Simon Youel
youellog.bsky.social
Simon Youel
@youellog.bsky.social
190 followers 240 following 18 posts
Head of Policy & Advocacy at Positive Money UK. Visiting Research Fellow, University of Manchester Law & Technology Initiative. Own views etc
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
False hope about what? That things could possibly get better? Labour telling on themselves here
Reposted by Simon Youel
NEW: UK taxpayers are losing £22 billion every year from losses at the Bank of England - the same as the entire Home Office annual budget. This is the result of a flawed implementation of the BoE's quantitative easing programme. We propose two steps to fix this leak. (1/4)
Reposted by Simon Youel
“High interest rates are a form of economic rent and should be kept as low as possible."

Our @youellog.bsky.social pushes back on the misguided suggestion that the Bank of England should be setting interest rates well above inflation in @thetimes.com via ‪@georgenixon97.bsky.social
bit.ly/3IITWen
Poor savings rates and inflation wipe 11p off every £1
There are calls for the Bank of England to act to protect our cash from the damaging effects of high inflation
www.thetimes.com
I thought this was about life insurance
Reposted by Simon Youel
In 2020, Brazil launched Pix, a public digital payment system during Covid. It is now dominant, undercutting credit & debit card providers, reducing transaction costs, enhancing productivity & increasing financial competition.
Don't tell me the state can't innovate.
www.economist.com/the-americas...
Excited to have joined the University of Manchester's Law and Technology Initiative as a Visiting Research Fellow

Looking forward to building the future of public money with @johnhaskell.bsky.social and the talented fellows I am lucky to be working with
www.law-tech.manchester.ac.uk/research/vis...
Visiting Research Fellows | Manchester Law and Technology Initiative | The University of Manchester
www.law-tech.manchester.ac.uk
Sad I am only just finding out about your exquisite music taste now
Either way banks could more reasonably use cash isa funding to increase loans to business, if increasing investment and growth is the goal here. The government seems to be signalling they don't trust banks to intermediate an optimal allocation of capital
Yes basel would make increasing allocation towards equities more expensive for banks for good reason. The government seems to want to pass risks onto consumers
what is stopping banks using cash isa funding to increase their allocation towards stocks if it's such a good idea for ordinary savers?
The government instead wants savers to prop-up a record high stock market. Presumably banks could use cash Isa funding to buy more stocks - is it that they don't want to take those risks themselves, and would prefer savers hold the bag?
Struggle to follow this reasoning from the government - do they think cash Isas literally function like cash under the bed?

What is stopping banks using Isa funding to invest? Is the government saying they don't trust banks to optimally allocate capital?

www.theguardian.com/money/2025/f...
Reposted by Simon Youel
Maybe this new 'Office for Value for Money' could look into this arrangement?

Or will the government continue to focus on trying to squeeze piecemeal sums out of victimising people on benefits, while quietly handing much larger amounts to bankers?

www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/dwp-pla...
DWP Plans for Bank Account Surveillance Likely to Breach Privacy Law
www.disabilityrightsuk.org
Assuming they stick to their fiscal rules (for better or worse), if the government just did something about this they could quite easily rebuild public services without needing to raise people's taxes. Perhaps they could even win the next election?
These transfers to the Bank of England appear to outweigh the savings the government hopes to make from cuts to departmental spending, and could perhaps even cover Labour's previous public investment target of £28bn a year
Maybe it's just me, but I'm not sure I will ever get over how the government talks so much about the need to reduce 'wasteful' public spending while effectively funneling tens of billions of pounds a year to the banking sector

www.bankofengland.co.uk/asset-purcha...
Didn't manage to get a screenshot, but the 'correct' answer to the question of what the BoE does was something about setting interest rates to manage savings which is...interesting
At first I wondered what the Bank of England is trying to achieve here...but then I realised that this is their strategy for dealing with inflation - guilting people into cutting back on spending

Like the squanderbug for today's boring dystopia

www.ladbible.com/news/bank-of...
Take the BoE quiz now for a chance of winning £1,000
To be in with the chance of winning up to £1,000, take the Bank of England quiz to test your money IQ here.
www.ladbible.com
Reposted by Simon Youel
⚡ NEW BLOG ⚡

tldr: financial markets caused temporary turmoil for the government this month, in a move that has likely now triggered public spending cuts, just to make "a quick buck"

(but you really should read it 👇)
positivemoney.org/update/how-d...
How deregulation may have worsened Rachel Reeves’ bond market headache
If Labour wants to win the next election, they may have to depart from the failed orthodoxy that favours free-reigning financial markets coupled with cuts
positivemoney.org
Allowing hedgefunds to dictate fiscal policy by shorting sovereign debt doesn't strike me as a good idea, but I suppose it's a necessary sacrifice we must make to increase the Competitiveness and Growth of the financial sector, the Crown Jewel Of Our Economy
It was easier to get away with when you had growth and no 2% inflation target
Reposted by Simon Youel
Good example of what is often wrong with journalism about economic issues.

The report takes as given the statement “spending cuts is the most economically viable option”.

It is far from established fact that, under current circumstances, further cuts are more “economically viable” than tax rises.
Reposted by Simon Youel
Indeed. This is only 'bad news' because the central bank is compelled to aim for an arbitrary number that will become ever less feasible as climate effects and geopolitical tensions intensify.
I know this just isn’t how the politics work (and wrote a thing about that recently), but…
… 5% wage growth and 3% inflation just sounds ideal to me.

After the stagnation of the 2010s, we should be loving this!