Mike Bowers
themikebowers.com
Mike Bowers
@themikebowers.com
An introvert that loves technology, a Southerner without an accent. I'm full of contradictions.
November 29, 2025 at 8:34 PM
I just love that he thought he was so slick and he got virtually every bit of that information wrong.
Here’s the line in question. I have many issues with this, mainly:

-Project Pat is not from Three 6 Mafia. He’s Juicy J’s brother, but he’s not part of the group.

-Unless I’m forgetting, the line is from “Ho” by Ludacris. Pat used the “ho into a housewife” line but not “hoes don’t act right.”
November 29, 2025 at 12:09 AM
Here’s the line in question. I have many issues with this, mainly:

-Project Pat is not from Three 6 Mafia. He’s Juicy J’s brother, but he’s not part of the group.

-Unless I’m forgetting, the line is from “Ho” by Ludacris. Pat used the “ho into a housewife” line but not “hoes don’t act right.”
November 29, 2025 at 12:08 AM
This is a long, convoluted way for him to say he’s going to try and prosecute Hunter Biden since his other boogeymen have gotten their cases thrown out
so none of what he’s saying is real btw
November 28, 2025 at 11:05 PM
Reposted by Mike Bowers
November 26, 2025 at 3:57 AM
See?
I don’t like this idea
November 25, 2025 at 3:18 AM
I don’t like this idea
November 25, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Titty McMillan coming through again!
November 25, 2025 at 3:16 AM
Even better: the replies from the techbros who are defending this.
November 25, 2025 at 2:56 AM
So wait…these dudes sold an idea that AI could provide folks with detailed meeting notes, but the “demo” was really just them taking notes themselves? And they admitted to this publicly?
Founders on LinkedIn still seem to be struggling with the difference between telling people about their humble beginnings and admitting to straight up committing fraud.
November 25, 2025 at 2:50 AM
And let’s remember this is all because he and others told fellow service members they didn’t have to break the law.
the trump admin wants to pick a fight about the military code with a guy who has this resume?

cool. lets go.
November 25, 2025 at 12:08 AM
November 25, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Update: this was a really bad idea
This is incredibly sad, but it does give me an idea…

Grok, draft me a version of The Aristocrats joke…
Everything about this might be the saddest thing I’ve ever seen
November 24, 2025 at 11:58 PM
This is incredibly sad, but it does give me an idea…

Grok, draft me a version of The Aristocrats joke…
Everything about this might be the saddest thing I’ve ever seen
November 24, 2025 at 11:56 PM
Reposted by Mike Bowers
Everything about this might be the saddest thing I’ve ever seen
November 24, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Remember when Trump’s classified docs case got thrown out by that sycophant in Florida who rejected decades of precedent and ruled the Special Counsel appointment was illegal? Her opinion was quoted in this dismissal. I love it.
November 24, 2025 at 6:36 PM
You just hate to see it…
NEW: Judge Currie finds that Lindsay Halligan was UNLAWFULLY APPOINTED and dismisses the James Comey and Letitia James indictments without prejudice. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
November 24, 2025 at 6:02 PM
This is so incredibly stupid and amazing
ACC after dark
November 22, 2025 at 4:25 AM
Can I also say… Waiting to drop this until the day before you’re cheating ex fiancé is book releases is an epic level of pettiness and spite
November 22, 2025 at 1:11 AM
I'd say this is the ultimate litmus test on decency, but we already know how folks will respond.
November 20, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Also, a reminder that the judge/alleged "judicial activist" who wrote the majority opinion is a TRUMP appointee.
There's no better way to argue something wasn't discriminatory than to randomly interject an anti-Semetic trope in your writing. This is Scalia-level butthurt here.
I dunno, man, if I began an opinion with a 3+ page "Preliminary Statement" complaining about disrespectful conduct by the other two judges on the panel, I would not immediately follow it up with this:
November 19, 2025 at 9:33 PM
There's no better way to argue something wasn't discriminatory than to randomly interject an anti-Semetic trope in your writing. This is Scalia-level butthurt here.
I dunno, man, if I began an opinion with a 3+ page "Preliminary Statement" complaining about disrespectful conduct by the other two judges on the panel, I would not immediately follow it up with this:
November 19, 2025 at 9:28 PM
But not as bad as this!
Breaking on MS NOW:

The full grand jury never reviewed the indictment it handed up against Comey.

Prosecutors said, instead of presenting a new indictment after the grand jury declined to approve one of the counts, Halligan simply brought an altered version for the grand jury's foreperson to sign.
November 19, 2025 at 7:29 PM
This seems bad
BREAKING: Prosecutors in the Comey case just told the judge that they’re under orders from the Deputy Attorney Generals’s office not to disclose whether career prosecutors wrote a memo recommending *against* indicting Comey prior to Halligan going to the grand jury.
November 19, 2025 at 7:28 PM