Bad FCC / Fairness Doctrine Takes
@badfcctakes.bsky.social
If you've see your words screenshotted here, it probably means you brought up a very, very bad take on the Fairness Doctrine or other FCC regulation you didn't understand.
Repost = good take. Screenshot = bad take
Repost = good take. Screenshot = bad take
Pinned
If you believe the Fairness Doctrine did any of the following, then you may see your posts appear on this page.
The Fairness Doctrine, had it remained, would not have impacted FoxNews even a little.
December 10, 2025 at 1:34 AM
The Fairness Doctrine, had it remained, would not have impacted FoxNews even a little.
Well, if Red believes it has no merit......
December 9, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Well, if Red believes it has no merit......
"Paved the way".
yeah no.
yeah no.
December 9, 2025 at 4:46 PM
"Paved the way".
yeah no.
yeah no.
Someone believes memes.
December 9, 2025 at 4:45 PM
Someone believes memes.
1) Because of the 1st Amendment.
2) A new Fairness Doctrine wouldn't impact Fox News. (See above)
3) This appears to be yet another person who thinks "Fairness" would mean "shutting down the cable channel I don't like."
2) A new Fairness Doctrine wouldn't impact Fox News. (See above)
3) This appears to be yet another person who thinks "Fairness" would mean "shutting down the cable channel I don't like."
December 8, 2025 at 9:47 PM
1) Because of the 1st Amendment.
2) A new Fairness Doctrine wouldn't impact Fox News. (See above)
3) This appears to be yet another person who thinks "Fairness" would mean "shutting down the cable channel I don't like."
2) A new Fairness Doctrine wouldn't impact Fox News. (See above)
3) This appears to be yet another person who thinks "Fairness" would mean "shutting down the cable channel I don't like."
I think there needs to be a special Fairness Doctrine just for Kevin! 😂
This is a perfect example of why we must regulate Big Kevin
"You're a big account, so you have a duty to ..."
Look, at some level, I get that.
But also ... I didn't run for the office of Big Account with a promise to you, the Bluesky voter, to deliver on certain issues.
I just logged onto the same site you did, made some posts, and people followed me.
Look, at some level, I get that.
But also ... I didn't run for the office of Big Account with a promise to you, the Bluesky voter, to deliver on certain issues.
I just logged onto the same site you did, made some posts, and people followed me.
December 8, 2025 at 9:45 PM
I think there needs to be a special Fairness Doctrine just for Kevin! 😂
The Fairness Doctrine would not have required this or any other story to appear on every or any channel.
December 8, 2025 at 6:18 PM
The Fairness Doctrine would not have required this or any other story to appear on every or any channel.
Terace is "many people"
December 8, 2025 at 6:17 PM
Terace is "many people"
Well, even if it was, it can't apply to print, cable, internet, podcasts....the places from which people get much of their info.
December 7, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Well, even if it was, it can't apply to print, cable, internet, podcasts....the places from which people get much of their info.
Stop. Sharing. This.
It's objectively false on numerous points.
It's objectively false on numerous points.
December 7, 2025 at 10:42 PM
Stop. Sharing. This.
It's objectively false on numerous points.
It's objectively false on numerous points.
"Allowed", as if it would have prevented Fox News from existing had it remained.
December 7, 2025 at 10:41 PM
"Allowed", as if it would have prevented Fox News from existing had it remained.
Reposted by Bad FCC / Fairness Doctrine Takes
"We need to restore the Fairness Doctrine so that it can apply to media that we'll immediately ban."
Absolutely flawless.
Absolutely flawless.
December 4, 2025 at 5:48 PM
"We need to restore the Fairness Doctrine so that it can apply to media that we'll immediately ban."
Absolutely flawless.
Absolutely flawless.
This one's confused.
December 4, 2025 at 8:39 PM
This one's confused.
Speaking of bad Fairness Doctrine takes combined with unconstitutional suggestions......
December 4, 2025 at 5:40 PM
Speaking of bad Fairness Doctrine takes combined with unconstitutional suggestions......
The Fairness Doctrine never did this in the 1st place, and this suggestion is obviously unconstitutional.
December 4, 2025 at 5:39 PM
The Fairness Doctrine never did this in the 1st place, and this suggestion is obviously unconstitutional.
Siri, what is a "FCC News License"?
December 4, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Siri, what is a "FCC News License"?
The Fairness Doctrine had nothing to do with media consolidation
December 4, 2025 at 12:46 AM
The Fairness Doctrine had nothing to do with media consolidation
Oh the irony.
(Sure, Confusion-ist, you blocked me, but there are ways around that to mock your bullshit FCC posts)
(Sure, Confusion-ist, you blocked me, but there are ways around that to mock your bullshit FCC posts)
December 3, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Oh the irony.
(Sure, Confusion-ist, you blocked me, but there are ways around that to mock your bullshit FCC posts)
(Sure, Confusion-ist, you blocked me, but there are ways around that to mock your bullshit FCC posts)
An old narrative with a slightly new twist.
December 3, 2025 at 11:11 PM
An old narrative with a slightly new twist.
