elisa freschi
banner
elisafreschi.bsky.social
elisa freschi
@elisafreschi.bsky.social

Sanskrit (and) philosophy. Permanently in beta phase. Blogging at http://elisafreschi.com and http://indianphilosophyblog.org. Articles at PhilPapers Here to learn & share

Philosophy 47%
History 21%

If you, like me, struggle with the idea of a strong claim, consider that this can also be something like "Utpaladeva's contribution to the philosophy of love is unmissable bc he's the first to claim that love does not need to be among two different individuals. I will show it w these passages…".
19

Instead, extract your notes and make them into a separate paper on the text you edited or translated. Try to have a strong claim as the centre of the WS.
18/

Concerning your writing-sample: It needs to be as good as possible, especially for UofT_Philosophy (since the research proposal is not an issue there). For EU and Japanese students (and others around the world): An annotated critical edition or translation does not count as a writing sample.
17/

This might be relevant while planning conferences.

Sure, let's just use gen-AI in health and research!
"Runctitiononal features"? "Medical fymblal"? "1 Tol Line storee"? This gets worse the longer you look at it. But it's got to be good, because it was published in Nature Scientific Reports last week: www.nature.com/articles/s41... h/t @asa.tsbalans.se
University of Helsinki is hiring:
Postdoctoral Researcher in History of Ethics
I feel much safer today knowing that we deported a Babson College student back to a country where she hasn't lived since childhood.

She wasn't even flying internationally. She was flying to Texas.
A Babson College student wanted to surprise her family for Thanksgiving. She was deported instead. - The Boston Globe
Any Lucia Lopez Belloza was at Logan to catch a flight to Texas when immigration authorities detained her as she was about to board the plane.
www.bostonglobe.com
"Runctitiononal features"? "Medical fymblal"? "1 Tol Line storee"? This gets worse the longer you look at it. But it's got to be good, because it was published in Nature Scientific Reports last week: www.nature.com/articles/s41... h/t @asa.tsbalans.se

Interesting to think about in connection with (pseudo?) sentences like "Colourless green ideas sleep furiously", whose meaning can hardly he exported…
#PhilosophyOfLanguage #philosophy

Volume I of the Journal for New Narratives in the History of Philosophy is now published.

#philsky

journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/nn...
Journal for New Narratives in the History of Philosophy
journal.lib.uoguelph.ca

with signature locks in St John…

Happy World Linguistics Day with Saussure's reflections on #apoha!
Happy World Linguistics Day 🎉

Not Saussure how to celebrate? Episodes 12 and 13 of our podcast will give your plans some structure...

🎙️ hiphilangsci.net/2021/02/01/p...

🎙️ hiphilangsci.net/2021/03/01/p...

#LinguisticBirthdays #LinguisticQuotes #Histlx #WorldLinguisticsDay

At the Department of Equity, Ethics, and Policy and Department of Philosophy #PhilosophyJobs

Reposted by Elisa Freschi

Reposted by Elisa Freschi

"We train ChatGPT to recognise and respond to signs of mental or emotional distress, de-escalate conversations, and guide people toward real-world support.”

Anyone who has read the transcripts (heartbreaking!) knows this simply wasn't the case. ChatGPT kept up with its messages of 'empowerment.'

Reposted by Elisa Freschi

Amazing in every way: Altarpiece of St. Vincent Ferrer, church of SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Venice. 1464. Paintings by Giovanni Bellini, whose day is today. Enframement also more than A+!

Or that repeating old arguments w/o even knowing it is a waste of everyone's time and that history of philosophy is at the very least a powerful training, without which no one can excel in philosophy.
(Honest Q, in case it was not obvious).
2/

I don't disagree, but do you think that logic is important or that it is MORE important than, say, epistemology or history of philosophy? I can imagine powerful arguments about the fact that unless you have investigated the ways you know, you can't know for sure.
1/

Same problem when someone speaks of "Vedic philosophy" without any differentiation and goes on claiming things about the ātman that are just what (most) Advaita Vedānta authors think. As philosophers, we should seek complexity not easy ways out.
5/

I am surprised by Taylor's translation of paśu as `wild animals', since I would understand the couple paśu-mṛga as domesticated vs. wild mammals (usually quadrupeds and herbivores)
What does it mean to understand language? We argue that the brain’s core language system is limited, and that *deeply* understanding language requires EXPORTING info to other brain regions.
w/ @neuranna.bsky.social @evfedorenko.bsky.social @nancykanwisher.bsky.social
arxiv.org/abs/2511.19757
1/n🧵👇
What does it mean to understand language?
Language understanding entails not just extracting the surface-level meaning of the linguistic input, but constructing rich mental models of the situation it describes. Here we propose that because pr...
arxiv.org
Happy World Linguistics Day 🎉

Not Saussure how to celebrate? Episodes 12 and 13 of our podcast will give your plans some structure...

🎙️ hiphilangsci.net/2021/02/01/p...

🎙️ hiphilangsci.net/2021/03/01/p...

#LinguisticBirthdays #LinguisticQuotes #Histlx #WorldLinguisticsDay
can’t fucking catch a breath

make it stop

For me, numbers tell me nothing (I have no way to know whether it's true and it costs you nothing to say it, since I do not have access to the letters you wrote for each other candidate in the last 20ys!).
Thoughts?
2/2

From a guidebook about #RecommendationLetters for law school: " "I recommend Jane with enthusiasm" tells us nothing. But, "in my twenty years here, I would place Jane in the top 3%" shines like a neon sign.”"

This is so much AGAINST my own experience with letters!
1/
"Unlike continental nonsense, analytic philosophy is clear and intelligible"

the changes in the light are really fascinating.

This is the kind of review that would cost me an enormous amount of time just correcting stupid mistakes, & I would end up feeling angry at myself for accepting it. I would still want to help a jr colleague or a recent post Doc, but it seems to me that a sr colleague should have higher standards
2/2