For sure

Lmao do you not realize that the Democratic senators want this too?

The impetus was Jack smith but it’s 100% clear that Democratic senators think he is a worthy sacrifice if it provides them protection

How do you square your two statements here? It would seem that these legacy American Jewish institutions, are in fact, trying to monopolize the memory of the Holocaust. Struggling to understand the distinction (unless it was narrowly about anti-Semitic conspiracies about our history textbooks)

“Too complicated” like discussing claims of genocide would be “too complicated” for you? Or was the claim of blood libel a well reasoned position that you came to after having “complicated” discussions.

Well into ‘24 he was saying it was blood libel to accuse Israel of genocide. I think he’s just going to spend the rest of his life dodging accountability but I guess you can’t put anything past him.

Nearly the entire Israeli electorate is against any fair path to peace, and a majority of them support the governments genocide in Gaza and crimes in the WB. Claiming otherwise is misinforming readers.

Court records show the Trump Administration used lists passed directly from Canary Mission to target Mahmoud Khalil but this Roger Bennett guy blocked me for suggesting that some Jewish groups are responsible for a portion of the “can’t criticize Jews” position.

Embarrassing and harmful stuff

Is it still your position that believing Israel is committing genocide constitutes "blood libel"?