Didi Ⓥ
@dididelacy.bsky.social
4K followers
4.5K following
890 posts
❤️ Animal, Human Rights & Environment. 🇦🇺🇺🇦
When I look into the eyes of an animal, I do not see an animal. I see a living being. I see a friend. I feel a soul. ADW
https://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/earthlings/
https://www.dominionmovement.com/watch
Posts
Media
Videos
Starter Packs
Pinned
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
This dismissal opinion on a failed ICE arrest that @seamushughes.bsky.social found is worth reading in its entirety. Come for the debunking of DHS "fiction," stay for the snark about wiener dog, but definitely take time to read the 18 USC 111 analysis.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
![The sworn affidavit submitted in support of the Criminal Complaint in this matter tells a
very different—and largely fictional—story. For example, Special Agent Steven Fuentes of ICE,
HSI, and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) swore to the following:
On June 20, 2025, [HSI, ICE-ERO, and TxDPS] were conducting
surveillance at a residence on Benrus, in San Antonio, Texas, in the Western
District of Texas. Database checks indicated that Jaime Albert
QUINTANILLA-Chavez, with a Final Order of Removal from an
Immigration Judge, was residing at the above address. At approximately
0715 a.m., QUINTANILLA exited the residence and entered a white Dodge
Ram. The Dodge Ram was towing a trailer containing construction
equipment. Both license plates for the truck and trailer were expired.
ECF No. 1 ¶ 2 (emphasis added). Fuentes also swore that (1) the Defendant refused to “follow any
commands”; (2) after the Defendant was blocked in between the officers’ vehicles, he was given
“multiple verbal commands to exit the vehicle”; and (3) the Defendant “fought the law
enforcement officers.” Id. ¶¶ 3–4. Fuentes further testified at the preliminary hearing that the
Defendant was surveilled (and taken into custody) because he was subject to a Final Order of
Removal from an Immigration Judge. See ECF No. 12, 6/26 Preliminary Hr’g Tr. at 4:20–25.
Despite HSI’s sworn statement to the Magistrate Judge that the vehicle was stopped
because of expired license plates, the Assistant U.S. Attorney conceded at a bond hearing in July
2025 that Fuentes had “misrepresented what was going on.” ECF No. 29, 7/10 Hr’g Tr. at 8:12–](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:bbp2b224lro3bfnzcqwwnkfo/bafkreie6x3oqkmgiyywtsyowz35tyuqw2ra27hpaxj2h2npzdlaskrurjm@jpeg)
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
![12 While courts must allow law enforcement “officers to draw on their own experience and specialized training” to
assess the circumstances, SA Carl’s inferences about the situation—based on his unfounded assumption that he was
executing a warrant and that the Defendant was subject to an order of removal—are not entitled to such deference.
Arvizu, 534 U.S. at 273. Indeed, DO Hernandez appears to have misled his own team by concealing that there was no
order of removal for the Defendant nor warrant for his arrest. DO Hernandez also acknowledged at the hearing that
he has verbal instructions from superiors to break car windows. See ECF No. 60, 8/25 Hr’g Tr. at 72:15–23. “[G]ood
faith on the part of the arresting officers is not enough.’” Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 96 (1964) (quoting Henry v.
United States, 361 U.S. 98, 102 (1959)). “If subjective good faith alone were the test, the protections of the Fourth
Amendment would evaporate, and the people would be ‘secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,’ only in
the discretion of the police.” Id. at 97.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:bbp2b224lro3bfnzcqwwnkfo/bafkreiae664gdrpgslyeee6oibajs3volm27vdls6ennm6otd2hirixv5y@jpeg)
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Mike Johnson dismisses Democrats criticizing Trump's lawless strikes on boats: "They are motivated out of fear and Trump derangement syndrome."
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Mike Johnson says he will not bring the House back in session until the government reopens
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
Reposted by Didi Ⓥ
