Scholar
LightNews

Stephanie Eckman

Videos
H-index: 17
Mathematics 24%
Sociology 20%
more

Reposted by Stephanie Eckman, David Rothschild

janetlauyeung.bsky.social
are you attending @colmweb.org 🦙 psst, don't miss our First Workshop on Bridging NLP and Public Opinion Research tomorrow #COLM2025

🛎️ we have a great line up of keynotes, presentation, and panel discussion, followed by a happy hour

📍 room 518B

schedule and info: sites.google.com/view/nlpor20...
NLPOR workshop at COLM ChatGPT generated image for the happy hour event after the workshop
1 5 11

by Stephanie Eckman

I know the pro version of Claude will let me load up papers, that’s the next approach I’ll take
1

by Stephanie Eckman

I tried similar prompts with the Assistant in SCite, but it gave errors and didn’t produce anything. I think it does better with shorter prompts (“find references to support / disagree with this statement”)

(@scite.bsky.social exists, but I can't tag it)
1

by Stephanie Eckman

When I finally got it to make citations in the style I wanted, many of them were incorrect (which is wild, when there are only 40 or so papers loaded).

In the end, it didn’t save me any time at all
1

by Stephanie Eckman

It writes OK lit review text, but I can’t get it to make usable citations. It makes those little numbers I can hover over, but it’s a ton of manual work to turn those into \cite{xyz} commands.

A lot of complaints about similar issues online: www.reddit.com/r/notebooklm...
From the notebooklm community on Reddit
Explore this post and more from the notebooklm community
www.reddit.com
1

by Stephanie Eckman

Looking for tips on how to use the new AI tools to help with a literature review.

I was so excited about NotebookLM, but my frustration is growing. I uploaded the papers (~40) I want it to draw from, and then spent several hours trying to get it to draft a reasonable lit review *with citations*
1 3

by Stephanie Eckman

@statstas.bsky.social — your point about totals rather than percents
wileymacgyver.bsky.social
Gurney Halleck and his 9-foot Balliset @wileymacgyver.bsky.social · Nov 7
The actual number of votes that Trump got is less than he lost with in 2020. This was an absolute failure of Democrats to turn out the vote. I don't think any of these places actually became more Republican
1 2

Reposted by Stephanie Eckman

wileymacgyver.bsky.social
The actual number of votes that Trump got is less than he lost with in 2020. This was an absolute failure of Democrats to turn out the vote. I don't think any of these places actually became more Republican
9 22 160

by Stephanie Eckman

It’s really funny, though not a comedy
1

by Stephanie Eckman

Here’s a paper doing imputation. I read and earlier version, not the latest, and was frustrated that they didn’t compare their ML imputation method to other more traditional imputation approaches.

arxiv.org/pdf/2305.096...
2 1

by Stephanie Eckman

This is the closest I’ve found:

arxiv.org/abs/2401.08572
1 3

by Stephanie Eckman

How do you make a scientific case about a method’s usefulness without a proper lit review?
2 1

by Stephanie Eckman

by synthetic samples, I mean using LLMs to generate survey responses

"imagine you are a 54 year old African American man. Please answer the following survey question..."
1 1

by Stephanie Eckman

Can anyone point me to a paper, WP, blog post that reviews the literature on synthetic samples? Thank you
1 2 4

Reposted by Stephanie Eckman

kwcollins.bsky.social
Has anyone used DC’s school lottery as an instrument to evaluate effect of pre-k on subsequent educational achievement ?
1 1

by Stephanie Eckman

IMO, the worst problem with data analysis a in Excel is how hard it is to trace back where a result came from. Yes, there are now trace dependence and trace precedence buttons, but it still is not nearly as clear as it would be in a script file
1 1 3

by Florian Keusch — Reposted by Stephanie Eckman

floriankeusch.bsky.social
Took us a while, but we finally put another chapter of our book "Data Collection with #Wearables, #Apps, and #Sensors" online. Chapter 4: Errors of Nonobservation: #Sampling and #Coverage. bookdown.org/wasbook_feed... Let us know what you think! @stephnie.bsky.social
Chapter 4 Errors of nonobservation: Sampling and coverage | Data Collection with Wearables, Apps, and Sensors
Chapter 4 Errors of nonobservation: Sampling and coverage | Data Collection with Wearables, Apps, and Sensors
bookdown.org
1 6 11

by Stephanie Eckman

They really are : “the importance…in some vague sense” IIRC

by Stephanie Eckman

I show students the definitions of the 4 types of weights, to try to prevent them from using aw= (because that’s what the command accepts) when they have pweights. I doubt I’m successful

Reposted by Stephanie Eckman

jssam.bsky.social
In case you missed it! "Interviewer Involvement in Respondent Selection Moderates the Relationship between Response Rates and Sample Bias in Cross-National Survey Projects in Europe" by Marta Kołczyńska, Piotr Jabkowski & Stephanie Eckman @stephnie.bsky.social doi.org/10.1093/jssa...
2 2

by Stephanie Eckman

@aapor.bsky.social @floriankeusch.bsky.social @daob.nl
bradjones.bsky.social
Brad Jones @bradjones.bsky.social · Feb 26
Survey researchers of Blue Sky, this is a new initiative of mine, and right now the queue is wide open meaning any new submissions have a high likelihood of acceptance: docs.google.com/document/d/1...

#polisci #polisky
Call for proposals
docs.google.com
2

Reposted by Stephanie Eckman, Scott Clifford, Martin Bækgaard , and 1 more

bradjones.bsky.social
Survey researchers of Blue Sky, this is a new initiative of mine, and right now the queue is wide open meaning any new submissions have a high likelihood of acceptance: docs.google.com/document/d/1...

#polisci #polisky
Call for proposals
docs.google.com
2 23 26

by Stephanie Eckman

Fantastic thread on data quality issues with inattentive respondents.We can’t weight our way out of these problems if the demographics are provide are wrong
kwcollins.bsky.social
Kevin Collins @kwcollins.bsky.social · Feb 23
To your points, yes, this is GESIS. The question was "recent research" and I certainly think "forthcoming at JSSAM" is responsive to that question. But it's not the only study to find that inattentive respondents differ in politically-relevant demographics

Reposted by Stephanie Eckman

kwcollins.bsky.social
To your points, yes, this is GESIS. The question was "recent research" and I certainly think "forthcoming at JSSAM" is responsive to that question. But it's not the only study to find that inattentive respondents differ in politically-relevant demographics
1

by Stephanie Eckman

Debatable — what do you mean by “very well”?
1

by Stephanie Eckman

Sort of — in R, PLmixed will give you similar results (discrimination, difficulty) to mirt. PLmixed fits “mixed models with factor structures”
2

by Stephanie Eckman

because they're economists 😉?
1

by Stephanie Eckman

Searching for the dates of the next AAPOR conference, I typed in "aapor.org conference." None of the top hits were helpful --previous years, archived site

I think we could use a little Search Engine Optimization, @aapor.bsky.social

In the meantime -- include 2024 in your search (or "79th" 🙄🤪)
search results for "aapor.org conference"
3

by Stephanie Eckman

Yes — some colleagues want to see an intercept slope version before they’ll trust the results
1

Reposted by Stephanie Eckman

jssam.bsky.social
New Article Alert! "Interviewer Involvement in Respondent Selection Moderates the Relationship between Response Rates and Sample Bias in Cross-National Survey Projects in Europe" by Marta Kołczyńska, Piotr Jabkowski & Stephanie Eckman @stephnie.bsky.social doi.org/10.1093/jssa...
3 3

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m