Kevin Bonham
@kevinbonham.bsky.social
6.2K followers 210 following 3.8K posts
Psephologist, polling analyst and poll transparency advocate, political commentator, ecologist, chess player/admin. No party loyalties. Not-A-Pollster.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Voting intention and leadership Qs are generally asked before issue Qs. I assume that was the case here
kevinbonham.bsky.social
My last-election preferences aggregate post Resolve 55.8 to ALP (-0.1)
kevinbonham.bsky.social
It's a very poor polling question.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
#ResolvePM This question if correctly quoted is unsatisfactory; its results should be ignored. Presents one side of the debate only, and also refers to L-NP reducing immigration when it is not the government and there is no way yet of knowing when or if it again will be.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
#ResolvePM ALP 34 L-NP 28 Green 11 ON 12 IND 9 other 7

Their 2PP 55.0 to ALP (respondent prefs)
My 2025 prefs estimate 55.5 to ALP
kevinbonham.bsky.social
The worst part of that op ed - against stiff and plentiful competition - is him calling immigration a "disgraceful vote-stacking operation" (which he immediately contradicts by referencing economic benefits) What's disgraceful FYI Steve Price is making accusations like that with no evidence.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
that being another reason why he got dumped
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Teals don't win or much affect results in "middle suburbs". Preference deals concern HTV cards only which have little overall impact on preference flows. What is happening in the middle suburbs is that Labor is beating the Coalition on primary votes by 5%.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
"The Coalition has basically been wiped out in the middle suburbs [..] beaten by a combination of teals and preference deals installing a raft of Labor candidates". This is denialism about what has actually occurred.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Abbott was so bad as PM that his own socially conservative side of the party were plotting to dump him after less than 18 months - including Hastie's predecessor in Canning the late Don Randall. He's got considerably weirder since.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Almost all the oppositions are.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
It is quite remarkable that that gap stacks up so well historically given that these days Labor have to deal with Greens competition for their Senate primary vote. It is another indicator of how lopsided the 2025 election was.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
That 5.22% was exactly the same as Labor's median (as opposed to nationwide) primary vote margin per seat in the Reps, further confirming that the national 2.74% primary vote gap in the Reps was dragged down by competition from indies.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Something that has escaped most attention re the lopsidedness of this year's election: Labor beat the Coalition's Senate primary by 5.22%. This was Labor's second highest margin since 1953 (behind 1983's 5.52%) and their 5th highest ever.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Ingleburn is a suburb in Sydney that is in Hughes on the edge of Macarthur. Various sources maintain that some of it is actually in Macarthur but I'm struggling to verify. Anyway it is not in Hume.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
The things one finds. While recalculating enrolment stats for an article I noticed that in the September gazetted enrolments the division of Hume appears under the name of ... Ingleburn.

www.aec.gov.au/Enrolling_to...
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Note that this is actually Redbridge-Accent, not standalone Redbridge. The same combo as the very successful marginal seat tracking poll this year.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
14 is high compared to other pollsters, but One Nation has been rising lately in every poll series.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Noting that I am not yet applying a house effect to Redbridge, my 2PP aggregate following Redbridge is 55.9 to ALP (-0.6)
kevinbonham.bsky.social
This 14% is to my knowledge the highest One Nation has been in any reputable national poll since June-July 1998. (During that time they had two 14.5s and a 14 in Morgan and a 14 in Nielsen.)
kevinbonham.bsky.social
All three Redbridges so far this term have been low for Labor cf my aggregate of other polls, with their very high ON readings contributing. However the difference is only weakly statistically significant in isolation so I'll wait for more evidence here.