unraveled5.bsky.social
@unraveled5.bsky.social
540 followers
59 following
1.3K posts
“This should be shocking not only to judges, but to the intuitive sense of liberty that Americans far removed from courthouses still hold dear."
Posts
Media
Videos
Starter Packs
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Comer: The evidence we gathered does not implicate President Trump in any way. Public reporting, survivor testimony, and official documents show that Bill Clinton had far closer ties to Epstein
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
The NYT is reporting that Donald Trump is demanding $230 Million from the DOJ for past cases against him.
That means...he's suing us. Because that's who would pay for it.
That means...he's suing us. Because that's who would pay for it.
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
ElieNYC
@elienyc.bsky.social
· 11h
By a vote of 66-32, the #Senate invoked cloture on the nomination of Harold D. Mooty III to be US District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama.
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
the symbolism of “Trump destroying the White House for a overpriced luxury vanity project, during a government shut down, days after a historically-large mass demonstration against his regime called “No Kings”’ would be rightly viewed as laying it on a little thick if it was in a work of fiction
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Trump in July, on the WH $250MM ballroom project:
“It won’t interfere with the current building.... It’ll be near it but not touching it — and pays total respect to the existing building, which I’m the biggest fan of."
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
“It won’t interfere with the current building.... It’ll be near it but not touching it — and pays total respect to the existing building, which I’m the biggest fan of."
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
This is very very very very, very very little work for people who make more than $100,000 and have staffs of more than three people.
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social
Reposted by unraveled5.bsky.social