Lawsome
lawsomepup.bsky.social
Lawsome
@lawsomepup.bsky.social
30s. Gay kink. @switchbastien’s collared dogboy. Episcopalian. Politics. DC comics? Warhammer? Not legal advice. Views my own.
Reposted by Lawsome
What you WANT to happen and what would LIKELY happen are not the same thing. This fan narrative gives the NHL & hockey culture a huge pass for a metric ton of awful shit & puts the onus for the lack of out gay players entirely on individual players “choosing” to not come out.
December 20, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Reposted by Lawsome
Closeted queer NHL players are not going to feel excited seeing “how feral we are about the Skip kiss” or by the knowledge that you being feral about two hot actors kissing on TV “would 100 000% transfer to them”! They don’t want to become sex objects/romance projections for random strangers!
December 19, 2025 at 5:36 PM
The real pessimist says there’s still a lot further to fall.
December 21, 2025 at 3:23 PM
“And we’ll fill the vacant ranks with a million freedmen more” is my winner from Battle Cry.

But yeah, battle hymn is great, but you can’t really extract the God from it.
December 20, 2025 at 2:19 AM
I remain, as ever, the lib Christian the atheists can mostly tolerate (cause I’m right 😁)
December 20, 2025 at 2:08 AM
The unified mainline is a really fascinating future for the church and I’m kinda really excited by the possibility.

Gimme a woke great awakening, please.
December 20, 2025 at 2:07 AM
God’s foremost servants are a bunch of atheist doctors working for MSF, tbh.
December 20, 2025 at 2:05 AM
A good consolation alternative to the stupid current standard, yes.
December 20, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Yes, but more in a sense of “the correct response to an insane hegemon is an appeal to a wrathful deity.”
December 20, 2025 at 1:44 AM
This ends with the Joint OAS-NATO Task Force on Gulf Security trying Americans at The Hague.
December 19, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Well yes, but the advocates made much of this point in the briefing. It’s not like SCOTUS doesn’t know, they are just engaged in bad faith nonsense distinctions.
December 18, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Or put differently, yeah, but it got little play because that’s the whole point of the (idiotic) logic of the opinion.
December 18, 2025 at 2:44 PM
The majority opinion relies on a diagnosis that is explicitly defined by sex of the child and then says because the discrimination is based on that diagnosis rather than sex, it’s not sex discrimination. So it seems to follow that other discrimination based on diagnosis is uninteresting
December 18, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Yes, but also the next time I hear Germans talking about my country being “young” I’m gonna tear my hair out.
December 18, 2025 at 3:54 AM
I guess I feel like Blanc’s alienation really should have been a bit more *personal* than it was.
December 18, 2025 at 3:19 AM
Not quite as brilliant as the original but very very good.

(I am a bit sad that they did NOTHING with the “Blanc is canonically queer” thing tho)
December 17, 2025 at 11:42 PM
The Lord of the Rings was published in the 50s 😁
December 17, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Sure, people have always been dumb.
December 17, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Etihad park??? Really???
December 17, 2025 at 6:39 PM