Fidget Spinnerson

Hello! Trans rights include:
- Trans women in women's spaces, cis women sent directly TO space
- Transitioning every child prior to age 6 as a global priority
- Daily trans prayers to enforce ideology
- Everyone to be referred to by every pronoun at once

I've been studying the transgender movement for many years now. The UK Government are in a tricky bind, trying to balance competing rights, international diplomacy and legal complexity. As an expert in the subject, I have determined a reasonable, fair solution to the problem:

Trans rights

Potentially! Best case scenario - They file it now for the December human rights meeting, and vote then and there in favour, the UK then being directly back under monitoring to ensure effective legal gender recognition.

Still - Expect time, and lobbying. But fingers crossed!

Unless you believe one of the TERFs Big Lies: that Goodwin is "just about pensions and marriage".

Except actually it ensures _functionally effective_ legal gender recognition with vanishingly slim exceptions. Read: National security. Not where you piss.

To be fair, the Supreme Court is going with the reasoning "Actually all of the prior courts, regulators, and even most of the government were WRONG the whole time! Whoops!"

But apparently the GRO don't need to update their documentation, and this now constitutes legal misinformation.

Here you go! October 2025. Well organised, our government services, aren't they?

Will try to get this for you asap!

Oh hey, I'm one of the people involved in this case. And we know each other from about 10 years ago! Nice to see you, get in touch :D

You deserve it. Did you know that they still send out a letter, post-SC judgment, explaining the update to one's protected characteristic of sex within the Equality Act, to be in line with their acquired gender?

Today, we and the Trans Exile Network have made a joint submission to the Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law regarding the UK Supreme Court's judgment in the For Women Scotland v. Scottish Ministers case of April 2025.

tacc.org.uk/2025/10/14/p...

Threatening to sue them into the ground. Accusing them of working for trans activists. Making a death threat. Being asked to calm down and screaming profanity instead. "If you cuff me I swear to god I'll be a problem" - My brother in Christ you are the embodiment of why that protocol exists.

Not surprised. She has to run with this now, considering that she's committed the same offense, though at least with the foresight of a few layers of indirection for 'plausible deniability'.

Finally acknowledges the man so she can pilfer the ragebait hype when she's in trouble for it, too.

To be fair - Given how Linehan ruined any reasonable defence in his police interview through:

- Admission of responsibility for communications
- Admission of anti-trans motivation
- Immediate publication of those facts online

I imagine his lawyers MUST run with the "it wasn't x, it was y" defence.

Is it likely the interview will have been recorded? And are police interviews subject to FOI?

Excellent work. I believe strongly that hate movements gain strength when they have impunity. Failing to enforce due to "political" sentiment is just the police equivalent of businesses focus on short-term profit. Easy in short term, fucking catastrophic in the long term.

I hear you're an inmate now, blatherer

Tick tock, Falkner.

We requested an internal review into missing communications from our prior FOI.

The EHRC are now delaying the internal review, citing a 20-day extension without giving any lawful justification. Reviews should conclude in 20 working days, extended only in exceptional cases. No reason was given.