It was *obvious* following his appearance on the Odd Lots podcast, but could be ascertained well before then.

I've really enjoyed The Umbrellas of Cherbourg the two or three times I've watched it, but I'm unsure how it would be classified as a comedy

In order to work, the gears of government must mesh, giving the departments a ‘partial agency in’ one another’s activities (F 47.325).”

Garry Wills in A Necessary Evil: “How did Madison respond to such accusations [of mixing the legislative, judicial, and executive powers]? He calmly admitted them. There is no perfect separation of the departments, and—given his functional defense of separation—there could not be. ...

“If I hate what the Securities and Exchange Commission is doing, or the Federal Trade Commission, or name your alphabet, what do I do about that? I can’t go to Congress. I can’t elect a different president.”

... Congress can and obviously does have power here & both changed markedly under Biden.

It was quite literally a major controversy surrounding the Clint Eastwood movie Richard Jewell!

I actually think very simple text only covers can be appealing (see this book "Two English Republican Tracts") but an all white background paired with a rather self-important title is a bit much, yeah.
books.google.com/books?id=v0t...

(Mainly because I'm not even sure that the summary is wholly accurate at first skim. The paper appears to be wholly focused on whether wealth effects for landlords are counterbalanced by gains for tenants, and not so much on investment or availability of rental units.)

You should probably link to the actual working paper, not the summary produced by the landlord advocacy org.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

There was one at a student volunteer led musical theater performance I attended just the other day. I believe that's the only time I've heard one outside of perhaps a DSA event I attended in the past or something?