A rezistenței
@gregglade.bsky.social
Sports, Politics, Education, Civics, Humans, Nature, Human nature
Do what's right.
Warning, some of the stuff I post will be responses to accounts that won’t be all that interesting. 🤷🏻
Do what's right.
Warning, some of the stuff I post will be responses to accounts that won’t be all that interesting. 🤷🏻
If I recall the facts in the time frame, Netanyahu wanted to finally end Hamas after 18 years of Israel having to defend itself from daily terrorists next door. He wasn't going to go for "You can kill 1200 Israelis and then return the hostages and we'll call it even."
So, yeah, good on Netanyahu.
So, yeah, good on Netanyahu.
December 4, 2025 at 4:05 AM
If I recall the facts in the time frame, Netanyahu wanted to finally end Hamas after 18 years of Israel having to defend itself from daily terrorists next door. He wasn't going to go for "You can kill 1200 Israelis and then return the hostages and we'll call it even."
So, yeah, good on Netanyahu.
So, yeah, good on Netanyahu.
I said, about an earlier ballot, you can’t go Rollins and Utley without including Hamels.
Saw an article late last week illustrating that Hamels’ credentials are easily among those second tier pitchers already in the HOF.
Saw an article late last week illustrating that Hamels’ credentials are easily among those second tier pitchers already in the HOF.
December 4, 2025 at 2:58 AM
I said, about an earlier ballot, you can’t go Rollins and Utley without including Hamels.
Saw an article late last week illustrating that Hamels’ credentials are easily among those second tier pitchers already in the HOF.
Saw an article late last week illustrating that Hamels’ credentials are easily among those second tier pitchers already in the HOF.
Are there posts in this thread that name each of the attendees and the companies they lead?
That would be a good use of typing.
That would be a good use of typing.
December 4, 2025 at 2:48 AM
Are there posts in this thread that name each of the attendees and the companies they lead?
That would be a good use of typing.
That would be a good use of typing.
And yet more people died needlessly in Dresden in one night and in Dortmund in one night than did in 2 years of Hamas hiding behind them when half of them were holding g a gun.
Would you say Israel has the means to wipe out almost the entire population of Palestinians on the West Bank?
Would you say Israel has the means to wipe out almost the entire population of Palestinians on the West Bank?
December 4, 2025 at 2:39 AM
And yet more people died needlessly in Dresden in one night and in Dortmund in one night than did in 2 years of Hamas hiding behind them when half of them were holding g a gun.
Would you say Israel has the means to wipe out almost the entire population of Palestinians on the West Bank?
Would you say Israel has the means to wipe out almost the entire population of Palestinians on the West Bank?
So much, in fact, that the first change, as an amendment, could be unlikely to happen.
However, if a law becomes popular because of the good it does, like the ACA, it is very hard to rescind, as the Republicans have demonstrated for the past 8 years.
It’s OK. We’re disagreeing only on degree. 👍
However, if a law becomes popular because of the good it does, like the ACA, it is very hard to rescind, as the Republicans have demonstrated for the past 8 years.
It’s OK. We’re disagreeing only on degree. 👍
December 4, 2025 at 2:36 AM
So much, in fact, that the first change, as an amendment, could be unlikely to happen.
However, if a law becomes popular because of the good it does, like the ACA, it is very hard to rescind, as the Republicans have demonstrated for the past 8 years.
It’s OK. We’re disagreeing only on degree. 👍
However, if a law becomes popular because of the good it does, like the ACA, it is very hard to rescind, as the Republicans have demonstrated for the past 8 years.
It’s OK. We’re disagreeing only on degree. 👍
As you point out in your example, an amendment can be rescinded as well.
Another example would be the 18th.
Another example would be the 18th.
December 4, 2025 at 2:32 AM
As you point out in your example, an amendment can be rescinded as well.
Another example would be the 18th.
Another example would be the 18th.
Anything can be rescinded if a law is passed to rescind it for a specific situation, such as discovered rampant corruption that paid for the pardons.
December 4, 2025 at 2:29 AM
Anything can be rescinded if a law is passed to rescind it for a specific situation, such as discovered rampant corruption that paid for the pardons.
Thank you for the quick explanation. 👍
December 4, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Thank you for the quick explanation. 👍
The cost of the production and distribution of the Starbucks commercial I saw on TV tonight would have probably met the cost of all the salary needs over the next 2 years for all of those on strike.
