A butler of dogs
@butlerofdogs.bsky.social
1.6K followers 1.8K following 4.1K posts
Agnotologist. Epicurean. Politics. Gadgets. Coffee. Food. Science. Energy. Climate. Veganism. You can't do your own research. 🇵🇷 🇺🇸 🌏 🌱 🦔 ⚛️
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by A butler of dogs
rincewind.run
I think two things are true:

1. young republicans were always terrible and racist

2. young republicans become openly hitler-loving groypers is in fact a new and alarming development that is worth paying attention to
Reposted by A butler of dogs
sethcotlar.bsky.social
Journalists spent months documenting Stephen Miller's affinities for white nationalism and Trump just goes and tweets it out.
acyn.bsky.social
Trump: I want to thank Stephen Miller I would love to have him come up and explain his true feelings. Maybe not his truest feelings. That might be going a little too far
Reposted by A butler of dogs
walkerbragman.bsky.social
Billionaires decided long ago they’d rather have low taxes than democracy.
butlerofdogs.bsky.social
If only there had been opinion pieces about this before the election...
nytimes.com
If the Supreme Court strikes down Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which has been interpreted to require the creation of majority-minority districts, Republicans could eliminate upward of a dozen Democratic-held districts across the South. Here's how.
The Supreme Court Case That Could Hand the House to Republicans
Democrats would be in danger of losing around a dozen majority-minority districts across the South if the court struck down part of the Voting Rights Act.
nyti.ms
Reposted by A butler of dogs
walkerbragman.bsky.social
That would really be the end of majoritarian democracy in the United States.

It would represent the effective death of the republic. Horrifying to think they would leave people no political recourse to address their concerns or be heard.

Truly frightening place we’re headed in America.
nytimes.com
If the Supreme Court strikes down Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which has been interpreted to require the creation of majority-minority districts, Republicans could eliminate upward of a dozen Democratic-held districts across the South. Here's how.
The Supreme Court Case That Could Hand the House to Republicans
Democrats would be in danger of losing around a dozen majority-minority districts across the South if the court struck down part of the Voting Rights Act.
nyti.ms
Reposted by A butler of dogs
normative.bsky.social
There is no conceivable argument that these ships, even if we assume they were carrying narcotics, could not be dealt with in some other way. I think we can just drop the caveats and say: This is mass murder.
chrislhayes.bsky.social
Unless and until some kind of compelling legal and moral argument is presented as to why this is a legitimate use of deadly force, this is just…mass murder.
amaramarasingam.bsky.social
The military has now killed 27 people as if they were enemy soldiers in a war zone and not criminal suspects. www.nytimes.com/2025/10/14/u...
Reposted by A butler of dogs
unraveledpress.com
This is real. Chicago today.
donmoyn.bsky.social
Yeah, that is a tear gas canister being fired toward the retreating couple holding the baby
Reposted by A butler of dogs
acyn.bsky.social
AZ AG Mayes: If I have to, I’ll take Speaker Johnson to court. There's no legitimate reason for him to refuse to swear her in right now. And it's not fair for Mike Johnson to be holding the state of Arizona hostage because he doesn't want to release the Epstein files.
Reposted by A butler of dogs
esqueer.net
This is what Matt Walsh is defending.
Alt text:

Screenshot of two posts from the same verified social media account with a bearded man as the profile photo.
Top post: The account says that if someone who is conservative has a problem with another person on the political right, they should address it privately. Publicly attacking people on the same side is described as a weak move. Engagement stats show hundreds of replies and shares, and over 13,000 likes.
Bottom post: The account complains that people on the political right do not support each other and often criticize or abandon their allies, especially compared to people on the political left who are described as sticking together. The writer says they previously called for unity after someone named Charlie died but received rejection. They sarcastically conclude that continuing to divide will lead to losing. Engagement stats again show over a thousand replies and shares, and more than 11,000 likes.
Reposted by A butler of dogs
Reposted by A butler of dogs
Reposted by A butler of dogs
gtconway.bsky.social
That's twenty-seven flat-out murders. That's twenty-seven lives taken without even a semblance of a legal justification under domestic or international law.
www.nytimes.com/2025/10/14/u...
Reposted by A butler of dogs
greatdismal.bsky.social
Bought the new Pynchon in hardcover today, at our local indie bookseller, fulfilling two promises to self. Read the first few pages while waiting for our lunch sandwiches to be toasted in a nearby patisserie, immediately getting that in-for-a-good-read feeling.
Reposted by A butler of dogs
volts.wtf
Look at this incredible work by our dogsitter.