Nat Marshall
banner
natsleep.bsky.social
Nat Marshall
@natsleep.bsky.social
220 followers 250 following 37 posts
Sleep epidemiologist and clinical triallist at the Woolcock Institute and Professor at Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. Editor at SLEEP and J Sleep Res. #SleepPeeps Clinical Researcher Development. Hurkle-durkler. Statistical grief counselor
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I used to have children who did that
Definately my weirdest scientific idea yet: Can humans sleep one half of their brains at a time when they sleep in water, like dolphins do? Certainly no proof of that yet - but we have a method to maybe catch it. And, Yes, a human can fall asleep floating in a fluid. lnkd.in/gUHSRjug
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
Reposted by Nat Marshall
Venn (1866) described the problem with the "sharpshooter fallacy": 🎯 painting the bullseye on the spot where a bullet hits a door.
In psychology, we call this "HARKing" — Hypothesizing After Results Are Known.
We're going to need a bigger boat
Are you assuming your audience is highly educated in the right way?
Reposted by Nat Marshall
NEJM.org @nejm.org · May 14
In the TAK-861-2001 trial involving 112 participants with narcolepsy type 1, oveporexton significantly improved measures of wakefulness, sleepiness, and cataplexy over a period of 8 weeks. Full trial results: nej.md/3ZdlKNi

#MedSky #NeuroSky
Facepalm
I'm not sure we needed a statistical test here folks.
Reposted by Nat Marshall
There you have it: BEDMED published in @jama.com

jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...

h/t @drjmluther.bsky.social

No difference in bedtime versus morning BP meds - as expected

#NephSky #Hypertension
1/
Reposted by Nat Marshall
JAMA @jama.com · Apr 14
Authors, editors, reviewers, and other potential users should use CONSORT 2025 when writing and evaluating manuscripts of randomized trials to ensure that trial reports are clear and transparent.

Learn more in this Special Communication. https://ja.ma/3Yyu0Hh
Hardly anybody has been trained to read the methods section
Reposted by Nat Marshall
The BMJ @bmj.com · Mar 25
Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials has become an essential step in the systematic review process.

A new tool allows users to assess risk of bias of RCTs included in systematic reviews in a user friendly way
www.bmj.com/content/388/...
What role for wakefulness promotors? How well do they really work and what are the side-effects? Julia Chapman and I's latest editorial discussing the latest trial evidence authors.elsevier.com/c/1kkb52p-lG...
authors.elsevier.com
Because you don't need a license or any training to publish 'epidemiology'?
Not historic enough. Need to upgrade to the Antonine Plague or cholera reactivated from handling John Snow's lab equipment.
Interventions for gut flora to improve health?
And of course one by Senn too...
It seems to have learned German since your trip