Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
@johnathanmulroony.bsky.social
Canadian.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Amtrak being priced so close to plane tickets so often is one of those things where it feels like they don't actually want anyone to use it
cap the tickets you fuckers. not all of us are business travelers who can just expense our shit to the paper pushing finance companies we work for
November 20, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Amtrak being priced so close to plane tickets so often is one of those things where it feels like they don't actually want anyone to use it
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Your bill violates human rights protections? Notwithstanding clause. Need to bust a union? Notwithstanding clause. Want to go against the will of parliament in your minority government? Notwithstanding clause.
November 20, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Your bill violates human rights protections? Notwithstanding clause. Need to bust a union? Notwithstanding clause. Want to go against the will of parliament in your minority government? Notwithstanding clause.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Canada's notwithstanding clause has to be done away with or, at the very least, heavily modified. It has become a way for parties to circumvent the courts consequence-free.
November 20, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Canada's notwithstanding clause has to be done away with or, at the very least, heavily modified. It has become a way for parties to circumvent the courts consequence-free.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
the only good thing about genAI is that it got me to really love seeing bad art, because I know a person put in time and effort, made themselves vulnerable by showing it to others, and is trying to improve. I value that more than anything now
November 20, 2025 at 12:51 AM
the only good thing about genAI is that it got me to really love seeing bad art, because I know a person put in time and effort, made themselves vulnerable by showing it to others, and is trying to improve. I value that more than anything now
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
When I was watching XPlay, this Mountain Dew ad came on where this guy forcefemmes transgenderizes his homie.
November 19, 2025 at 7:40 PM
When I was watching XPlay, this Mountain Dew ad came on where this guy forcefemmes transgenderizes his homie.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
NEW: Cryptocurrencies have lost >$1 TRILLION in market value since Oct. 6.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Crypto World Wipes Out $1 Trillion as Bitcoin Plunges Anew
The great crypto crash of 2025 entered a new phase on Wednesday, as Bitcoin plunged to its lowest level in seven months, extending the more than $1 trillion wipeout across the digital‑asset world.
www.bloomberg.com
November 19, 2025 at 9:51 PM
NEW: Cryptocurrencies have lost >$1 TRILLION in market value since Oct. 6.
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
My unwokest take is it was silly for STALKER 2 to change the spelling of Chernobyl because of Russia's invasion. It's always been Chernobyl in English.
November 19, 2025 at 11:13 PM
My unwokest take is it was silly for STALKER 2 to change the spelling of Chernobyl because of Russia's invasion. It's always been Chernobyl in English.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Going to my bank to try to get them to waive the fees but I doubt it’s gonna happen and now I’m out $100 bucks from purchases over the last two months.
But just FYI to anyone who took advantage of the 11.11 sale. Basically negated anything I would’ve saved.
But just FYI to anyone who took advantage of the 11.11 sale. Basically negated anything I would’ve saved.
November 19, 2025 at 2:34 AM
Going to my bank to try to get them to waive the fees but I doubt it’s gonna happen and now I’m out $100 bucks from purchases over the last two months.
But just FYI to anyone who took advantage of the 11.11 sale. Basically negated anything I would’ve saved.
But just FYI to anyone who took advantage of the 11.11 sale. Basically negated anything I would’ve saved.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Hey, so heads up if you bought things from Aliexpress with a credit card, because of new tariff stuff, you may have been charged an additional $10 for EVERY transaction, this includes purchases even lower than $10.
Pay with your Paypal balance instead, but pissed off.
www.reddit.com/r/Aliexpress...
Pay with your Paypal balance instead, but pissed off.
www.reddit.com/r/Aliexpress...
November 19, 2025 at 2:34 AM
Hey, so heads up if you bought things from Aliexpress with a credit card, because of new tariff stuff, you may have been charged an additional $10 for EVERY transaction, this includes purchases even lower than $10.
Pay with your Paypal balance instead, but pissed off.
www.reddit.com/r/Aliexpress...
Pay with your Paypal balance instead, but pissed off.
www.reddit.com/r/Aliexpress...
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
This is a nuts story. An AI chatbot and image platform left millions of images exposed. They show what people are actually using the AI for: taking random women's yearbook, graduation, and social media photos and making super realistic hardcore porn with them
www.404media.co/ai-porn-secr...
www.404media.co/ai-porn-secr...