December 4, 2025 at 2:19 AM
The cost of the production and distribution of the Starbucks commercial I saw on TV tonight would have probably met the cost of all the salary needs over the next 2 years for all of those on strike.
The thing is, Hitler did a lot of bad shit and put a lot of things in place. As soon as he was gone, all of his shit was rescinded.
The same should be true here: EOs, closings, firings, pardons - all rescinded, as if they didn’t happen.
The same should be true here: EOs, closings, firings, pardons - all rescinded, as if they didn’t happen.
December 4, 2025 at 2:11 AM
The thing is, Hitler did a lot of bad shit and put a lot of things in place. As soon as he was gone, all of his shit was rescinded.
The same should be true here: EOs, closings, firings, pardons - all rescinded, as if they didn’t happen.
The same should be true here: EOs, closings, firings, pardons - all rescinded, as if they didn’t happen.
“Bad breakup” would be underselling it.
Leavitt’s brother (the husband) was in a custody fight with his estranged (soon to be deported) wife and has been quoted as saying she could “rot in hell”.
Those are just the apparent facts in this one. The inference is for you to determine.
Leavitt’s brother (the husband) was in a custody fight with his estranged (soon to be deported) wife and has been quoted as saying she could “rot in hell”.
Those are just the apparent facts in this one. The inference is for you to determine.
December 4, 2025 at 2:08 AM
“Bad breakup” would be underselling it.
Leavitt’s brother (the husband) was in a custody fight with his estranged (soon to be deported) wife and has been quoted as saying she could “rot in hell”.
Those are just the apparent facts in this one. The inference is for you to determine.
Leavitt’s brother (the husband) was in a custody fight with his estranged (soon to be deported) wife and has been quoted as saying she could “rot in hell”.
Those are just the apparent facts in this one. The inference is for you to determine.
“Dozing Don” is better.
Not mine, but better.
Not mine, but better.
December 4, 2025 at 1:51 AM
“Dozing Don” is better.
Not mine, but better.
Not mine, but better.
If this isn’t 15 seconds of every third Democrat campaign ad in October, someone is practicing malfeasance.
December 4, 2025 at 1:49 AM
If this isn’t 15 seconds of every third Democrat campaign ad in October, someone is practicing malfeasance.
Will the resolution have automatic penalties triggered that can’t be countermanded when he violates it anyway?
December 4, 2025 at 12:47 AM
Will the resolution have automatic penalties triggered that can’t be countermanded when he violates it anyway?
I agree, and it would eliminate gerrymandering. But, if done across a state, which I think you’re suggesting, it would also diminish local representation.
December 4, 2025 at 12:42 AM
I agree, and it would eliminate gerrymandering. But, if done across a state, which I think you’re suggesting, it would also diminish local representation.
A search on that account suggests otherwise. But it can label the information anything it wants. It doesn’t bother me.
Apparently he has a hold on your opinion. That’s OK too.
Enjoy your night.
Apparently he has a hold on your opinion. That’s OK too.
Enjoy your night.
December 4, 2025 at 12:27 AM
A search on that account suggests otherwise. But it can label the information anything it wants. It doesn’t bother me.
Apparently he has a hold on your opinion. That’s OK too.
Enjoy your night.
Apparently he has a hold on your opinion. That’s OK too.
Enjoy your night.
At least you’re not asking any wild ass questions any longer.
December 4, 2025 at 12:25 AM
At least you’re not asking any wild ass questions any longer.
Oh, some account labeled it to suit himself. 🤣
December 4, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Oh, some account labeled it to suit himself. 🤣
Labeled where?
Maybe a screenshot would serve.
Maybe a screenshot would serve.
December 4, 2025 at 12:09 AM
Labeled where?
Maybe a screenshot would serve.
Maybe a screenshot would serve.
I may be stupid. 🤷🏻
What is PR supposed to mean there?
What is PR supposed to mean there?
December 4, 2025 at 12:08 AM
I may be stupid. 🤷🏻
What is PR supposed to mean there?
What is PR supposed to mean there?
When you read the article, your wild ass question will be answered.
December 4, 2025 at 12:07 AM
When you read the article, your wild ass question will be answered.
The guy who wrote the Substack article did the research.
Not sure why you couldn’t discern that, but it takes all kinds.
Not sure why you couldn’t discern that, but it takes all kinds.
December 4, 2025 at 12:06 AM
The guy who wrote the Substack article did the research.
Not sure why you couldn’t discern that, but it takes all kinds.
Not sure why you couldn’t discern that, but it takes all kinds.