ME/CFS research
@cfsresearch.bsky.social
470 followers 74 following 710 posts
Interested in research into ME/CFS/MECFS, FND and related conditions. https://medium.com/@cfs_research
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by ME/CFS research
drzoffness.bsky.social
Upcoming talk for the disability & chronic pain community on the science of pain and how to heal with @birdability.bsky.social - talk is free & accessible to all 💥💥💥

When: Mon 10/20 @ 7pm ET/4pm PT
Where: birdability.org

Join us!! 🙏🏼
#medsky #neuroskyence #disability #scisky 🧪
Reposted by ME/CFS research
mecfsskeptic.bsky.social
1) 🇬🇧 For ME/CFS patients in the UK only: Action for ME has opened its 2025 Big Survey! Last time, it had more than 4000 respondents, but hopefully this one will be even bigger.

The deadline for submitting your response is 27 January 2026.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
This looks like a good study without any conflicts of interest. Would really need to see LC patients at 6 and 12 months, more healthy controls, and compare covid recovered patients to see if this is actually a factor in LC.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
There isn't really any evidence showing that HR monitoring reduces PEM. The previous NICE guidelines and PACE trial used it for GET, and workwell also recommends using it for GET, but there is no evidence that it helps. The one study that looked at it found that it didn't help avoid PEM.
Reposted by ME/CFS research
mecfsskeptic.bsky.social
1) The Physios for ME team published a randomized trial on pacing with a heart rate monitor. It included 32 patients with ME/CFS and 15 with Long Covid.

A brief breakdown of the main results 🧵
cfsresearch.bsky.social
Also significant conflict of interest there.
Reposted by ME/CFS research
There must be well over 100 ME/CFS biomarker studies, all claiming success – but none have been replicated.

And that's probably no better bet for forgetting media coverage either – it makes such a nice story (every time).
cgatist.bsky.social
The research used to claim reliability of a ME/CFS blood test has important limitations, shown here.

www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
Three possible confounders in a study proposing an ME/CFS blood test : sex/age, batch and inactivity/severity. Better designed studies by independent researchers are necessary.
Reposted by ME/CFS research
mecfsskeptic.bsky.social
1) There's a new ME/CFS study that is getting a lot of attention in the media. It focuses on epigenetics: how genes are switched on or off by folding DNA in a different way.

You genetic code itself is fixed but the expression of genes can change by environmental factors.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
We get a few stories like this every year. Since the 90s there have been stories about blood tests that “prove” it is real.
Reposted by ME/CFS research
cgatist.bsky.social
The research used to claim reliability of a ME/CFS blood test has important limitations, shown here.

www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
Three possible confounders in a study proposing an ME/CFS blood test : sex/age, batch and inactivity/severity. Better designed studies by independent researchers are necessary.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
Oh, and the authors have a patent for the technique used in the study.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
This kind of stuff just irritates me, as it's a waste of time and money. Let's look at the brain and try to find what is going wrong, rather than looking to prove a hypothesis.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
All seems kind of dubious. No mention of overall differences between patients and controls, and has to use machine learning to come up with something. I mean, the brain is almost certainly involved, and it's plausible, but this just seems like junk science (correct me if I'm wrong about that).
Reposted by ME/CFS research
mecfsskeptic.bsky.social
1) We’ve written an article about the DecodeME results: what the study measured, what the results show, and why its findings are important.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
It's good that they reduce stress, but there is no evidence for those supplements or medications.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
Chronic stress can result in ANS dysregulation and ME/CFS. For many patients, reducing that stress can help, and quite often leads to improvement or recovery. That should never involve self-gaslighting or pushing through. Stress reduction is always safe, and never harmful, if done sensibly.
Reposted by ME/CFS research
cfsresearch.bsky.social
Most of the information in the article is incorrect. The ELISA test is only inaccurate for early lyme. For late lyme it's 100% accurate. The clinic seems to use a lot of unproven, unscientific tests and treatments.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
I suspect the PACE trial is to blame for this theory. I was ill long before it.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
Sorry to hear that. I visited many doctors and didn't encounter any that subscribed to this model. Admittedly none were very helpful, although they did mention stress as a factor (which eventually got me on the right track).
Reposted by ME/CFS research
lymediseaseaction.org.uk
It doesn't help, does it. Really sorry for the girl and her family. We have a Reality Check page which mentions that T-spot tests have been shown not to be useful. www.lymediseaseaction.org.uk/about-lyme/r... NB some late Lyme cases can test -ve if immunosuppression, or early inadequate treatment.
cfsresearch.bsky.social
Most of the information in the article is incorrect. The ELISA test is only inaccurate for early lyme. For late lyme it's 100% accurate. The clinic seems to use a lot of unproven, unscientific tests and treatments.