Massive Leak Shows Erotic Chatbot Users Turned Women’s Yearbook Pictures Into AI Porn
Chatbot roleplay and image generator platform SecretDesires.ai left cloud storage containers of nearly two million of images and videos exposed, including photos and full names of women from social me...
www.404media.co
November 19, 2025 at 3:28 PM
This is a nuts story. An AI chatbot and image platform left millions of images exposed. They show what people are actually using the AI for: taking random women's yearbook, graduation, and social media photos and making super realistic hardcore porn with them
www.404media.co/ai-porn-secr...
www.404media.co/ai-porn-secr...
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Incredibly Cool™️ that Arc Raiders is sparking this mindset across the internet so much.
Really Awesome™️ that people now think already underpaid voice actors deserve even less! Super great job!
Really Awesome™️ that people now think already underpaid voice actors deserve even less! Super great job!
Damn I had no idea my voice actor friends were "paid too much" when they provide work that can literally make or break a character in a video game but interesting thought there hm
November 19, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Incredibly Cool™️ that Arc Raiders is sparking this mindset across the internet so much.
Really Awesome™️ that people now think already underpaid voice actors deserve even less! Super great job!
Really Awesome™️ that people now think already underpaid voice actors deserve even less! Super great job!
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Today, the judge asked how many grand jurors were present when the second indictment was handed up (and when the amendment to the report re: the original was made).
AUSA Lemons said only the foreperson and one other grand juror were present when the docs were handed up.
AUSA Lemons said only the foreperson and one other grand juror were present when the docs were handed up.
November 19, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Today, the judge asked how many grand jurors were present when the second indictment was handed up (and when the amendment to the report re: the original was made).
AUSA Lemons said only the foreperson and one other grand juror were present when the docs were handed up.
AUSA Lemons said only the foreperson and one other grand juror were present when the docs were handed up.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
BUT the original indictment w/ the pencilled-in amendment is not the operative charging document in the case.
The operative indictment is the second one, which the grand jury did not vote on.
What’s more, the amendment to the original indictment was not made in the presence of the grand jury.
The operative indictment is the second one, which the grand jury did not vote on.
What’s more, the amendment to the original indictment was not made in the presence of the grand jury.
November 19, 2025 at 7:12 PM
BUT the original indictment w/ the pencilled-in amendment is not the operative charging document in the case.
The operative indictment is the second one, which the grand jury did not vote on.
What’s more, the amendment to the original indictment was not made in the presence of the grand jury.
The operative indictment is the second one, which the grand jury did not vote on.
What’s more, the amendment to the original indictment was not made in the presence of the grand jury.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
That confused the magistrate because there seemed to be a facial discrepancy between the two documents handed up by the foreperson.
So, for the record, she had the foreperson pencil in an amendment to the grand jury’s no bill report, specifying that the no bill was to Count 1.
So, for the record, she had the foreperson pencil in an amendment to the grand jury’s no bill report, specifying that the no bill was to Count 1.
November 19, 2025 at 7:11 PM
That confused the magistrate because there seemed to be a facial discrepancy between the two documents handed up by the foreperson.
So, for the record, she had the foreperson pencil in an amendment to the grand jury’s no bill report, specifying that the no bill was to Count 1.
So, for the record, she had the foreperson pencil in an amendment to the grand jury’s no bill report, specifying that the no bill was to Count 1.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
More: The original indictment—the one the grand jury did see and vote on—was also handed up in open court along with the second indictment.
But, as noted, the document was marked as though the grand jury had returned a no bill as to the entire indictment, not just Count 1.
But, as noted, the document was marked as though the grand jury had returned a no bill as to the entire indictment, not just Count 1.
November 19, 2025 at 7:11 PM
More: The original indictment—the one the grand jury did see and vote on—was also handed up in open court along with the second indictment.
But, as noted, the document was marked as though the grand jury had returned a no bill as to the entire indictment, not just Count 1.
But, as noted, the document was marked as though the grand jury had returned a no bill as to the entire indictment, not just Count 1.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
4. But that second indictment was never presented to or voted on by the grand jury
Instead, the foreperson and Halligan signed it, and it was handed up in open court.
The result is that the operative indictment in the Comey case is one that the grand jury did not actually vote on.
Instead, the foreperson and Halligan signed it, and it was handed up in open court.
The result is that the operative indictment in the Comey case is one that the grand jury did not actually vote on.
November 19, 2025 at 6:30 PM
4. But that second indictment was never presented to or voted on by the grand jury
Instead, the foreperson and Halligan signed it, and it was handed up in open court.
The result is that the operative indictment in the Comey case is one that the grand jury did not actually vote on.
