Rory Turnbull
@roryturnbull.bsky.social
1.6K followers 1.7K following 270 posts
Senior Lecturer in Phonetics and Phonology at Newcastle University ✦ Bahá’í ✦ Scottish ✦ he/him ✦ I like bikes, network science, R, and Linux
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Is Feyerabend praising... Mao's Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution? That didn't age well surely
Agreed, it's a really odd premise!
Yeah that's sort of his thing. The books make a big deal of it, he travels only with his toothbrush, apparently.
Reposted by Rory Turnbull
They're just jealous that we've improved upon the Bûche de Noël
Yeah it's relatively transparent. I've seen it in at least one paper written by a US academic!
I've discovered it's alive and well in the northeast of England, which is another datapoint in my "Northumberland is really just southern Scotland" thesis.
Oh, that's frustrating. Good luck!
I think they technically still exist - you can ask for one from the bank - but I haven't personally seen cheques in practical use for at least 15 years.
Reposted by Rory Turnbull
On the left is a rabbit. On the right is an elephant. But guess what: They’re the *same image*, rotated 90°!

In @currentbiology.bsky.social, @chazfirestone.bsky.social & I show how these images—known as “visual anagrams”—can help solve a longstanding problem in cognitive science. bit.ly/45BVnCZ
In Scottish English, yes. Minimal pairs like lock~loch, peck~pech, nicked~nicht. As well as in native Germanic words the /x/ often shows up in Greek loans like epoch and arachnid.
Took me a moment to realise that this was about the vowels and not about the /k/~/x/ contrast 😅
Yeah I'd expect /k/ for those words with "ch". Thanks for sharing, I don't recognize most of these words!
Okay I have to know what these 7 minimal pairs for HH vs NG are!
Yes, absolutely there's an interaction. In the experiment we tried to avoid influences by having everything be auditory - the participants never saw any of the words we were testing, they only heard them. But of course there is likely still something affecting it.
In phonetics we're usually interested in the pronunciation of a word, not how that pronunciation is represented in writing, so the spelling is less important. People are able to hear and perceive new words even if they don't know how they're spelt, and illiterate people can still speak.
Thanks, this is an interesting trail. It looks like a minority of people also call it "Southern Standard British English", just to keep us on our toes.
But yeah there's a lot to unpack here, both in terms of how the sounds are actually pronounced and in terms of how language users conceive of them.
The silent 'e' shouldn't account for much because, well, it's silent. Some consonants are, in theory, quite different - compare peel/pile: the English /l/ sound is much more vowelly than the French one; or in seat/site the /t/ is often glottalized in English.
I thought it predated his work but I could be wrong, I haven't read everything he's written!
Yeah, fish/fiche was more similar than seat/site. But niece/Nice was rated even more similar than either of those two, so it's not just the vowels - likely the consonants are involved too.
Does anyone have a sense of the origins of the term "Standard Southern British English" (SSBE)? It seems to have developed as an alternative to "RP" but I'm not sure who popularised it (if anyone).
Reposted by Rory Turnbull
Keep your cats indoors and switch to Linux.