Wombatkidd
@wombatkidd.bsky.social
Disabled, queer, anarcho-communist wombat bard
I'm also a Christian anarchist and a Christian atheist so don't do Reddit atheism around me please.
"Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
I'm also a Christian anarchist and a Christian atheist so don't do Reddit atheism around me please.
"Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
Pinned
Wombatkidd
@wombatkidd.bsky.social
· Aug 5
I'm not even American but if I say a Democrat sucks some blue Maga moron pretty much always shows up to tell me I'm enabling Trump
Reposted by Wombatkidd
you're literally in a thread with several explicit examples, but sure, here's another:
I haven't seen anyone lay it out like this yet, so here's an in detail example where Jesse Singal violated ToS and BlueSky's Public response where they said "actually that doesn't count and also we're updating ToS anyway"
November 15, 2025 at 3:49 PM
you're literally in a thread with several explicit examples, but sure, here's another:
Reposted by Wombatkidd
Megyn Kelly was defending the rape of teenage girls in relation to Epstein. Fucking come on. That's a huge button for victims. You're protecting the wrong people.
November 15, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Megyn Kelly was defending the rape of teenage girls in relation to Epstein. Fucking come on. That's a huge button for victims. You're protecting the wrong people.
Reposted by Wombatkidd
bro you allow people to talk about why the genocide in palestine has to continue - is that support for a cause. can we talk about this stuff if it's support for a cause? is that what you're saying? that we just need to use passive voice?
November 15, 2025 at 3:43 PM
bro you allow people to talk about why the genocide in palestine has to continue - is that support for a cause. can we talk about this stuff if it's support for a cause? is that what you're saying? that we just need to use passive voice?
Reposted by Wombatkidd
wonder why the guy who got busted looking for barely legal teen porn has such a hard line on this stuff where saying a pedophile should get woodchippered is 'violent rhetoric' that must be stopped
Our answer is no.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
November 15, 2025 at 3:40 PM
wonder why the guy who got busted looking for barely legal teen porn has such a hard line on this stuff where saying a pedophile should get woodchippered is 'violent rhetoric' that must be stopped
Reposted by Wombatkidd
I am begging you people to sell this website to someone who actually gives a fuck
Our answer is no.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
November 15, 2025 at 3:38 PM
I am begging you people to sell this website to someone who actually gives a fuck
Reposted by Wombatkidd
If you decide that context doesn't matter when evaluating communication you're a terrible moderator and you should quit your job
Our answer is no.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
November 15, 2025 at 3:38 PM
If you decide that context doesn't matter when evaluating communication you're a terrible moderator and you should quit your job
Reposted by Wombatkidd
Aaron passionately believes in protecting pedophiles from posts.
Our answer is no.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
November 15, 2025 at 3:37 PM
Aaron passionately believes in protecting pedophiles from posts.
Reposted by Wombatkidd
Hey hi quick question: does this constitute violent rhetoric or nah
November 15, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Hey hi quick question: does this constitute violent rhetoric or nah
Reposted by Wombatkidd
Idk what openAI is so worried about lol we all know your deepest darkest secrets are perfectly safe with the New York Times
November 15, 2025 at 3:28 PM
Idk what openAI is so worried about lol we all know your deepest darkest secrets are perfectly safe with the New York Times
Reposted by Wombatkidd
Anyway girls 💅🏻 like I was saying lol
November 15, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Anyway girls 💅🏻 like I was saying lol
Reposted by Wombatkidd
I don't want pedophiles on this site or anywhere
Our answer is no.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
November 15, 2025 at 3:30 PM
I don't want pedophiles on this site or anywhere
Reposted by Wombatkidd
regardless of the original posts contents, why don't we deal with the fact that it took you *a month* to deal with *a death threat* you deemed serious enough to be punishable
Our answer is no.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
Conflating the topic of the discussion as support for the cause is a separate issue.
We’ve drawn this line since users have spoken repeatedly that they don’t want violent rhetoric here.
It’s just a near impossible task to do at scale consistently across languages/context.
November 15, 2025 at 3:30 PM
regardless of the original posts contents, why don't we deal with the fact that it took you *a month* to deal with *a death threat* you deemed serious enough to be punishable
Reposted by Wombatkidd
Please tell me we're not rehabilitating Space Laser Lady just because she and Trump had a quarrel.
She's still a racist, transphobic, antisemitic piece of shit.
She's still a racist, transphobic, antisemitic piece of shit.
November 15, 2025 at 3:28 PM
Please tell me we're not rehabilitating Space Laser Lady just because she and Trump had a quarrel.
She's still a racist, transphobic, antisemitic piece of shit.
She's still a racist, transphobic, antisemitic piece of shit.
Reposted by Wombatkidd
“um akshually that’s a toddler suffering from police brutality. totally different thing.”
November 10, 2025 at 6:21 PM
“um akshually that’s a toddler suffering from police brutality. totally different thing.”
Reposted by Wombatkidd
Considering they sided repeatedly with Jesse Singal over the people he has harmed (and be sure to look up what he’s said about teenagers and adults having sex!), you might want to delete this very ignorant response.
