Podcast: startuptolast.com
Historians eventually discover that it was originally a way to demonstrate that it wasn't written by AI.
Historians eventually discover that it was originally a way to demonstrate that it wasn't written by AI.
I hit a breaking point when an app emailed me an AI summary of a message and then Google automatically summarized that email so I got two layers of AI between me and the message.
I hit a breaking point when an app emailed me an AI summary of a message and then Google automatically summarized that email so I got two layers of AI between me and the message.
They aren't! Their revenue is up. This info is public and readily available. Stock go down != Revenue go down. Come on people, can we have just a bit of media and financial literacy?
They aren't! Their revenue is up. This info is public and readily available. Stock go down != Revenue go down. Come on people, can we have just a bit of media and financial literacy?
Don't trust people who talk that way.
Don't trust people who talk that way.
Definitely an amazing tool, and I want to keep getting better at using it. But thankfully I'm not getting "we're all out of a job" vibes just yet.
Definitely an amazing tool, and I want to keep getting better at using it. But thankfully I'm not getting "we're all out of a job" vibes just yet.
Except then I realized it came out in 2012. God I'm old.
Except then I realized it came out in 2012. God I'm old.
But, an often overlooked use of A/B tests is to make sure you're not fucking up. My goal with a test is to have inconclusive results so I can safely pick which variation I prefer.
(2/2)
But, an often overlooked use of A/B tests is to make sure you're not fucking up. My goal with a test is to have inconclusive results so I can safely pick which variation I prefer.
"Ship it now and we'll fix the issues later"
"But we won't get around to fixing them if we don't do it now"
"That means they're not worth doing now either"
The logic is correct but with this approach you never make anything good.
there's mountains of rationale as to why you should do that but i've never seen it work and it always turns the company into a painful place to work
nothing going on right now changes this
"Ship it now and we'll fix the issues later"
"But we won't get around to fixing them if we don't do it now"
"That means they're not worth doing now either"
The logic is correct but with this approach you never make anything good.
I think this will be the endgame for any entity that wants to preserve the integrity of its testing processes including job interviews. It’s too difficult to outpace AI-based cheating at this point.
i really do not
please stop asking me to select a plan and add credit card before i even know what your product does
that goes AFTER you've given me the aha moment
i really do not
please stop asking me to select a plan and add credit card before i even know what your product does
that goes AFTER you've given me the aha moment
So that was a lie. There are Mac apps that exist just to help you uninstall other Mac apps because once they're installed, they're impossible to get rid of!
Just figured out how to erase it. Good riddance.
So that was a lie. There are Mac apps that exist just to help you uninstall other Mac apps because once they're installed, they're impossible to get rid of!
For example, we're building a mobile app right now, about 15 years "late". It's fine.
we'll just wait - most ideas that seem good are not very good
and any that are we'll add a month later - ty for doing the work nerds
For example, we're building a mobile app right now, about 15 years "late". It's fine.
But is this the first time that younger generations seem to agree with old people that culture used to be better? Most young people I meet wish they could have grown up in the 90s like me.
But is this the first time that younger generations seem to agree with old people that culture used to be better? Most young people I meet wish they could have grown up in the 90s like me.
Ironically, his dev ops work got *better* after making the switch.
Why? Because now we work on projects based on need.
Ironically, his dev ops work got *better* after making the switch.
Why? Because now we work on projects based on need.
How is Google so good at tech and so bad at product?
How is Google so good at tech and so bad at product?
Not sure why it's happening more now, but I won't complain.
Not sure why it's happening more now, but I won't complain.