Bearjew, Esq.
@bearjewesquire.bsky.social
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
this is the compromise position
"If we have to hunt you down, the way they hunted down Nazis for decades, we will find your identities. We will find you. We will achieve justice. And we will do so under the Constitution and laws of the United States."
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ft1...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ft1...
Philly DA vows to prosecute ‘wannabe Nazi' ICE agents who violate the law
YouTube video by NBC10 Philadelphia
www.youtube.com
January 29, 2026 at 2:56 PM
this is the compromise position
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
oh shit it's 2026??
January 5, 2026 at 4:40 PM
oh shit it's 2026??
happy epstein files day to those whoe celebrate
December 19, 2025 at 5:41 PM
happy epstein files day to those whoe celebrate
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
I don't know, Aaron. I think we need to take this seriously. In fact, after surveying hundreds of years of history in the past few days, I've written an article assessing the originalist case here:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
December 16, 2025 at 3:58 AM
I don't know, Aaron. I think we need to take this seriously. In fact, after surveying hundreds of years of history in the past few days, I've written an article assessing the originalist case here:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
lmao
BREAKING: Judge rules Lindsey Halligan's appointment was not valid, thus, she had no authority to present the James Comey or Letitia James indictments and the indictments are dismissed without prejudice.
November 24, 2025 at 5:51 PM
lmao
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
this is good news.... for Jeb!
October 30, 2025 at 11:29 PM
this is good news.... for Jeb!
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
COUNT I
Kat Abughazaleh did, while law enforcement was in heated pursuit, paint what appeared to be the entrance to a cave on a sheer rock wall, causing law enforcement to forcibly bonk into said wall.
COUNT II
The same thing on a different wall, but then a train came out and ran us over???
Kat Abughazaleh did, while law enforcement was in heated pursuit, paint what appeared to be the entrance to a cave on a sheer rock wall, causing law enforcement to forcibly bonk into said wall.
COUNT II
The same thing on a different wall, but then a train came out and ran us over???
October 29, 2025 at 5:44 PM
COUNT I
Kat Abughazaleh did, while law enforcement was in heated pursuit, paint what appeared to be the entrance to a cave on a sheer rock wall, causing law enforcement to forcibly bonk into said wall.
COUNT II
The same thing on a different wall, but then a train came out and ran us over???
Kat Abughazaleh did, while law enforcement was in heated pursuit, paint what appeared to be the entrance to a cave on a sheer rock wall, causing law enforcement to forcibly bonk into said wall.
COUNT II
The same thing on a different wall, but then a train came out and ran us over???
yeah I'm the president. the president of shit
October 19, 2025 at 2:29 PM
yeah I'm the president. the president of shit
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
> It is 2025 BC. I am a soldier from one of the outlying provinces called to defend the pyramid in Memphis
> It is 2025 AD. I am a soldier from one of the outlying provinces called to defend the pyramid in Memphis
> It is 2025 AD. I am a soldier from one of the outlying provinces called to defend the pyramid in Memphis
October 11, 2025 at 5:32 PM
> It is 2025 BC. I am a soldier from one of the outlying provinces called to defend the pyramid in Memphis
> It is 2025 AD. I am a soldier from one of the outlying provinces called to defend the pyramid in Memphis
> It is 2025 AD. I am a soldier from one of the outlying provinces called to defend the pyramid in Memphis
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
Spotted a Rule 11 sanctions poster in the wild today
October 8, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Spotted a Rule 11 sanctions poster in the wild today
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
hi, federal judge expert here! this is not funny. conservative, Reagan-appointed district judges only use epistolary framing devices in their opinions when they are in extreme distress.
the postcard cited in judge young's ruling isn't just at the top, it's a framing device. the whole opinion is a letter to the postcard writer. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
![I hope you found this
helpful. Thanks for writing.
It shows you care. You
should.
Sincerely & respectfully,
Bill Young
P.S. The next time you’re in
Boston [the postmark on the card
is from the Philadelphia area]
stop in at the Courthouse and
watch your fellow citizens, sitting
as jurors, reach out for justice.
