Jerry M. Withers
@jemwit.bsky.social
If you know me you know me. He/him/his #resistance
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
They missed on redacting Trump from all of the Epstein files.
Top of the last page shows some very incriminating stuff:
www.justice.gov/multimedia/C...
www.ibtimes.co.uk/report-claim...
Top of the last page shows some very incriminating stuff:
www.justice.gov/multimedia/C...
www.ibtimes.co.uk/report-claim...
December 20, 2025 at 6:12 PM
They missed on redacting Trump from all of the Epstein files.
Top of the last page shows some very incriminating stuff:
www.justice.gov/multimedia/C...
www.ibtimes.co.uk/report-claim...
Top of the last page shows some very incriminating stuff:
www.justice.gov/multimedia/C...
www.ibtimes.co.uk/report-claim...
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
WOW: The DOJ has DELETED an image from its release of the Epstein files that shows photos of Trump in a drawer.
Yesterday, we noted that this image — file 468 — likely slipped through the cracks while officials were attempting to hide materials pertaining to Trump.
Now, it’s gone.
Yesterday, we noted that this image — file 468 — likely slipped through the cracks while officials were attempting to hide materials pertaining to Trump.
Now, it’s gone.
December 20, 2025 at 6:01 PM
WOW: The DOJ has DELETED an image from its release of the Epstein files that shows photos of Trump in a drawer.
Yesterday, we noted that this image — file 468 — likely slipped through the cracks while officials were attempting to hide materials pertaining to Trump.
Now, it’s gone.
Yesterday, we noted that this image — file 468 — likely slipped through the cracks while officials were attempting to hide materials pertaining to Trump.
Now, it’s gone.
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Q: “Why do you think Trump is working so hard to stop the Epstein files from coming out?”
REPUBLICAN Rep. Massie: “These files implicate billionaires, friends of Trump, political donors — and Epstein had ties to 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 intelligence agencies.”
REPUBLICAN Rep. Massie: “These files implicate billionaires, friends of Trump, political donors — and Epstein had ties to 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 intelligence agencies.”
December 20, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Q: “Why do you think Trump is working so hard to stop the Epstein files from coming out?”
REPUBLICAN Rep. Massie: “These files implicate billionaires, friends of Trump, political donors — and Epstein had ties to 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 intelligence agencies.”
REPUBLICAN Rep. Massie: “These files implicate billionaires, friends of Trump, political donors — and Epstein had ties to 🇺🇸 & 🇮🇱 intelligence agencies.”
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
"Now the coverup is out in the open. This is far from over.
Everyone involved will have to answer for this. Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, whole admin.
Protecting a bunch of rapists and pedophiles because they have money, power, and connections.
Bondi should resign tonight."
AOC
Everyone involved will have to answer for this. Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, whole admin.
Protecting a bunch of rapists and pedophiles because they have money, power, and connections.
Bondi should resign tonight."
AOC
December 20, 2025 at 6:35 PM
"Now the coverup is out in the open. This is far from over.
Everyone involved will have to answer for this. Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, whole admin.
Protecting a bunch of rapists and pedophiles because they have money, power, and connections.
Bondi should resign tonight."
AOC
Everyone involved will have to answer for this. Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, whole admin.
Protecting a bunch of rapists and pedophiles because they have money, power, and connections.
Bondi should resign tonight."
AOC
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Washington Post's new headline is still wrong.
1. The release was not "huge."
2. DOJ missed the deadline to release all the files.
3, No mention of extensive redactions.
Support independent, pro-democracy media. hubs.ly/Q03CbHTt0
1. The release was not "huge."
2. DOJ missed the deadline to release all the files.
3, No mention of extensive redactions.
Support independent, pro-democracy media. hubs.ly/Q03CbHTt0
December 20, 2025 at 1:39 PM
Washington Post's new headline is still wrong.
1. The release was not "huge."
2. DOJ missed the deadline to release all the files.
3, No mention of extensive redactions.
Support independent, pro-democracy media. hubs.ly/Q03CbHTt0
1. The release was not "huge."
2. DOJ missed the deadline to release all the files.
3, No mention of extensive redactions.
