do good things."
Yeah, no shit, Sherlock.
So maybe, hear me out, we should actually give Democrats trifectas more often than only 2 years out of every 10 so they can actually do more good things.
Yeah, no shit, Sherlock.
So maybe, hear me out, we should actually give Democrats trifectas more often than only 2 years out of every 10 so they can actually do more good things.
"he has imaginary conservative friends dictating his views"
Things that not only don't happen but you admit they don't happen.
"refuses to endorse fellow Democrats out of racism"
Things that don't happen.
"legislative strategy ranges from incoherent to capitulating"
Things that don't happen.
Things that not only don't happen but you admit they don't happen.
"refuses to endorse fellow Democrats out of racism"
Things that don't happen.
"legislative strategy ranges from incoherent to capitulating"
Things that don't happen.
November 18, 2025 at 9:35 PM
"he has imaginary conservative friends dictating his views"
Things that not only don't happen but you admit they don't happen.
"refuses to endorse fellow Democrats out of racism"
Things that don't happen.
"legislative strategy ranges from incoherent to capitulating"
Things that don't happen.
Things that not only don't happen but you admit they don't happen.
"refuses to endorse fellow Democrats out of racism"
Things that don't happen.
"legislative strategy ranges from incoherent to capitulating"
Things that don't happen.
Unironically this pic.
I recently saw credible pollsters find out Democrats are less popular than Republicans, and Schumer is less popular than Vance, Trump, and Johnson.
We have severe, severe Democrat Derangement Syndrome.
I recently saw credible pollsters find out Democrats are less popular than Republicans, and Schumer is less popular than Vance, Trump, and Johnson.
We have severe, severe Democrat Derangement Syndrome.
November 18, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Unironically this pic.
I recently saw credible pollsters find out Democrats are less popular than Republicans, and Schumer is less popular than Vance, Trump, and Johnson.
We have severe, severe Democrat Derangement Syndrome.
I recently saw credible pollsters find out Democrats are less popular than Republicans, and Schumer is less popular than Vance, Trump, and Johnson.
We have severe, severe Democrat Derangement Syndrome.
Democrat Derangement Syndrome and Murc's Law Brain, everyone.
Schumer is less popular than:
Party of cartoon supervillain fascists
The lead fascist
Leader's understudy
Mouth of Sauron for the leader
What did he do wrong? Not endorse someone and not do no-hoper votes. Worse than literal fascism.
Schumer is less popular than:
Party of cartoon supervillain fascists
The lead fascist
Leader's understudy
Mouth of Sauron for the leader
What did he do wrong? Not endorse someone and not do no-hoper votes. Worse than literal fascism.
November 18, 2025 at 12:38 PM
Democrat Derangement Syndrome and Murc's Law Brain, everyone.
Schumer is less popular than:
Party of cartoon supervillain fascists
The lead fascist
Leader's understudy
Mouth of Sauron for the leader
What did he do wrong? Not endorse someone and not do no-hoper votes. Worse than literal fascism.
Schumer is less popular than:
Party of cartoon supervillain fascists
The lead fascist
Leader's understudy
Mouth of Sauron for the leader
What did he do wrong? Not endorse someone and not do no-hoper votes. Worse than literal fascism.
Literally right here.
Or are you trying to desperately weasel word that you technically didn't say "DNC" you said "the party's leaders", like is that pathetic dumb BS what you're going for?
Or are you trying to desperately weasel word that you technically didn't say "DNC" you said "the party's leaders", like is that pathetic dumb BS what you're going for?
November 18, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Literally right here.
Or are you trying to desperately weasel word that you technically didn't say "DNC" you said "the party's leaders", like is that pathetic dumb BS what you're going for?
Or are you trying to desperately weasel word that you technically didn't say "DNC" you said "the party's leaders", like is that pathetic dumb BS what you're going for?
My trending is particularly wacky right now.
November 17, 2025 at 11:14 PM
My trending is particularly wacky right now.