#SciSci
How FAIR is shared data in psychology?

We analyzed 11,384 datasets (2013–2024): They're findable, but less reusable!

What relates most to differences in FAIRness? #Repository choice.

👉 Preprint: doi.org/10.23668/psy...

@mariogollwitzer.bsky.social @kaisassenberg.bsky.social #metascience #SciSci
October 21, 2025 at 5:48 AM Everybody can reply
23 reposts 4 quotes 43 likes 10 saves
GOAL! 11' — G. Scisci scores for Argentino de Merlo. Argentino de Merlo 3–0 Liniers. Primera B Metropolitana
September 20, 2025 at 6:54 PM Everybody can reply
GOAL! 11' — G. Scisci scores for Argentino de Merlo. Argentino de Merlo 3–0 Liniers. Primera B Metropolitana
September 20, 2025 at 6:54 PM Everybody can reply
작년 SCISCI-KOREA의 두번째 워크숖인 “Science of Science Korea Workshop 2025”가 다가오는 2025년 9월 11일(목), 한국과학기술원(KAIST) 본원 학술문화관 양승택 오디토리움에서 가 개최됩니다.
August 30, 2025 at 6:11 AM Everybody can reply
***Limited Offer***

Who wants to be a "citation partner" and boost their citations?

#PredatoryPublishing #SciSci #Metascience #MetaSci
This RedNote post shocked me today.

An anonymous user says they are going to upload 60 papers to arXiv soon and are looking for “citation partners” to boost citation counts together by citing each other.

Something is seriously wrong in the system of evaluating researchers by citation counts.
August 25, 2025 at 11:02 PM Everybody can reply
1 reposts 5 likes
1/7🧵Ignoring race, gender & income doesn’t deliver fairness—it deepens inequity. 🚫
Policies that erase demographic data in admissions don’t level the field. They hide barriers and advantage those already holding resources. Check out the evidence below!
#EduSky #SciSci @aaascsew.bsky.social 🧪 🎓
August 25, 2025 at 1:40 PM Everybody can reply
8 reposts 19 likes
An important piece on #AI generated #preprints and why it's important to consider their impact on scientific ecosystem.

Some other important considerations related to this that are not covered in the article 👇

🧵1/14

#AI4Science #AI4Research #ScAISci #SciSci
August 13, 2025 at 9:44 PM Everybody can reply
12 reposts 1 quotes 18 likes
Alibi n. 3458:
A causa di un fraintendimento, colpevolmente causato da hacker dell'opposizione, i ministri Nordio e Piantedosi e il sottosegretario Mantovano erano persuasi che la Corte Penale Internazionale avesse chiesto l'arresto di tale Giovannicola Scisci da Savelletri (BR).
August 5, 2025 at 9:16 PM Everybody can reply
17 likes
August 2, 2025 at 3:59 PM Everybody can reply
4 likes
yes it is, but de facto true. just came back from #ic2s2 , one of the main forums for scisci, and I can confirm this is still the case. in putting together the @euroscisci.bsky.social , we've been aiming at a more inclusive definition of the science of science
August 2, 2025 at 6:16 AM Everybody can reply
@samulireijula.net defining scisci as based on large scale data set analysis seems inherantly quite limiting
August 2, 2025 at 5:52 AM Everybody can reply
1 likes
Metascience is important and scisci is very exciting but they’re certainly not the same thing! But maybe should be?
August 2, 2025 at 4:54 AM Everybody can reply
5 likes
F. Filippi, M. Cipriani, S. Mastrostefano, M. Scisci\`o, F. Consoli: Novel techniques of imaging interferometry analysis to study gas and plasma density for laser-plasma experiments https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13907 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.13907 https://arxiv.org/html/2507.13907
July 21, 2025 at 6:49 AM Everybody can reply
2 reposts
Thanks! Yeah, I thought about where to put SciSci strand (impressively represented by Prof. Dashun Wang at the conference) and decided to keep this map orthogonal to the "method" of description and stay on the intent of "intervention" as you say.
July 4, 2025 at 3:36 PM Everybody can reply
In that spirit, within #SciSci, critiques of navel-gazing may often target those studying people (e.g., retracted scientists, postdocs, students, academics) rather than processes (e.g., peer review, idea generation).

🧵 9/12
June 30, 2025 at 6:18 AM Everybody can reply
1 likes
On "navel-gazing" in science..

and why we should rethink how we use this term in research discourse.

🧵 1/12

#SciSci #MetaScience #MetaSci #ResearchOnResearch #RoR
June 30, 2025 at 6:18 AM Everybody can reply
2 reposts 5 likes
All new submissions to @nathumbehav.nature.com that are published will be accompanied by referees’ reports and author responses. Let’s go!!!!

Anyone (wanna) study(ing) this as a natural experiment? 🙃

#Metascience #SciSci #TransparentScience
June 19, 2025 at 7:36 AM Everybody can reply
11 likes
Maybe you missed it, but science died 3 years ago..”Dead science theory”?

#SciSci #ScAISci #metasci
June 19, 2025 at 6:11 AM Everybody can reply
2 reposts 4 likes
Today, my dear colleague @annameret.bsky.social presented our work on data sharing in psychology at @icssi.bsky.social ✨We show that open data is findable, but less reusable.
Preprint coming soon, preregistration available on PsychArchives: doi.org/10.23668/psy...

#Metascience #SciSci #ICSSI2025
June 16, 2025 at 4:03 PM Everybody can reply
5 reposts 1 quotes 14 likes
"科学者の「生産性」は何によって決まるのか? 優れた研究を生むのはどのようなチームか? 論文の「インパクト」の差はなぜ生まれるのか? 『科学』そのものを『科学する』、新たな知の地平を切り拓く入門書"

Dashun Wang, Albert-László Barabási/ 三浦崇寛, 松井暉, 浅谷公威, 坂田一郎, 神楽坂やちま 監修/ SciSci翻訳委員会 訳 『サイエンス・オブ・サイエンス』
comingbook.honzuki.jp?detail=97846...
『サイエンス・オブ・サイエンス』
科学者の「生産性」は何によって決まるのか?<br>優れた研究を生むのはどのようなチームか?<b...
comingbook.honzuki.jp
June 5, 2025 at 8:29 AM Everybody can reply
3 likes
The spillover from events like this extends beyond a single paper. When a high-profile study like this is withdrawn, especially one that was widely discussed and covered, it has broader implications. This study had an Altmetric score of over 130.

#retractions #SciSci #attention #AI

🧵 1/4
June 4, 2025 at 5:00 PM Everybody can reply
5 reposts 1 quotes 9 likes
Case in point the increasing prevalence of puzzle-solving & mop-up work around “Can GPT do X”. Has a “general purpose” instrument ever in the history become such a wide-spread object of study, disrupting what gets studied, who gets to & how?

#ScAISci #SciSci #ScienceOfAIMediatedScience #AI4Science
May 31, 2025 at 2:18 AM Everybody can reply
1 likes
Can #AI outperform scientists-in-training?

3 researchers (post-doctoral, doctoral, or post-doctoral) and #SciSciGPT completed #research tasks (e.g., #stats, #dataViz).

3 postdocs assessed their work.

The #LLM performed better; it took 10% as much time.

doi.org/10.48550/arX...
April 18, 2025 at 7:13 PM Everybody can reply
1 likes