Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
banner
vonneudeck.com
Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
@vonneudeck.com
2.4K followers 1.2K following 20K posts
Consultant for #ResilienceEngineering #SRE #CulturalAnthropology. Tech, populism, antisemitism, mobility, housing How systems fail and how anything ever worked at all πŸ“Berlin/Zuid-Limburg/Penn-ar-Bed/Aude Signal: nicolai.01
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
In the common fight against fascism it isn’t important that you like your ally β€” you might even rightfully hate them! β€” the important part is that you fight the fash together
Ich kann aus wissensethnologischer Perspektive ziemlich klar nachvollziehen, wie der Arzt zu dieser Aussage kommt. Also nicht, dass sie angebracht ist, sondern warum es sich gut in andere Erfahrungen und Dynamiken, die er besonders mit Patientinnen haben wird, fΓΌgt.
Reposted by Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
Reposted by Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
Die Menschen, von denen #Merz spricht, posten hier kaum, werden nicht gebeten, Artikeln zu schreiben, werden nicht interviewt – es ist an uns, ihre Geschichten zu finden & ihre Stimmen lauter zu machen. Sie mΓΌssen keine Γ„rzt*innen oder ReinigungskrΓ€fte sein, um unsere SolidaritΓ€t zu verdienen

1/7
Reposted by Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
#pastpuzzle 387
🟩🟨πŸŸ₯πŸŸ₯ (-182)
🟩πŸŸ₯🟨πŸŸ₯ (-67)
🟩🟩πŸŸ₯🟩 (-10)
🟩🟩🟩🟩 (0)

4/4 🟩
www.pastpuzzle.de
past puzzle
Errate das gesuchte Jahr mit Hilfe von 4 historischen Ereignissen. Ein von Wordle und Geschichte inspiriertes Spiel.
www.pastpuzzle.de
Wird die Fahrbahn etwas schmaler, das schadet gar nicht, da fahren die Leute langsamer
Very smart marking of seats for the frail, disabled and pregnant
#pastpuzzle 386
🟩🟩πŸŸ₯πŸŸ₯ (-3)
🟩🟩πŸŸ₯πŸŸ₯ (-25)
🟩🟩πŸŸ₯πŸŸ₯ (-16)
🟩🟩🟩🟩 (0)

4/4 🟩
www.pastpuzzle.de
past puzzle
Errate das gesuchte Jahr mit Hilfe von 4 historischen Ereignissen. Ein von Wordle und Geschichte inspiriertes Spiel.
www.pastpuzzle.de
That would be an amazing slogan right as the headline of the pricing page of a transparently priced SaaS
Reposted by Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
I polled 100+ attendees of my talk about which modes of transportation they use most and which they would *like* to use most. The results are pretty striking: most people travel most often by car, but their preferences are nearly the opposite. 87 use cars most, but only 20 *want* to! #CIRPA2025
I thought about doing something like that in 2017 because I was so annoyed with the existing β€žis this up?β€œ offers.
I think @5pi.de offered something like it aaS for a while?
β€žIf you have to ask, you can’t afford itβ€œ is not just true for clothes
And that is why so many love the word apartheid so much. Because they really do want for Israel to not be a legitimate country within any borders. No matter how those borders came into existence and who waged the gambles that lead to each of their current drawings.
Reposted by Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
#Berlin Kommt feiern!
Die Initiative Schwarze Menschen in Deutschland (ISD) wird 40 Jahre alt 🎊

🫢🏾 Kinderbetreuung
☝🏾 Rollstuhlgerecht
πŸ€™πŸΎ DGS-Verdolmetschung

Am Freitag, den 24.10.25 ab 12:30 Uhr
Powered by @isdbund.bsky.social
UnterstΓΌtzt von @hkw-berlin.bsky.social & #Heimaten
Reposted by Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
Thank you for formulating that so clearly. It goes also backwards in time. If you call it apartheid, you think of it as one state instead of two states of which one struggles to be founded/fully materialise.
Calling it apartheid implies the illegitimacy of the existence of both states
Reposted by Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
As apartheid was essentially a system that differentiated citizenship in one state, and getting rid of apartheid implied equal citizenship within that same state.
So in a way, insisting on apartheid also means the solution would entail one polity between the river and the sea.
Reposted by Graf Drukola πŸ§›πŸ»πŸŽ—οΈβ€¬πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
I think the main question about the use of β€œapartheid” rather than something like β€œsegregation under occupation” is about future perspectives. If one interprets the situation as occupation that should be solved via Palestinian independence alongside an Israeli state, then apartheid doesn’t fit.
Thank you for formulating that so clearly. It goes also backwards in time. If you call it apartheid, you think of it as one state instead of two states of which one struggles to be founded/fully materialise.
Calling it apartheid implies the illegitimacy of the existence of both states