Instead, the foreperson and Halligan signed it, and it was handed up in open court.
The result is that the operative indictment in the Comey case is one that the grand jury did not actually vote on.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
3. Meanwhile, someone (??) conveyed news of the no bill on Count 1 to Halligan (or her office).
Halligan’s office then drafted a new, two-count indictment that removed Count 1 from the original indictment presented to the grand jury.
Halligan’s office then drafted a new, two-count indictment that removed Count 1 from the original indictment presented to the grand jury.
November 19, 2025 at 6:30 PM
3. Meanwhile, someone (??) conveyed news of the no bill on Count 1 to Halligan (or her office).
Halligan’s office then drafted a new, two-count indictment that removed Count 1 from the original indictment presented to the grand jury.
Halligan’s office then drafted a new, two-count indictment that removed Count 1 from the original indictment presented to the grand jury.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
2. After deliberations, the grand jury foreperson informed the EDVA grand jury coordinator that there were not enough votes to indict on Count 1 of the three-count indictment.
However, the entire document was then marked as though the grand jury had declined to return an indictment on all counts.
However, the entire document was then marked as though the grand jury had declined to return an indictment on all counts.
November 19, 2025 at 6:30 PM
2. After deliberations, the grand jury foreperson informed the EDVA grand jury coordinator that there were not enough votes to indict on Count 1 of the three-count indictment.
However, the entire document was then marked as though the grand jury had declined to return an indictment on all counts.
However, the entire document was then marked as though the grand jury had declined to return an indictment on all counts.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
1. Halligan presented the original indictment with three counts against Comey. The grand jury deliberated for roughly two hours and took a vote.
November 19, 2025 at 6:30 PM
1. Halligan presented the original indictment with three counts against Comey. The grand jury deliberated for roughly two hours and took a vote.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
The facts are complicated, but here’s a summary of what appears to have happened based on the filings and today’s hearing:
NEWS: During a hearing in federal court in VA, prosecutors confirmed that the operative indictment in the case against James Comey was never shown to or voted on by the entire grand jury before it was presented in open court.
Defense counsel argued that’s a complete bar to further prosecution
Defense counsel argued that’s a complete bar to further prosecution
November 19, 2025 at 6:30 PM
The facts are complicated, but here’s a summary of what appears to have happened based on the filings and today’s hearing:
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Link's perma ban is wrong and should be reversed.
And what illustrates it being EVEN MORE WRONG, are recent suspensions with restoration with much much more egregious offenses in the same line of what Bluesky claims Link was banned over.
FREE LINK.
And what illustrates it being EVEN MORE WRONG, are recent suspensions with restoration with much much more egregious offenses in the same line of what Bluesky claims Link was banned over.
FREE LINK.
November 18, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Link's perma ban is wrong and should be reversed.
And what illustrates it being EVEN MORE WRONG, are recent suspensions with restoration with much much more egregious offenses in the same line of what Bluesky claims Link was banned over.
FREE LINK.
And what illustrates it being EVEN MORE WRONG, are recent suspensions with restoration with much much more egregious offenses in the same line of what Bluesky claims Link was banned over.
FREE LINK.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
It's annoying to me that adults who have nothing better to do are cleaning out TCG packs like this purely for a money grab. Kids can't even buy them because a bunch of losers who probably trade crypto need more cash.
November 18, 2025 at 11:03 PM
It's annoying to me that adults who have nothing better to do are cleaning out TCG packs like this purely for a money grab. Kids can't even buy them because a bunch of losers who probably trade crypto need more cash.
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Ezra Klein's entire "abundance" shtick is just reheated early 2000s vibes-based deregulatory corporatism
its primary function is to preempt good faith progressive reform as THE answer to authoritarianism
because the extraction class don't want corporate accountability or to pay taxes
its primary function is to preempt good faith progressive reform as THE answer to authoritarianism
because the extraction class don't want corporate accountability or to pay taxes
November 19, 2025 at 12:12 PM
Ezra Klein's entire "abundance" shtick is just reheated early 2000s vibes-based deregulatory corporatism
its primary function is to preempt good faith progressive reform as THE answer to authoritarianism
because the extraction class don't want corporate accountability or to pay taxes
its primary function is to preempt good faith progressive reform as THE answer to authoritarianism
because the extraction class don't want corporate accountability or to pay taxes
Reposted by Joseph Blowseph and 269 others
Jesus to his disciples:
Idk why a bunch of libs started following me but I’m an anarchist and you will not have a good time here.
November 19, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Jesus to his disciples: