Kevin Zollman
@kevinzollman.com
7.6K followers 1.7K following 5.4K posts
Philosophy and Game Theory at Carnegie Mellon 🦚 Research the interface between philosophy, economics, and biology 💱 www.kevinzollman.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
kevinzollman.com
I did the thing you are never supposed to do. I wrote a (rough draft of a) textbook: Theories of Rational Decision

It's technical, but from a philosophical perspective. It focuses on the normative theory but touches on some behavioral issues as well.

raw.githubusercontent.com/kzollman/Rat...
raw.githubusercontent.com
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
dragoman.bsky.social
"God is a somewhat powerful being who is nevertheless endangered by beer brand endorsements" is Evangelical "theology" summed up pretty well
atrupar.com
Eric Trump: "We're saving Christianity. We've saving God. We've saving the family unit. We're saving this nation. I mean, DEI is out of the window, Benny. You no longer have Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem. You no longer have Budweiser going woke as hell. All of this is dead."
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
lastpositivist.bsky.social
For God's sake we all know postdocs aren't real, stop trying to scare PhD students with superstitious nonsense.
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
irhottakes.bsky.social
Also, people gotta make up their minds about white people and food because they’re always like “your food is unexotic and bland and also how dare you ever try anything from anywhere else.” Give us an out here.
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
noamchompers.bsky.social
tfw you're taking elizabeth anderson's egalitarianism class
kevinzollman.com
Hiked up to a waterfall in New River Gorge National Park. But there was no water.

Thanks, #TrumpShutdown
kevinzollman.com
If it has to be a book, I think I'd say Paradoxes A to Z. I don't love the paradox focused way of doing philosophy, but it is a good way to get a bite sized introduction to a lot of it.
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
kjhealy.co
It’s great to be paid for protesting and everything but let me tell you the whole antifa reimbursement process is just terrible
kevinzollman.com
I've never gone back and read it again. But for an angsty, drug addled, 17 year old Kevin, it was perfect.
kevinzollman.com
Does it have to be a book? These days I just recommend The Good Place and Star Trek
kevinzollman.com
This is what got me interested in philosophy
kevinzollman.com
Isn't funding replication exactly that?
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
cmu-neuroscience.bsky.social
Come along with CMU Professor Timothy Verstynen for a playful dive into the “neuroscience of zombies,” where movie monsters meet real brain science. Along the way you’ll learn some surprising truths about how our own minds and bodies work.
Wednesday, October 29, Noon ET On Zoom
tinyurl.com/4e5pn3xa
kevinzollman.com
p-hacking isn't methodologically sound, but multiple studies looking for one kind of association is pretty much the norm.
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
danhicks.bsky.social
The "gold standard science" stuff plays on the same oversimplified picture of science, and that's part of the reason scientists have had such weak-ass responses to it
kevinzollman.com
It's not that I think RFK is going to do good science on this topic. I think it's important to criticize it for the right reasons.

I think perpetuating the children's version of the scientific method leads to scientific skepticism.
kevinzollman.com
It's not that I think RFK is going to do good science on this topic. I think it's important to criticize it for the right reasons.

I think perpetuating the children's version of the scientific method leads to scientific skepticism.
kevinzollman.com
Even more reflective ones will often have a very narrow view of science. They presume that all science works like their narrow subfield. They define "the scientific method" in a way that makes most science "not science."
kevinzollman.com
A reoccurring frustration for philosophers of science: Many scientists know how to do science like people know how to ride a bike. When they reflect on the practice of science, they repeat platitudes about how science works. Those platitudes are often wrong, sometimes even about their own field
danhicks.bsky.social
*sighs in philosopher of science*

Looking for confirmatory evidence is an entirely normal part of science. The primary problem here is the eugenics and the fascism, not the lies to children about "the scientific method."
One Bluesky account is quoting another. Inner post has a video of RFK Jr., some person I don't recognize (Tylenol and autism guy, maybe?), Marco Rubio (I think), and Trump. Post text: "RFK Jr on Tylenol and autism: 'It is not proof. We're doing the studies to make the proof." 

Outer post text: "We're doing studies to prove it (* not how studies work)"
Reposted by Kevin Zollman
danhicks.bsky.social
*sighs in philosopher of science*

Looking for confirmatory evidence is an entirely normal part of science. The primary problem here is the eugenics and the fascism, not the lies to children about "the scientific method."
One Bluesky account is quoting another. Inner post has a video of RFK Jr., some person I don't recognize (Tylenol and autism guy, maybe?), Marco Rubio (I think), and Trump. Post text: "RFK Jr on Tylenol and autism: 'It is not proof. We're doing the studies to make the proof." 

Outer post text: "We're doing studies to prove it (* not how studies work)"
kevinzollman.com
I'm glad to see that blue sky moderation has realized that people need to be protected from K*nt
kevinzollman.com
They also get their own signs
A picture of a blue sign that says "wombat poo" in front of a lake and a tree
kevinzollman.com
It's uncontroversial to say, "I would have been better off if I hadn't stubbed my toe." So, we feel like any question of the form "would so-and-so have been better off if such-and-such hadn't happened." But I think sometimes those questions are just meaningless.
kevinzollman.com
It's difficult to think about whether someone would have been better off in radically different circumstances. Would someone who is now autistic have been better off if they weren't? Is it even sensible to talk about them being the same person? These questions don't always have clear answers
theferocity.bsky.social
I don’t exactly how to phrase this, but like… is autism that bad???? Like, why is it such a source of fear??? Of course there are challenges but you can be autistic and have a rich, fulfilling life! Many people do! I don’t understand the preoccupation.
Reposted by Kevin Zollman