Ghastreblyansky
@yastreblyansky.bsky.social
2.6K followers 1.9K following 13K posts
There is no peace without justice. Old Democratic blogger at yastreblyansky.blogspot.com and yastreblyansky.substack.com. He/him. Is this where the party is?
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
yastreblyansky.bsky.social
It's "always nice" to have a recommendation from government officials means (a) he's lying, there's no such recommendation at least yet and (b) he's claiming also falsely that he doesn't need one. Hope that's clear.
yastreblyansky.bsky.social
Nothing like the horror of a naked bike ride.
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
bartenderhemry.bsky.social
This is exactly backwards, the no kings protests are a mass movement of regular people that have every republican politician in the country raging about "hate America rallies," and the online protest industry weirdos who say shit like "radlib" to each other are the ones skimming off the top of them
it is no wonder that 50501, a movement of radlibs who are very upset but don’t want to get in trouble, would be boosting superficial activism.

superficial activism has its place, but if that place is front and center, it kills whatever movement it is skimming off the top of.
yastreblyansky.bsky.social
His own parts, he couldn't stop fapping. He had to get in touch with his son by Covenant Eyes.
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
jonathanbernstein.bsky.social
What do I know and I'm not saying it's a magic bullet or anything like that but it sure seems to me that Dems should run hard on the Argentina bailout. Not anywhere near the worst thing Trump has done, but i suspect it's unusually clarifying.
atrupar.com
Jeffries: "It's perplexing to us that Rs refuse to spend a dime to protect the healthcare of the American people, but somehow the Trump admin found $40b to bail out a right-wing wannabe dictator in Argentina in ways that are also going to continue to hurt our soybean farmers in Iowa & the Midwest"
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
The official government account for DHS appears to be run by far-right trolls deliberately trying to provoke a response by using a term openly associated with ethnic cleansing. They will attack anyone who points this out and express faux outrage at the suggestion. They know what they are doing.
Remigration Wikipedia Page.


Not to be confused with Return migration.
Remigration is an originally European far-right proposal of ethnic cleansing via the mass deportation of non-white immigrants and their descendants, sometimes including those born in Europe, to their place of racial ancestry.
It is popular especially within the Identitarian movement. Some proponents of remigration suggest excluding some persons with non-European background from such a mass deportation, based on a varyingly defined degree of assimilation into European culture.
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
susurros.bsky.social
"Many of the 90 bodies of Palestinians returned to Gaza by Israeli authorities under the ceasefire deal showed signs of torture and execution, including blindfolds, cuffed hands and bullet wounds in the head, according to doctors’ accounts."

www.theguardian.com/world/2025/o...
Palestinian bodies returned by Israel show signs of torture and execution, say doctors
Almost all had been blindfolded and had gunshot wounds between the eyes, says medic at Nasser hospital in Gaza
www.theguardian.com
yastreblyansky.bsky.social
Maybe when he does the "bless her heart" bit you should look him in the eye and say, "Do you know who my father was?" Sounds a little Karen but I bet Johnson is sensitive to that. Main thing is you really do know more about the House than he will ever know, not just by birth but because he's stupid.
yastreblyansky.bsky.social
really bad at that but I know you're right, thanks for the reminder.
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
melbuer.bsky.social
I see protest discourse is hitting the feed again ahead of No Kings—idk man, go, don’t go,

…but if you do go make sure to link up with an org that’ll help you get into longterm organizing and if you don’t go, make sure to link up with an org that’ll help you get into longterm organizing
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
yastreblyansky.bsky.social
Calling Vice President Vance--you've got another foolish little boy to defend
dannied.bsky.social
Nick Fuentes just got kicked off Spotify—his “America First” podcast can’t even compete with basic decency. Platforms finally saying: nope, hate speech stays off the charts. 💀🎧
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
cajunblue.bsky.social
“Don’t give them your fear.” The No Kings protest matters. Do what you can, when you can to resist the fascist takeover we are watching in real time. No fear to PAB’s! None!
yastreblyansky.bsky.social
Emperor Trump signs imperial rescript informing public that his new clothes are TOTALLY visible and anybody expressing doubt on that is subject to arrest and deportation.

It only works if people allow it to work. Trump's executive orders don't change anything unless people accept them.
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
That absolutely isn’t how it works.

- me to Trump … and the NYT
nytimes.com
President Trump on Wednesday signed a memorandum expanding his administration’s authority to repurpose unspent federal funds to pay members of the military during the government shutdown, escalating his challenge to the authority of Congress on spending matters.
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
meidastouch.com
Governor Newsom has issued a response on social media:
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
johnpfaff.bsky.social
Fordham Law Professor signs memorandum declaring the Buffalo Bills winners of Super Bowl LX, escalating his challenge to the authority of the NFL* on football matters.
nytimes.com
President Trump on Wednesday signed a memorandum expanding his administration’s authority to repurpose unspent federal funds to pay members of the military during the government shutdown, escalating his challenge to the authority of Congress on spending matters.
Trump Signs Memo Expanding His Authority to Spend Federal Money
The president gave Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wide authority to repurpose funds to pay members of the military without approval from Congress, which has the sole constitutional authority to decide federal spending.
nyti.ms
yastreblyansky.bsky.social
Oldest dictator trick in the world, from Julius Caesar to Napoleon Bonaparte
donmoyn.bsky.social
See this for what it is:
*Trump wants to make the military/FBI loyal to him
*GOP refuses bipartisan legislation to pay the military
*Trump creates a new executive power: that he and he alone decides if the military/FBI is paid during shutdown

donmoynihan.substack.com/p/the-shutdo...
This bothers me, and I think it should bother you. At a time when the President is politicizing the military, it strikes me as a deeply troubling development that their paychecks depend upon his willingness to dig into the treasury, as opposed to it being a bipartisan matter of law. Such a dependence is exactly the opposite of what we want to see in a regime built around the logic of personalist loyalty.
yastreblyansky.bsky.social
"no longer protecting consumers"--Does he see CFPB the way Kavanaugh sees the Voting Rights Act, like it already fixed everything and consumers don't have any problems any more?
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
Reposted by Ghastreblyansky
donmoyn.bsky.social
Some RIFs will kill legislation, e.g the Ed office that oversees disability. IDEA was passed 50 yrs ago, when there was broad bipartisan agreement that a more inclusive educational system was a good thing.
It was repealed last Friday. No law was passed. Trump simply made IDEA a dead letter.
If you have had any interaction with education at the state and local level, you will know there are strong incentives for school systems to shortchange students with disabilities by skirting the IDEA mandates. That is why the law exists. Without a federal cop on the beat, states will know that it will be safer for them to ignore it. People at state governments see it this way also. One state director of special education told NPR:

I’m fearful. I think it’s good for states to know there’s federal oversight and that they’ll be held accountable. The concept of leaving special education up to states sounds great, but it’s scary. What happens if one state decides to interpret the law one way, but another state disagrees and interprets it differently?