Evelyn Quartz
banner
evelynquartz.bsky.social
Evelyn Quartz
@evelynquartz.bsky.social
4.3K followers 200 following 320 posts
Writer. Former Capitol Hill staffer. Oregon-based. Often in the woods with my dogs. Views my own. I write about the current political moment. Check it out: https://quartzevelyn.substack.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
My latest on government shutdowns in the attention economy era.
Yes! We must continue to ask what is truly required when we're told to protect democracy & why so many people are right to have lost faith in the narrow, procedural definition. Because it has not come with the material dignity we all deserve as human beings.
I get why it’s hard to see Trump as anything other than the singular threat. We’ve been conditioned to see politics through the democracy–fascism binary, where he’s the villain and everything against him is “saving democracy.” But that framing obscures the bigger story. My work tries to expose this.
Trump isn’t the “end” of American democracy, he’s a symptom of decades of bipartisan erosion in a system that was already failing most people. Treating him as the endpoint turns a structural crisis into a single-villain story, and that story lets the deeper rot go unchallenged. That is my argument.
What I'm really disturbed by and what few are talking about is how Democrats have been gerrymandering for years and now are using rhetoric of war and the American project to grab more power, by making seats safer for them. We cannot let them off the hook for that.
The trouble is, once that power is consolidated, Democrats rarely use it to expand economic democracy or materially improve people’s lives. Instead, they stabilize the same broken order of austerity that helped create the crisis. Calling this a defense of democracy risks gutting the term entirely.
I don’t deny the authoritarian strain in the GOP. But the liberal political and media class has an incentive to cast Trump as an unprecedented fascist, b/c it turns politics into “democracy vs. dictatorship” and lets them justify power grabs like gerrymandering as acts of noble necessity.
And before anyone comes at me for being naive or not understanding politics, please read the article. I go through the major arguments being made in favor of this and try to dispel them.
My new piece for @levernews.com, on why Democrats should NOT “fight fire with fire” when it comes to gerrymandering.

There is another, much harder but more democratic option: build a popular winning agenda.

www.levernews.com/do-as-we-say...
Do As We Say, Not As We Gerrymander
By fighting gerrymandering with gerrymandering, Democrats are betraying their own democratic principles.
www.levernews.com
Strange how Epstein becomes a bipartisan outrage only once elites can use it to score points. The people who called MAGA voters conspiratorial now claim moral clarity—without ever naming how their own class insulated him for years.
Such important reporting! The more people that can see identity politics as it's weaponized by both parties to serve corporate interests the better.
Sarah McBride became famous as Congress’s first transgender lawmaker.

She just passed her first bill — it helps private equity & hedge fund billionaires prey on the working-class.

McBride touted it as a benefit to Black women & marginalized communities. www.levernews.com/dems-hand-pr...
Dems Hand Private Equity The Equal Opportunity To Grift
A bipartisan bill passed unanimously by the House would sell out working-class investors to private equity under the guise of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
www.levernews.com
Reposted by Evelyn Quartz
BRAVA @evelynquartz.bsky.social The left doesn’t just critique the right. It offers an alternative to the center. Housing, healthcare, labor rights, public infrastructure, climate —not as technocratic reforms, but as moral commitments. That everyone deserves dignity. That care isn’t a commodity.
Why You Know the Far Right in Europe—But Not the Left
A case for why that's intentional.
open.substack.com
So it’s either a project that remains deeply undemocratic or fails due to its unpopularity with the people. As citizens and voters who care about justice and economic equality, we have to understand this for what it is and demand something better.
The problem with the mainstream “pro-democracy” movement that formed in reaction to Trump is that it protects liberal democracy while shutting down economic democracy. The lack of economic democracy is why people are rejecting liberal democracy (i.e. Trump’s second win).
My new piece argues that we must reject the false choice presented by our politics of technocratic liberalism vs. authoritarian rule.

The third option is intentionally hidden: economic democracy and a politics of agency.

quartzevelyn.substack.com/p/the-false-...
The False Choice That’s Breaking America: Symbolic Democracy or Authoritarian Rule
Neither party offers a future. It’s time to reclaim power, not just process.
quartzevelyn.substack.com
The inconvenient truth: Without economic democracy, political democracy becomes hollow. You can vote every two years, but if you have no say over your job, your landlord, your debt, your time—you are not free.

And the center-left knows this. That’s why they focus on aesthetics, not power.
You see, my concern is that it's not the authoritarianism they hate; we already have a soft version of that. But the aesthetic betrayal that Trump represents. Trump peels the mask off the "respectability" of elite governance.
Suspended civil liberties, eviscerated privacy, and militarized the homeland

Used a crisis (9/11) to consolidate executive power and criminalize dissent

Oversaw the largest transfer of wealth to defense contractors and oil companies in modern history
An honest question I have for the pro-democracy centrist movement: Was George Bush not a threat to democracy?

Was not elected by the majority, but installed by the Supreme Court

Lied the nation into war, killing hundreds of thousands

Legalized torture, detention without trial & mass surveillance
Reposted by Evelyn Quartz
I used to write talking points for House democrats. I’ve seen how these moments get turned into scripted outrage. But this isn’t a messaging failure—it’s a failure of moral and political vision. People will lose health care. And there’s no plan to stop it.