Daniel Lakens
@lakens.bsky.social
5.3K followers 1.2K following 2.3K posts
Metascience, statistics, psychology, philosophy of science. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands. Omnia probate. 🇪🇺
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
lakens.bsky.social
My paper on concerns about replicability, theorizing, relevance, generalizability, and methodology across 2 crises is now in press at the International Review of Social Psychology. After revisions it was 17500 words, so it is split in 2 parts: osf.io/dtvs7_v2 and osf.io/g6kja_v1
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Daniel Lakens
debruine.bsky.social
Please help us, #MetaScience community!

It's time to decide on a forever name for papercheck (scienceverse.github.io/papercheck/). We don't want it to be confused with papercheck.ai, and we plan to check other research artifacts like repo contents, data, code, and prereg. Any suggestions?
Check Scientific Papers for Best Practices
A modular, extendable system for automatically checking scientific papers for best practices using text search, R code, and/or (optional) LLM queries.
scienceverse.github.io
Reposted by Daniel Lakens
lakens.bsky.social
Spend years studying something so that you are smarter about it than 99% of the other people in your space, and write things useful for others for a few years typically gets you in a good starting position, in my personal experience.
lakens.bsky.social
Yes, I typically never interact with anonymous accounts on platforms like this. Waste of time, and people who chose to be anonymous end up never sharing my values.
lakens.bsky.social
As we ended, we need a philosopher to help us out :) I think it is an edge case, but for me, it is just over the edge and more like faking data - albeit just a summary statistic - and not inflating the error rate of the actual p-values. Yeah, I guess I think I was really right 😅
lakens.bsky.social
It is interesting how LinkedIn has become the academic networking site. After giving a talk in a new community, you used to get new followers in places like this. But now, you only get new connection requests on LinkedIn. Different times!
lakens.bsky.social
I am listening to the edited version (which Smriti did) and we do not mention your name. Apologies!
lakens.bsky.social
Did I need to by a golden vinyl single of 'Golden' by Huntrix?

No.

Did I buy it anyway?

Yes, yes I did.
lakens.bsky.social
Tomorrow I will be in Nijmegen to talk at the VVSOR meeting on when and why we make dichotomous claims based on statistical tests at a meeting about philosophy in statistics education. www.vvsor.nl/education/ev...

I always a joy explaining why p<.05 is such an important tool.
Thinking in Grey – Statistical Philosophy in Statistics Education - VVSOR
Join us at the next meeting of the Section Statistics Education, please mark your calendar
www.vvsor.nl
lakens.bsky.social
Tomorrow I will be in Nijmegen to talk at the VVSOR meeting on when and why we make dichotomous claims based on statistical tests at a meeting about philosophy in statistics education. www.vvsor.nl/education/ev...

I always a joy explaining why p<.05 is such an important tool.
Thinking in Grey – Statistical Philosophy in Statistics Education - VVSOR
Join us at the next meeting of the Section Statistics Education, please mark your calendar
www.vvsor.nl
Reposted by Daniel Lakens
psicostat.bsky.social
🚀 Kicking off the upcoming month with a fresh round of online talks! First up: Alessio Farcomeni
🎙 Join us next Friday, October 10 at 13pm (CEST), for "A brief introduction to quantile regression". Don’t miss it! 🔍📊
lakens.bsky.social
Only one of these two is what you are paid for by the tax payer, so that should be relatively simple 😏
Reposted by Daniel Lakens
lakens.bsky.social
It was so very nice to show you around! Thanks for coming to Rotterdam!
Reposted by Daniel Lakens
bwroberts.bsky.social
I went to Rotterdam for a reproducibility therapy session with @lakens.bsky.social. I am happy to report that the patient is doing much better—maybe due to a placebo effect. Who knows.
Daniel and Brent in Rotterdam
lakens.bsky.social
Doing the right thing, just because it is the right thing is underappreciated by academics.
lakens.bsky.social
People sometimes say they do not have time to do open science. But they can use the time they would have needed 40 years ago to send and request paper copies of articles to read the literature.

Somehow we never acknowledge where we gained time that we can invest in open science.
lakens.bsky.social
People kept buying incandescent light bulbs, even though LED lights were better for the environment and cheaper in the long run. But incandescent light were cheap in the short term. In the end, the EU had to ban incandescent lights.

The adoption of Open Science works same.
Reposted by Daniel Lakens
jdmiller.bsky.social
I love the idea that we’ll see change in clinical psych re: open science adoption when the messaging tone changes. lol.