Support independent, pro-democracy media. hubs.ly/Q03CbHTt0
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
NEW: After months of the government telling the court under penalty of perjury that the US Attorney alone made the decision to charge Kilmar Abrego with a crime, there is now EVIDENCE tying Todd Blanche to the decision. More to come on Substack... storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
#272 in United States v. Abrego Garcia (M.D. Tenn., 3:25-cr-00115) – CourtListener.com
NOTICE of Defendant's Supplemental Brief on United States' Motion to Quash (Redacted) by Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia (Hecker, Sean) (Entered: 12/19/2025)
storage.courtlistener.com
December 20, 2025 at 4:19 PM
NEW: After months of the government telling the court under penalty of perjury that the US Attorney alone made the decision to charge Kilmar Abrego with a crime, there is now EVIDENCE tying Todd Blanche to the decision. More to come on Substack... storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Much reporting re DOJ’s omissions and redactions…but whose decisions were they? Surely they went up the line to Blanche and Bondi? Did they overrule career staff? Did they consult with the White House? With Trump?
And if it’s a unitary executive, aren’t they all Trump’s decisions, redactions, etc?
And if it’s a unitary executive, aren’t they all Trump’s decisions, redactions, etc?
December 20, 2025 at 8:01 PM
Much reporting re DOJ’s omissions and redactions…but whose decisions were they? Surely they went up the line to Blanche and Bondi? Did they overrule career staff? Did they consult with the White House? With Trump?
And if it’s a unitary executive, aren’t they all Trump’s decisions, redactions, etc?
And if it’s a unitary executive, aren’t they all Trump’s decisions, redactions, etc?
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
This is potentially a massive cover-up. Where is the corporate-owned legacy media that claims it exists to expose government corruption? www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/...
DOJ Likely Pulled Photo of Trump from Released Epstein Files
Read more here.
www.democracydocket.com
December 20, 2025 at 7:20 PM
This is potentially a massive cover-up. Where is the corporate-owned legacy media that claims it exists to expose government corruption? www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/...
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
This is key; the biggest thing that didn't happen yesterday is neither Trump nor DOJ stated that everything with Trump's name on it or with his image has been disclosed.
If you have nothing to hide, wouldn't that be what you would do?
Instead, looks like DOJ is continuing the cover-up, as Ryan notes
If you have nothing to hide, wouldn't that be what you would do?
Instead, looks like DOJ is continuing the cover-up, as Ryan notes
A key to understand how the Bondi DOJ may be trying to hide information on other men implicated in Epstein's crimes:
Note how Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche's letter to Congress says DOJ is redacting information not only permitted by the Epstein Act but also ... the Privacy Act.⬇️
Note how Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche's letter to Congress says DOJ is redacting information not only permitted by the Epstein Act but also ... the Privacy Act.⬇️
December 20, 2025 at 2:05 PM
This is key; the biggest thing that didn't happen yesterday is neither Trump nor DOJ stated that everything with Trump's name on it or with his image has been disclosed.
If you have nothing to hide, wouldn't that be what you would do?
Instead, looks like DOJ is continuing the cover-up, as Ryan notes
If you have nothing to hide, wouldn't that be what you would do?
Instead, looks like DOJ is continuing the cover-up, as Ryan notes
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Pam Bondi has just released The [REDACTED] Commandments:
December 20, 2025 at 7:17 PM
Pam Bondi has just released The [REDACTED] Commandments:
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
On this episode of "People We Know Aren't In The Epstein Files"...
December 20, 2025 at 8:40 PM
On this episode of "People We Know Aren't In The Epstein Files"...
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
The Kennedys hosted Ella Fitzgerald, Pablo Casals, Aaron Copland, and Leonard Bernstein at the White House.
Donald Trump hosted Kid Rock.
Donald Trump hosted Kid Rock.
December 19, 2025 at 2:12 AM
The Kennedys hosted Ella Fitzgerald, Pablo Casals, Aaron Copland, and Leonard Bernstein at the White House.
Donald Trump hosted Kid Rock.
Donald Trump hosted Kid Rock.
Bondi, Noem, et al. Must answer for their open violations of the law and court orders. Otherwise, the rule of law is meaningless and we have no democracy, just an oligarchy.
December 19, 2025 at 7:03 PM
Bondi, Noem, et al. Must answer for their open violations of the law and court orders. Otherwise, the rule of law is meaningless and we have no democracy, just an oligarchy.