It is here, and in courthouses
just like this one, both state and
federal, spread throughout our land
that our Constitution is most vibrantly
alive, for it is well said that “Where a
jury sits, there burns the lamp of
liberty.”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:maiw2rfujepnphhrejytvuu5/bafkreidbrekbkq3duu4ev7w4wmiamoiupplzgmu5nj5np4yyjze2svfyoy@jpeg)
September 30, 2025 at 5:52 PM
hi, federal judge expert here! this is not funny. conservative, Reagan-appointed district judges only use epistolary framing devices in their opinions when they are in extreme distress.
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
“The Roberts Court casually dismisses the lessons of American and world history, the warnings of prominent early Americans, and the judiciary’s storied legal minds.
Eddins ended his opinion saying, “State constitutionalism makes it easy to consider Roberts Court jurisprudence white noise.”
🫳
🎤
Eddins ended his opinion saying, “State constitutionalism makes it easy to consider Roberts Court jurisprudence white noise.”
🫳
🎤
NEW: Hawaii's Supreme Court keeps releasing opinions that denounce the U.S. Supreme Court.
The latest? A new ruling that requires the police to record all interrogations from now on.
The author took it as an opportunity to say Hawaii's court will protect due process—while SCOTUS isn't:
The latest? A new ruling that requires the police to record all interrogations from now on.
The author took it as an opportunity to say Hawaii's court will protect due process—while SCOTUS isn't:
Hawaii Supreme Court Expands Rights of Defendants, and Once Again Rebukes SCOTUS - Bolts
Hawaii justices ruled that their state constitution requires police to record interrogations. And they vowed to protect due process for Hawaiians—unlike, they said, the Roberts Court.
boltsmag.org
September 26, 2025 at 12:00 AM
“The Roberts Court casually dismisses the lessons of American and world history, the warnings of prominent early Americans, and the judiciary’s storied legal minds.
Eddins ended his opinion saying, “State constitutionalism makes it easy to consider Roberts Court jurisprudence white noise.”
🫳
🎤
Eddins ended his opinion saying, “State constitutionalism makes it easy to consider Roberts Court jurisprudence white noise.”
🫳
🎤
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
Cyril E. Power, "The Escalator," c. 1929 collections.mfa.org/objects/479542
September 24, 2025 at 10:54 PM
Cyril E. Power, "The Escalator," c. 1929 collections.mfa.org/objects/479542
anyone else getting raptured right now? just me? cya
September 23, 2025 at 1:13 PM
anyone else getting raptured right now? just me? cya
wait, when is the rapture?
September 22, 2025 at 5:31 PM
wait, when is the rapture?
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
oppose woke, have stroke
September 11, 2025 at 10:33 PM
oppose woke, have stroke
Donald Trump is going to announce that he has has seen the light of Islam
September 2, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Donald Trump is going to announce that he has has seen the light of Islam
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
The chef-owner of Good Pierogi on Alan Dershowitz: "Our handcrafted pierogi, made with love from locally sourced ingredients, are so undeniably delicious, he'll do anything to get his hands on them."
August 7, 2025 at 12:30 AM
The chef-owner of Good Pierogi on Alan Dershowitz: "Our handcrafted pierogi, made with love from locally sourced ingredients, are so undeniably delicious, he'll do anything to get his hands on them."
Reposted by Bearjew, Esq.
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
HE WAS NEVER A BIG FACTOR IN TERMS OF LIFE
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
HE WAS NEVER A BIG FACTOR IN TERMS OF LIFE
Q: Why do you think your supporters have been so interested in the Epstein story?
TRUMP: I don't understand it. He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of life. I don't understand what the fascination is. The credible information has been given. It's pretty boring stuff.
TRUMP: I don't understand it. He's dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of life. I don't understand what the fascination is. The credible information has been given. It's pretty boring stuff.
July 15, 2025 at 11:25 PM
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
HE WAS NEVER A BIG FACTOR IN TERMS OF LIFE
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
he was never a big factor in terms of life
HE WAS NEVER A BIG FACTOR IN TERMS OF LIFE
what's going on this fine Sunday morning with my "boys," and in some cases, "gals?"
July 13, 2025 at 3:10 PM
what's going on this fine Sunday morning with my "boys," and in some cases, "gals?"
@schnorkles.bsky.social just messaged me to say that the Mamdani win means blue tsunami in perpetuity
June 25, 2025 at 1:01 PM
@schnorkles.bsky.social just messaged me to say that the Mamdani win means blue tsunami in perpetuity
I'm not getting my hopes up but it would make things just a little brighter if Drew Ensign had to pay a civil contempt fine out of his own pocket
Abrego Garcia's attorneys go out of their way to argue that not only does Judge Xinis have the authority to impose fines against govt attorneys personally but that she could **forbid the govt from reimbursing them**.
![$5,000 fine for each defendant and $500 for each defense attorney for "intransigence" that
"hampered the discovery process and showed disdain for the court's orders." Id. at 1540, 1546.
Courts may impose monetary sanctions against government attorneys personally. For
example, in United States v. Sumitomo Marine & Fire Insurance Co., 617 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir.
1980), the Ninth Circuit upheld a $500 sanction "against the government's counsel personally" based on "callous disregard for the discovery processes and the orders of this Court." Id. at 1367
(quotation marks omitted).
The court may go even further and prohibit the government from reimbursing its attorneys
for their costs. In Chilcutt, 4 F.3d 1313, the court upheld a Rule 37 monetary sanction against an
Assistant United States Attorney for "disobey[ing] the district court's order to fulfill its discovery obligations and attempt[ing] to deceive the court and the plaintiffs into believing that certain
documents properly requested either did not exist or were not requested.... The court stated that
these sanctions were against the attorney, not against the United States, and forbade [the attorney] from seeking reimbursement from the Government." Id. at 1315, 1317. And in Cobell v. Norton,
213 F.R.D. 16, 31 (D.D.C. 2003), the court dealt with government attorneys who "repeatedly made groundless assertions of attorney-client privilege," sought to improperly narrow the scope of
deposition questioning, and "obstructed a legitimate inquiry into whether [the attorney's] co-counsel had lied to the Court." Id. at 31; see also id. (noting that the government's "discovery abuse" was "compounded" by the DOJ engaging in an "attempted coverup" by "fil[ing] a nineteen-page meritless memorandum that defended her conduct"). The court accordingly imposed Rule 37 monetary sanctions on the government attorneys personally, reasoning that "[the Court sees no reason why taxpayers should foot the burden of remedying the harm to plaintiffs…](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:qrllvid7s54k4hnwtqxwetrf/bafkreifyvvyvdvrwvje6ve2vchdpuwjizkdb3jft4mda4s6le2p2ydmmt4@jpeg)
![States from reimbursing the government attorneys, but noted that it was within the court's power
to do so. Id. (citing cases); cf. United States v. Shaffer Equip. Co., 158 F.R.D. 80, 88 (S.D. W. Va.
1994) (imposing monetary sanctions under Rule 26 against government attorneys and forbidding them from seeking reimbursement from the government).
Plaintiffs submit that fines should be imposed on the Defendants, and that personal
sanctions are warranted against, at minimum, Joseph Mazzara, based on the conduct detailed above.
E.
Civil Contempt
The Court may "treat[] as contempt of court the failure to obey" a court order. Fed. R. Civ.
P. 37(b)(2)(A)(vii); see also 18 U.S.C. § 401 ("A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority.").! The Fourth Circuit has affirmed civil contempt sanctions for parties that have evinced "disregard for the discovery process," such as by failing to produce discovery materials pursuant to a court order, that mirrors the conduct of the Government in the instant case. Life Techs. Corp. v. Govindaraj,
931 F.3d 259, 267-68 (4th Cir. 2019); see also RLI Ins. Co., 2022 WL 2654227, at *8 (holding a party in civil contempt for failing to adequately respond to interrogatories or produce requested
discovery materials).
19 Civil contempt, unlike criminal contempt, does not trigger "the procedural protections of notice and a hearing." Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., 269 F.R.D. 497, 499, 537, 540 41 (D.
Md. 2010) (holding a party in civil contempt, with the possibility of two years' imprisonment, based on misconduct during discovery process), aff'd in part, modified in part, 2010 WL 11747756
(D. Md. Nov. 1, 2010); see also Bralley v. Carey, 2011 WL 6326503, at *4-5 (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2011) (imposing schedule of increasing monetary sanctions for civil contemnor, with provision for incarceration if contemnor refused to comply with discovery requests for…](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:qrllvid7s54k4hnwtqxwetrf/bafkreihp4gohwgnw4blauhh3mesuvenxokvqnkws2dcspnmc3gbmnteuzq@jpeg)
June 12, 2025 at 5:02 PM
I'm not getting my hopes up but it would make things just a little brighter if Drew Ensign had to pay a civil contempt fine out of his own pocket