Reposted by Emmowwenn
Anybody gonna drop Part 3 into a google doc for us? Because as much as I would normally abhor not paying for a journalist’s work, they’ve both ceased to be journalists and I won’t give them a dime. Ever.
But I’m weak and would read.
But I’m weak and would read.
November 26, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Anybody gonna drop Part 3 into a google doc for us? Because as much as I would normally abhor not paying for a journalist’s work, they’ve both ceased to be journalists and I won’t give them a dime. Ever.
But I’m weak and would read.
But I’m weak and would read.
Reposted by Emmowwenn
If this stuff is actually newsworthy and consequential and he has been sitting on it until the right moment that benefits himself most, he should probably never work in journalism ever again.
November 26, 2025 at 10:23 PM
If this stuff is actually newsworthy and consequential and he has been sitting on it until the right moment that benefits himself most, he should probably never work in journalism ever again.
Reposted by Emmowwenn
As a journalist who works really really hard to do meaningful work and holds herself to extremely high ethical standards, I’m livid that this is the obvious takeaway for non journalists
November 26, 2025 at 10:39 PM
As a journalist who works really really hard to do meaningful work and holds herself to extremely high ethical standards, I’m livid that this is the obvious takeaway for non journalists
Reposted by Emmowwenn
I can't imagine anyone watching him air out journalistic malpractice between airing his dirty laundry (piecemeal, behind a paywall) and thinking this is some kind of redemption. Also, considering how much he is doing, the details of his firing from TNY are definitely going to be aired out soon.
November 26, 2025 at 9:28 PM
I can't imagine anyone watching him air out journalistic malpractice between airing his dirty laundry (piecemeal, behind a paywall) and thinking this is some kind of redemption. Also, considering how much he is doing, the details of his firing from TNY are definitely going to be aired out soon.
Reposted by Emmowwenn
So the editor of New York Magazine said there was no bias or ethical problems with Olivia's articles?
Does he still think that?
They should retract all of her stories
Does he still think that?
They should retract all of her stories
November 26, 2025 at 10:35 PM
So the editor of New York Magazine said there was no bias or ethical problems with Olivia's articles?
Does he still think that?
They should retract all of her stories
Does he still think that?
They should retract all of her stories
Reposted by Emmowwenn
This is who Vanity Fair decided to hire? Embarrassing all around.
November 26, 2025 at 10:42 PM
This is who Vanity Fair decided to hire? Embarrassing all around.
Reposted by Emmowwenn
One might doubt people would ever believe you. 'My young girlfriend cheated on me--now let me tell you a story of what an unethical liar she is...' She is very popular with the press corps., obviously. Maybe he is not.
November 26, 2025 at 10:47 PM
One might doubt people would ever believe you. 'My young girlfriend cheated on me--now let me tell you a story of what an unethical liar she is...' She is very popular with the press corps., obviously. Maybe he is not.
Reposted by Emmowwenn
Oh, Lizza is also a terrible, horrible, rotten, no good, very bad human.
November 26, 2025 at 10:39 PM
Oh, Lizza is also a terrible, horrible, rotten, no good, very bad human.
Reposted by Emmowwenn
[email protected]
I asked why they haven't retracted her articles now that we know she clearly wasn't being objective during the campaign.
Maybe if we all email they'll have to actually respond
I asked why they haven't retracted her articles now that we know she clearly wasn't being objective during the campaign.
Maybe if we all email they'll have to actually respond
November 26, 2025 at 10:44 PM
[email protected]
I asked why they haven't retracted her articles now that we know she clearly wasn't being objective during the campaign.
Maybe if we all email they'll have to actually respond
I asked why they haven't retracted her articles now that we know she clearly wasn't being objective during the campaign.
Maybe if we all email they'll have to actually respond
Reposted by Emmowwenn
UPDATE: DOJ lawyers state that DHS Sec. Kristi Noem made decision not to return March 15 flights.
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights.
My write-thru at Law Dork:
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights.
My write-thru at Law Dork:
DOJ lawyers state that DHS Sec. Kristi Noem made decision not to return March 15 flights
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights. And, for paid subscribers: Closing my tabs.
www.lawdork.com
November 26, 2025 at 5:25 AM
UPDATE: DOJ lawyers state that DHS Sec. Kristi Noem made decision not to return March 15 flights.
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights.
My write-thru at Law Dork:
Also Tuesday, ACLU lawyers name Emil Bove, now a federal judge, as a possible witness in Boasberg's contempt inquiry over the flights.
My write-thru at Law Dork:
