Like, do you think someone starts contributing less to American culture just because the administration revoked their TPS status without notice?

I was not surprised to hear there wouldn't be one in DC, but genuinely shocked there wasn't at least one in Baltimore (may have been a hotel room issue)

Notably the Washington DC-Baltimore-Arlington Combined Statistical Area (the third largest in the country!) didn't get a Taylor Swift conference, apparently due to poor facilities options

Stadium/Armory stop is still there (has always been a bit of a walk from the stadium, esp. compared to stops for Nats Park and Capitol One Arena, though)

I know.

They're building a replacement stadium

Zoo lights?

It seems to me that many of the people advocating for moderation treat policy preferences as exogenous but saliences as endogenous to political communication, while many advocating for the relative lower importance of moderation outside of the swingiest races do the reverse.

... is the salience of that issue (and perceived relevance to, say, elections) the result of exogenous forces, or are they endogenous to political communication (ads, speeches, etc)?

More specifically, for any given issue, are preferences over policy exogenous, such that people hold the preferences they have regardless of political communication, or are those preferences the result of the political communication environment (esp. cues from in-party elites)? And...

Episode here: www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/otm...