November 15, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Considering they sided repeatedly with Jesse Singal over the people he has harmed (and be sure to look up what he’s said about teenagers and adults having sex!), you might want to delete this very ignorant response.
Reposted by Wombatkidd
I think the problem is selective enforcement. It follows a pattern of people getting hit with bans and suspensions for obvious hyperbole while genuine hate rhetoric from transphobes, white supremacists, and pedophilia apologists are untouched.
November 15, 2025 at 3:42 PM
I think the problem is selective enforcement. It follows a pattern of people getting hit with bans and suspensions for obvious hyperbole while genuine hate rhetoric from transphobes, white supremacists, and pedophilia apologists are untouched.
Reposted by Wombatkidd
the fact that they keep empowering and siding with pedophiles suggests that they keep empowering and siding with pedophiles
November 15, 2025 at 3:40 PM
the fact that they keep empowering and siding with pedophiles suggests that they keep empowering and siding with pedophiles
Reposted by Wombatkidd
hey quick question: then why is Jesse Singal, who traffics almost exclusively in violent rhetoric against trans people, still here despite the userbases’ near unanimous desire to have him removed?
November 15, 2025 at 3:28 PM
hey quick question: then why is Jesse Singal, who traffics almost exclusively in violent rhetoric against trans people, still here despite the userbases’ near unanimous desire to have him removed?
Reposted by Wombatkidd
okay so why is this post still up & account still existing? actual question. the account isn’t even verified like some of the other fed gov accounts either, but also it shouldn’t matter when they post “we will kill you” along with videos of them killing people.
November 15, 2025 at 10:57 AM
okay so why is this post still up & account still existing? actual question. the account isn’t even verified like some of the other fed gov accounts either, but also it shouldn’t matter when they post “we will kill you” along with videos of them killing people.
Reposted by Wombatkidd
You were asked specifically about 15 year olds in general, switching it to "oh well yeah I think about my son all the time duh" is:
1: A bullshit copout excuse
2: Still fucking weird, as was pointed out to you
1: A bullshit copout excuse
2: Still fucking weird, as was pointed out to you
November 15, 2025 at 2:11 PM
You were asked specifically about 15 year olds in general, switching it to "oh well yeah I think about my son all the time duh" is:
1: A bullshit copout excuse
2: Still fucking weird, as was pointed out to you
1: A bullshit copout excuse
2: Still fucking weird, as was pointed out to you
Reposted by Wombatkidd
"If you show me things I said openly that's blackmail because I'm a dumb piece of shit" -gatwor
November 15, 2025 at 1:58 PM
"If you show me things I said openly that's blackmail because I'm a dumb piece of shit" -gatwor
Reposted by Wombatkidd
I think people who are cissplaining about people who won't vote for this person" mistake moral bedrock beliefs with "strategy."
I'm not doing strategy. You can listen or not. It's not like the Ds have been listening at any time in the past.
I will NEVER vote for a transphobic candidate. Period.
I'm not doing strategy. You can listen or not. It's not like the Ds have been listening at any time in the past.
I will NEVER vote for a transphobic candidate. Period.
So...I think the left sometimes feels like saying, "I won't vote for this person in the general election" is a way to push other Ds not to support that candidate. "if you nominate this person we'll walk and you'll lose!"
I think that strategy really backfires though. 1
I think that strategy really backfires though. 1
September 2, 2025 at 5:04 PM
I think people who are cissplaining about people who won't vote for this person" mistake moral bedrock beliefs with "strategy."
I'm not doing strategy. You can listen or not. It's not like the Ds have been listening at any time in the past.
I will NEVER vote for a transphobic candidate. Period.
I'm not doing strategy. You can listen or not. It's not like the Ds have been listening at any time in the past.
I will NEVER vote for a transphobic candidate. Period.
Reposted by Wombatkidd
I'm not doing strategy. My strategy is "I will not light myself on fire to keep you warm."
I think people who are cissplaining about people who won't vote for this person" mistake moral bedrock beliefs with "strategy."
I'm not doing strategy. You can listen or not. It's not like the Ds have been listening at any time in the past.
I will NEVER vote for a transphobic candidate. Period.
I'm not doing strategy. You can listen or not. It's not like the Ds have been listening at any time in the past.
I will NEVER vote for a transphobic candidate. Period.
So...I think the left sometimes feels like saying, "I won't vote for this person in the general election" is a way to push other Ds not to support that candidate. "if you nominate this person we'll walk and you'll lose!"
I think that strategy really backfires though. 1
I think that strategy really backfires though. 1
October 30, 2025 at 5:23 PM
I'm not doing strategy. My strategy is "I will not light myself on fire to keep you warm."
Reposted by Wombatkidd
you know, all you had to do was agree with this and you wouldn't keep getting called a pedophile by people who have been pro gaza forever lmfao bsky.app/profile/c0mm...
*everyone* should harass pedophiles online, it's what society does when it is at its best
November 15, 2025 at 1:12 PM
you know, all you had to do was agree with this and you wouldn't keep getting called a pedophile by people who have been pro gaza forever lmfao bsky.app/profile/c0mm...
Reposted by Wombatkidd
Scrolled a WHILE only to see this:
November 15, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Scrolled a WHILE only to see this: