Bad FCC / Fairness Doctrine Takes
@badfcctakes.bsky.social
If you've see your words screenshotted here, it probably means you brought up a very, very bad take on the Fairness Doctrine or other FCC regulation you didn't understand.
Repost = good take. Screenshot = bad take
Repost = good take. Screenshot = bad take
Pinned
If you believe the Fairness Doctrine did any of the following, then you may see your posts appear on this page.
Well, even if it was, it can't apply to print, cable, internet, podcasts....the places from which people get much of their info.
December 7, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Well, even if it was, it can't apply to print, cable, internet, podcasts....the places from which people get much of their info.
Stop. Sharing. This.
It's objectively false on numerous points.
It's objectively false on numerous points.
December 7, 2025 at 10:42 PM
Stop. Sharing. This.
It's objectively false on numerous points.
It's objectively false on numerous points.
"Allowed", as if it would have prevented Fox News from existing had it remained.
December 7, 2025 at 10:41 PM
"Allowed", as if it would have prevented Fox News from existing had it remained.
Reposted by Bad FCC / Fairness Doctrine Takes
"We need to restore the Fairness Doctrine so that it can apply to media that we'll immediately ban."
Absolutely flawless.
Absolutely flawless.
December 4, 2025 at 5:48 PM
"We need to restore the Fairness Doctrine so that it can apply to media that we'll immediately ban."
Absolutely flawless.
Absolutely flawless.
This one's confused.
December 4, 2025 at 8:39 PM
This one's confused.
Speaking of bad Fairness Doctrine takes combined with unconstitutional suggestions......
December 4, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Speaking of bad Fairness Doctrine takes combined with unconstitutional suggestions......
The Fairness Doctrine never did this in the 1st place, and this suggestion is obviously unconstitutional.
December 4, 2025 at 5:39 PM
The Fairness Doctrine never did this in the 1st place, and this suggestion is obviously unconstitutional.
Siri, what is a "FCC News License"?
December 4, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Siri, what is a "FCC News License"?
The Fairness Doctrine had nothing to do with media consolidation
December 4, 2025 at 12:46 AM
The Fairness Doctrine had nothing to do with media consolidation
Oh the irony.
(Sure, Confusion-ist, you blocked me, but there are ways around that to mock your bullshit FCC posts)
(Sure, Confusion-ist, you blocked me, but there are ways around that to mock your bullshit FCC posts)
December 3, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Oh the irony.
(Sure, Confusion-ist, you blocked me, but there are ways around that to mock your bullshit FCC posts)
(Sure, Confusion-ist, you blocked me, but there are ways around that to mock your bullshit FCC posts)
An old narrative with a slightly new twist.
December 3, 2025 at 11:11 PM
An old narrative with a slightly new twist.
Bad FCC take shot with a bad 1st Amendment take chaser plus a dash of bad common sense take ("the government would define 'misinformation' in a way I agree with and only go after the bad guys like Fox News. No way would someone like Trump ever abuse this power if they were to get it).
December 3, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Bad FCC take shot with a bad 1st Amendment take chaser plus a dash of bad common sense take ("the government would define 'misinformation' in a way I agree with and only go after the bad guys like Fox News. No way would someone like Trump ever abuse this power if they were to get it).
By "it" he means the Fairness Doctrine 😂
December 3, 2025 at 11:04 PM
By "it" he means the Fairness Doctrine 😂
Oh great...another bad Fairness Doctrine meme.
The struggle continues.
The struggle continues.
December 3, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Oh great...another bad Fairness Doctrine meme.
The struggle continues.
The struggle continues.
Posted this person before and they still seem to think that facts were required by the Fairness Doctrine.
This is another reason an "updated FD for all media" would be useless: you can batter people over the head w/ facts and they will still cling to their incorrect preconceived narrative.
This is another reason an "updated FD for all media" would be useless: you can batter people over the head w/ facts and they will still cling to their incorrect preconceived narrative.
December 3, 2025 at 10:59 PM
Posted this person before and they still seem to think that facts were required by the Fairness Doctrine.
This is another reason an "updated FD for all media" would be useless: you can batter people over the head w/ facts and they will still cling to their incorrect preconceived narrative.
This is another reason an "updated FD for all media" would be useless: you can batter people over the head w/ facts and they will still cling to their incorrect preconceived narrative.
Some of this thread isn't bad, but this certainly is.
December 3, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Some of this thread isn't bad, but this certainly is.
"Without interfering with free speech laws" 🙄
December 3, 2025 at 1:55 AM
"Without interfering with free speech laws" 🙄
RT = good take, and this is a good take (I'd sub "some" for "most" but that's just nitpicking, innit?)
This is sounding like all of the Fairness Doctrine arguments…some folks do not understands how any of this works.
December 3, 2025 at 1:53 AM
RT = good take, and this is a good take (I'd sub "some" for "most" but that's just nitpicking, innit?)
I'm not sure this is a take, but I'm posting it anyway.
December 3, 2025 at 1:52 AM
I'm not sure this is a take, but I'm posting it anyway.
Found another who believes memes.
December 3, 2025 at 1:49 AM
Found another who believes memes.
Buffoon (n):
December 3, 2025 at 1:48 AM
Buffoon (n):