Christine Carroll
christine12.bsky.social
Christine Carroll
@christine12.bsky.social
Reposted by Christine Carroll
I share this with respect for the many excellent journalists at the BBC.

And with the hope that transparency helps strengthen, not weaken, our democratic culture. /5
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
Reposted by Christine Carroll
It’s especially ironic because the lecture is exactly about the ‘paralyzing cowardice’ of today’s elites.

About universities, corporations and media networks bending the knee to authoritarianism. /4
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
Reposted by Christine Carroll
This has happened against my wishes, and I’m genuinely dismayed by it.

Not because people can’t disagree with my words, but because self-censorship driven by fear (Trump threatening to sue the BBC) should concern all of us. /3
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
Reposted by Christine Carroll
This sentence was taken out of a lecture they commissioned, reviewed through the full editorial process, and recorded four weeks ago in front of 500 people in the BBC Radio Theatre.

I was told the decision came from the highest levels within the BBC. /2
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
Reposted by Christine Carroll
I am old enough to remember when repeatedly putting off revaluations for the rates became so politically toxic that they came up with the Poll Tax as an alternative.
November 25, 2025 at 10:32 AM
Reposted by Christine Carroll
QTing this not to dunk but because I think there's an important point here.

The bond markets did *not* get it wrong in the 2010s. As Martin Wolf put it then, they wanted us to borrow and spend. *Osborne* got it wrong.

So my baseline assumption is they are right now.

bsky.app/profile/adam...
I guess the problem is that the bond markets are not infallible and often get things wrong, so its not just a case of getting the economics right, but also communicating that to the bond markets in a way they can understand. Unfortunately, it *does* matter what they think
November 24, 2025 at 8:01 PM