ANCIENT EVIL
@ancientevil.bsky.social
BOOKWORM, MegaTokyo fan/supporter. JOAT via lifelong learning. I love cats but can't eat a whole one.
Reposted by ANCIENT EVIL
If Trump’s DOJ wants that evidence again, it needs to have a “lawful search warrant.”
Full opinion storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Full opinion storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
December 13, 2025 at 1:41 AM
If Trump’s DOJ wants that evidence again, it needs to have a “lawful search warrant.”
Full opinion storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Full opinion storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Reposted by ANCIENT EVIL
Oh look one outlet (Fox News) got the heads up from @MarshaBlackburn imagine that
December 12, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Oh look one outlet (Fox News) got the heads up from @MarshaBlackburn imagine that
Reposted by ANCIENT EVIL
remember when their review summary couldn't tell the difference between sex and sexist? lol
bsky.app/profile/most...
bsky.app/profile/most...
I'm not doing as well over here. learned today from AI that I am a sexist, brb buying a fedora lol
December 12, 2025 at 5:58 PM
remember when their review summary couldn't tell the difference between sex and sexist? lol
bsky.app/profile/most...
bsky.app/profile/most...
Reposted by ANCIENT EVIL
This reminds me of the filing where I kept calling something the “Plaintiffs’ ostensible expert report” and they threw a fit at the “implication they had not produced a valid expert report.”
It got thrown out at trial for not being a valid expert report.
It got thrown out at trial for not being a valid expert report.
December 12, 2025 at 2:08 PM
This reminds me of the filing where I kept calling something the “Plaintiffs’ ostensible expert report” and they threw a fit at the “implication they had not produced a valid expert report.”
It got thrown out at trial for not being a valid expert report.
It got thrown out at trial for not being a valid expert report.
Reposted by ANCIENT EVIL
We have a “government” that “respects” the “law”
December 12, 2025 at 2:06 PM
We have a “government” that “respects” the “law”
Reposted by ANCIENT EVIL
Every time they appear just dispense with the quotation marks and read it as “so-called order” and it becomes a lot more scathing
December 12, 2025 at 2:05 PM
Every time they appear just dispense with the quotation marks and read it as “so-called order” and it becomes a lot more scathing
Reposted by ANCIENT EVIL
She was not fired because of her views! She was fired because she called a customer the N-word!
That is a thing she did! At their location! On the job!
That is a thing she did! At their location! On the job!
December 12, 2025 at 5:53 PM
She was not fired because of her views! She was fired because she called a customer the N-word!
That is a thing she did! At their location! On the job!
That is a thing she did! At their location! On the job!