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Round up them all up!
December 14, 2025 at 1:43 AM
Round up them all up!
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
NEW: The DOJ appears poised to miss a deadline to publicly release all of its files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, violating a new federal law explicitly requiring the documents to be turned over for the public.
DOJ Chickens Out on Epstein Files Release in Violation of New Law
Read more here.
www.democracydocket.com
December 19, 2025 at 6:57 PM
NEW: The DOJ appears poised to miss a deadline to publicly release all of its files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, violating a new federal law explicitly requiring the documents to be turned over for the public.
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Courts *can* compel them, but I don’t know if any of them actually will. I expect if it goes that route, the administration will try to delay as much as possible - and who knows what SCOTUS will do.
Re: Epstein, they’re grasping at straws. Charge Clinton if there’s evidence. We don’t care.
Re: Epstein, they’re grasping at straws. Charge Clinton if there’s evidence. We don’t care.
December 14, 2025 at 1:39 AM
Courts *can* compel them, but I don’t know if any of them actually will. I expect if it goes that route, the administration will try to delay as much as possible - and who knows what SCOTUS will do.
Re: Epstein, they’re grasping at straws. Charge Clinton if there’s evidence. We don’t care.
Re: Epstein, they’re grasping at straws. Charge Clinton if there’s evidence. We don’t care.
Unconstitutional!
BREAKING: The Trump administration has escalated its probe of Sen. Mark Kelly into an official Command Investigation under military law, further targeting a sitting U.S. senator for constitutionally protected speech.
Trump Admin Intensifies Military Probe Against Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly, Launches Command Investigation
Read more here.
www.democracydocket.com
December 16, 2025 at 4:56 AM
Unconstitutional!
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
To those thinking Russia is winning in Ukraine:
Imagine if when we invaded Iraq, we were almost four years into it, only occupied 20 percent, and lost a million men.
Not a soul would call that “winning.”
Imagine if when we invaded Iraq, we were almost four years into it, only occupied 20 percent, and lost a million men.
Not a soul would call that “winning.”
December 16, 2025 at 1:16 AM
To those thinking Russia is winning in Ukraine:
Imagine if when we invaded Iraq, we were almost four years into it, only occupied 20 percent, and lost a million men.
Not a soul would call that “winning.”
Imagine if when we invaded Iraq, we were almost four years into it, only occupied 20 percent, and lost a million men.
Not a soul would call that “winning.”
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
An unapologetic ally through and through. Thank you, Rob Reiner. May you and Michele rest in power.
December 16, 2025 at 12:28 AM
An unapologetic ally through and through. Thank you, Rob Reiner. May you and Michele rest in power.
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Trump is intellectually less competent, tactically less savvy, and politically weaker than he was even a year ago. And he's blatantly, flagrantly ill.
The costs of standing by him are going up, and the costs of defying him are plummeting.
The costs of standing by him are going up, and the costs of defying him are plummeting.
Anyone have any idea why Trump’s disgusting comments about Reiner are attracting all this hand wringing from republicans? He has built his entire political movement off of saying disgusting things and being a vile piece of shit to people.
December 16, 2025 at 1:02 AM
Trump is intellectually less competent, tactically less savvy, and politically weaker than he was even a year ago. And he's blatantly, flagrantly ill.
The costs of standing by him are going up, and the costs of defying him are plummeting.
The costs of standing by him are going up, and the costs of defying him are plummeting.
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
Reposted by Jerry M. Withers
This is the busiest time of the year for food pantries, and the combination of federal funding cuts and rising prices is making it difficult for many pantries to meet rising needs.
Please consider supporting your local food pantry this holiday season.
Please consider supporting your local food pantry this holiday season.
Find Your Local Food Bank and Holiday Food Boxes | Feeding America
Find the Feeding America member food bank nearest you. Over 200 member food banks can connect you with free food, food pantries, soup kitchens, and holiday food boxes in your community.
www.feedingamerica.org
December 16, 2025 at 1:33 AM
This is the busiest time of the year for food pantries, and the combination of federal funding cuts and rising prices is making it difficult for many pantries to meet rising needs.
Please consider supporting your local food pantry this holiday season.
Please consider supporting your local food pantry this holiday season.