Jacob Aron
@jjaron.bsky.social
4.9K followers 2.9K following 2.7K posts
News editor at New Scientist. I read a lot of books, and recommend the best ones to you
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jjaron.bsky.social
I used to share book recommendations on the other place but got out of the habit this year as engagement massively dropped off. Thinking about putting together my top 10 list for this year though, so as a test, like this, and for each like I'll recommend something great I read in the past 5 years
jjaron.bsky.social
I love that The Big Dog Theory has left Stephen Fry essentially unkillable #CelebrityTraitors
Reposted by Jacob Aron
stevenperkins.bsky.social
Celia Imrie farting on national television justifies the licence fee tbh #CelebrityTraitors
Reposted by Jacob Aron
katebevan.com
Celia has absolutely elevated herself to National Treasure status with that fart #CelebrityTraitors
Reposted by Jacob Aron
amandamull.bsky.social
The problem of tech people not understanding why normal people do things is longstanding, but in this case: people who read long business stories do it *because* they want the stuff the company might not want to tell you. The audience for anything else is just the subject’s friends and employees
rmac.bsky.social
this is the dumbest shit i have ever read
Reposted by Jacob Aron
rmac.bsky.social
this is the dumbest shit i have ever read
jjaron.bsky.social
Many seem to have forgotten that signing a bit of paper is the easy bit - you actually have to *do* something afterwards
jjaron.bsky.social
I get it, it's just not the model. It's like saying you want to pay $10 to watch a specific show on Netflix - that's not going to be on offer!
jjaron.bsky.social
Big Eel doesn't want you to know
jjaron.bsky.social
The suggestion was $10 per *article*
jjaron.bsky.social
Sure, $10 an article might start to work for publishers, but at that point I don't think you'd get many people purchasing! At one point we (New Scientist) sold individual issue access through our app but I think we stopped, presumably because there wasn't much demand.
Reposted by Jacob Aron
georgeosborn.bsky.social
The AI economy is like trying to tell that mate of yours who never buys a pint that it's their turn to buy a round, except that when they say they don't have their card on them the entire economy crashes
edzitron.com
This isn’t even close to a plan! Why is this being reported as a “five year plan” when it’s a series of vague ideas?
OpenAI is working on new revenue lines, debt partnerships and further fundraising as part of a five-year plan to make good on the more than $1tn in spending it has pledged to create world-leading artificial intelligence.
OpenAI is planning on deals to serve governments and businesses with more bespoke products, creating more income from new shopping tools, and new sales from its video creation service Sora and AI agents, said multiple people familiar with the start-up’s efforts.
These people said it is exploring “creative” plans to raise new debt that can help it build out its AI infrastructure, while considering becoming a supplier of computing resources via its data centre initiative Stargate.
It is also weighing ways to cash in on its intellectual property by developing new AI infrastructure, making forays into online advertising and plans to launch consumer hardware products, including a new AI-powered personal assistant device, with former Apple star designer Jony Ive.
jjaron.bsky.social
I always share this definitive piece by @jamesball.bsky.social - while the ability to buy individual articles is desirable for readers, the economics don't work for publishers. It's better to have one person take out a $100 subscription than sell 100 articles for $1 www.cjr.org/opinion/micr...
jjaron.bsky.social
Just make it up in volume
paulduane.bsky.social
'Sora cost $20 a month & subscribers can generate an unlimited number of AI videos... this costs (Sora owners) OpenAI "at least $5 per 10-second video"'.

Journalists, please ask more questions about how this tech could ever in a million years make a profit?
britthates.bsky.social
studio execs & major outlets claim AI is "inevitable" and poised to take over Hollywood. the reality is much different. i spoke with filmmakers, producers, and editors about how AI is actually showing up in productions – and what it still can't do:
Reposted by Jacob Aron
newscientist.com
What's the best gift for a science lover you've ever given or received?

Let us know below, or for the chance to be included in New Scientist’s gift guide, email [email protected] telling us about the gift, and why it was so great.
jjaron.bsky.social
Ok but why does it look like David Cameron
nytimes.com
In @nytopinion.nytimes.com

“In financial markets, a bubble occurs when the level of investment in an asset becomes persistently detached from the amount of profit that asset could plausibly generate,” Jared Bernstein and Ryan Cummings write in a guest essay. “A.I. investment fits that pattern.”
Opinion | The A.I. Bubble Looks Real
The A.I. boom is likely a speculative bubble. Like the dot-com bust and the housing crisis, its pop is going to hurt.
nyti.ms