Jemima Kelly
@jemima.bsky.social
17K followers 750 following 790 posts
Columnist and feature writer at the Financial Times. 👩🏼‍💻 https://www.ft.com/jemima-kelly Probably at a Stoke Newington drinks party.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jemima.bsky.social
I spent the day with Curtis Yarvin and the "dissident right" at a garden party in Surrey and wrote quite a few words about it.

My cover story for today’s FT Magazine

on.ft.com/4ooXS4t [GIFT LINK! 🎁]
Sunday at the garden party for Curtis Yarvin and the new, new right
[FREE TO READ] What you learn at a gathering of neoreactionaries, Very Online rightwingers and the formerly cancelled
on.ft.com
jemima.bsky.social
I’m not sure what benefit studying them from a distance as opposed to up close has though - I would have thought you get a clearer picture up close, can challenge them etc? Plus I don’t think it works like that any more - old powers that be eg media don’t decide who gets influence in the “DYOR” era
jemima.bsky.social
Tbh still not following 😅 but that might be because it's 11.30pm on a Sunday night and far past my bedtime 🌚
jemima.bsky.social
What's switched back? And which thinkers on the left do you think are getting young men under the age of about 21 excited/inspired?
jemima.bsky.social
Sorry I'm not quite following - what's not like the thinking behind the new right? I'm not suggesting that people like Yarvin are Great Thinkers, to be clear - let alone, in descending order, Thiel or bloody Andreessen
jemima.bsky.social
For this week's column I wrote about the way that the countercultural intellectual energy of the right - and lack thereof on the left - is drawing in young people, esp men, who would once have been drawn to radical leftist thinkers

on.ft.com/3L72ug5
The fashion for the young: turn to the radical right
The intellectual energy of new rightwing movements is drawing in young people
on.ft.com
jemima.bsky.social
I guess it's only interesting IF they're having an influence though? There are plenty of bizarre thinkers in the world, but nobody is talking about the ones who aren't having an impact
jemima.bsky.social
Personally I give them the time of day because, whether they are spewing bollocks or not, they are having a direct and major influence on US politics and therefore world politics. I would have thought that was quite important
huwcdavies.bsky.social
Reading Thiel, Yarvin, Peterson et al. makes you realise what passes for intellectual iconoclasm these days is all absolute bollocks. Why anyone gives any of these people the time of day let alone credibility is baffling.
jemima.bsky.social
If you want some detail see here, for instance, from 2008 which contains a lot of ideas that you can see in Trump 2.0 / MAGA / the right in 2025 keithanyan.github.io/OpenLetterTo...
keithanyan.github.io
jemima.bsky.social
Much of it is certainly weird and incoherent but that doesn't mean it's not having real influence or not worth writing about. Vance has explicitly cited Yarvin as an influence and knows him, Musk "consulted" him on his new party idea, obv Trump is not reading any of it but the people around him are
Reposted by Jemima Kelly
profhilaryallen.bsky.social
"Exploiting regulatory loopholes and bypassing national controls is the name of the game" with crypto.

"Crypto has never been about innovation, but about getting away with things you would not otherwise be able to."

Nice to hear someone else say it! @jemima.bsky.social

www.ft.com/content/dbd0...
Crypto skulduggery isn’t a bug, it’s the whole point
Exploiting regulatory loopholes is the name of the game
www.ft.com
jemima.bsky.social
The Godfather of the Dark Enlightenment / JD Vance whisperer Curtis Yarvin is back to thinking that Trump 2.0 is a failure and is considering fleeing America in the near future. I wonder where he'll head 🥴 graymirror.substack.com/p/you-cant-h...
Reposted by Jemima Kelly
tonytassell.bsky.social
@jemima.bsky.social on crypto dealings by politicians such as the Trumps and the move by Nigel Farage's Reform party to accept political donations in crypto www.ft.com/content/dbd0...
Reposted by Jemima Kelly
benansell.bsky.social
And here is the most striking one - discrimination in favour of (zero) or against (ten) white British people. Look at Reform voters. Absolutely clustering around SEVEN on this scale. Tories are on five and everyone else five or lower. So, here at least is something all Reform voters agree on. 11/n
Reposted by Jemima Kelly
Reposted by Jemima Kelly
ftedit.ft.com
The FT Edit editor's favourite story today? Jemima Kelly joining a witches’ coven: on.ft.com/4nh2LLR

📧 Sign up to the FT Edit newsletter for our daily top pick: on.ft.com/44K0XEi
jemima.bsky.social
"Grandeur of democracy" is an interesting phrase... I kind of like it but I don't think democracy necessarily has to be quite so chaotic does it? Or perhaps not quite so unwilling to find some unity while still allowing for a range of different views?
Reposted by Jemima Kelly
andrewcarrier.com
“Do you really cast bad spells on people?” I ask Aspinall. “Yes, of course I do. I call it justice,” she replies sassily. “Like, if someone kidnapped, raped and killed my sister, I’d not only hex them. I’d hex their whole family under a dark moon. Fuck. That. Shit.”

Thanks for @jemima.bsky.social.
Jemima Kelly: why I joined a witches’ coven
HTSI’s alternative wellness columnist celebrates the joy of hex
on.ft.com
Reposted by Jemima Kelly
robinwigglesworth.ft.com
LOVE @jemima.bsky.social’s latest adventures in woo woo.
financialtimes.com
Jemima Kelly on why she joined a witches’ coven: on.ft.com/3IKpxN5