#Peer-#Feedback
LightNews LightNews
joshkunnath.bsky.social
Check out my new post on peer feedback: The potential impact, keys to success, and practical implementation steps.
Learning Out Loud: The Potential Impact of Peer Feedback and Steps to Get Started
Nice work! fix ur spelling Overall, looks pretty good🙂 This makes no sense!? These are some examples of peer feedback I've seen and heard in my ELA classroom. They include a mixture of broad praise, editing suggestions, vague affirmations, and the occasional empty criticism. I'd like to say this only happened in my early years of teaching and that I haven't heard anything like it in years, but that wouldn't be completely true.
joshkunnath.com
February 16, 2026 at 9:46 PM
opietasanimi.com
I had students produce podcasts for their midterm projects, and they'll collaborate to make group podcasts for their final projects. peer feedback is part of the grade, so they listen and comment on each other's work, replicating group discussion format of class sessions. it's been great!
February 16, 2026 at 8:53 PM
jovanevery.bsky.social
You did not submit inferior work. Peer review is an editorial process. Editorial feedback improves your work.

You are probably right that we don’t talk about this enough. I hope your revisions go well.
February 16, 2026 at 8:24 PM
digiresacademy.bsky.social
DEADLINE EXTENDED!
Applications for DRA Train-the-Trainer #8 are open until Feb 20 (midnight CET) 🎉
Part 1 (March): Didactics, evidence-based training & peer-teaching
Part 2 (Apr–Jul): Teach your own course, get feedback & publish
Apply now
buff.ly/l9eEPjF
February 16, 2026 at 4:41 PM
lyamgtt.bsky.social
Hey Game Devs! 🌸
I'm Lya a cozy game dev, my objective is to try out as many demo as possible during the Steam Next Fest!
If your indie game is participating and you want a peer feedback, don't hesitate to drop your demo link bellow ✨🚀
#SteamNextFest #NextFest #indiegames
February 16, 2026 at 3:06 PM
curiositasjournal.bsky.social
Text: Charlotte Ashley. Peer-Review Coordinator. Charlotte ensures a fair, prompt, and constructive review process. She recruits and liaises with peer reviewers, matches submissions to appropriate reviewers based on their expertise, manages timelines for reviewer feedback, communicates with authors, and upholds ethical standards in reviews, including confidentiality and fairness. Text: Lowen Frampton-Thorburn. Creative Editor. Lowen is responsible for shaping the aesthetic and creative aspects of the journal. They ensure visual consistency and thoughtful layout across the journal, work on design and formatting (print-ready and digital), and collaborate with authors submitting more visual essays, poetry, or artwork. They also contribute to theme development from a visual or creative-critical angle. Text: Lowen Frampton-Thorburn. Publishing Coordinator. Lowen is also the Publishing Coordinator and ensures that the journal and its contents adhere to publishing standards and university requirements. This role includes liaising with YSJ Library services on issues around Licensing, Copyright, Indexing, ISSN and Metrics. Text: Sophie Day. Communications Officer. Sophie D. is the voice of the journal, both internally and externally. She manages announcements, social media, and outreach, promotes calls for papers and publication launches, coordinates with authors and the YSJ Marketing and Communication teams regarding inclusivity and accessibility, and helps build an audience across student and academic communities.
February 16, 2026 at 1:57 PM
micefearboggis.bsky.social
Peer review gets a lot of kudos, but often it's the feedback we get direct from people we know and trust before a paper is even submitted that feels like it has the most significant impact on our work. These people usually show up in the acknowledgements, where they get almost no recognition at all.
February 16, 2026 at 12:41 PM
charitycomms.bsky.social
Building confidence in charity comms can feel difficult, especially early in your career. Here are some practical ways to build confidence over time.

Senior comms pros – what helped you grow confidence in your early career? What advice would you give to your younger self? Share in the comments.
Practical ways to build confidence, including: 1. Reflect on wins, big and small - Take a moment each week to recognise and celebrate your achievements, whether that’s good feedback on a project, making progress on an objective, or knowing you handled a piece of work with care. 2. Seek mentoring relationships - Connect with a mentor or trusted peer who can offer guidance, feedback and support. Having someone to talk things through with can make challenges feel more manageable and growth more visible. Practical ways to build confidence, including: 3. Focus on your own progress - It's natural to compare yourself to others, but it's rarely helpful. Instead, look at how far you’ve come, what you’ve learned, and the contribution you’re making in your role. 4. Share your ideas and insights - When you contribute to discussions or share your observations, you’re demonstrating the value you bring. Over time, this helps build confidence in your voice and judgement.
February 16, 2026 at 12:16 PM
pvrinstitute.bsky.social
Applications are now open 🚀

We’ve launched the Pulmonary Circulation Gateway Programme!
A new 12-month peer-review mentoring pilot for Early Career Professionals in PH.

Gain hands-on reviewing experience and personalised feedback.

➡️ Find out more: pvrinstitute.org/learning-and...
February 16, 2026 at 10:15 AM
startupideas.bsky.social
startup idea: automated code review for open-source projects with peer feedback scoring
February 16, 2026 at 5:11 AM
jamescheung.bsky.social
Interesting concept! What specific features do you think would be most valuable for introverted students in that peer feedback simulation?
February 14, 2026 at 5:15 PM
startupideas.bsky.social
startup idea: automated code review tool that simulates peer feedback for introverted students
February 14, 2026 at 4:59 PM
infosecsherpa.bsky.social
"Voice of the Customer for Network Security Microsegmentation" - Download the Gartner® Peer Insights™ Report from Zero Networks! The report summarizes feedback from verified end users who have implemented microsegmentation solutions in production environments. api.cyfluencer.com/s/gartner-vo...
A dark blue promotional graphic for Zero Networks featuring the headline "Gartner Peer Insights Voice of the Customer for Network Security Microsegmentation Report." On the left is an orange "Download" button, and on the right is a tablet displaying a digital version of the report containing charts and data.
February 14, 2026 at 4:01 PM
amanwriter.bsky.social
If you want to try the 'Phone-as-a-Bat' tech yourself, both games are free to play in the browser here:

⚾️ Designation Hitter: amanmathur.itch.io/designation-...
🏏 CricFit: amanmathur.itch.io/cricfit

Use smartphone on same WiFi network for low peer-to-peer latency. Would love feedback from you!
February 13, 2026 at 7:25 PM
adambrandt.bsky.social
This is going to save a lot of academics a lot of time when writing feedback for peer reviews and student essays.
katemckean.bsky.social Kate McKean @katemckean.bsky.social · 5d
Over on threads someone just use ai;dr and we all need to adopt that right quick
February 13, 2026 at 3:41 PM
startupideas.bsky.social
startup idea: android app for peer-to-peer mobile code reviews with automated feedback and issue tracking
February 13, 2026 at 1:14 PM
nikaradziun.bsky.social
Attention fellow Donders Postdocs!

💡 Got an idea you want to develop? Join Postdoc Ponders – Idea lab: From spark to launch, and turn it into action with peer feedback and practical tools.

🗓️ Thursday, February 19, 2026, 15:00–17:00
📍 Trigon, Red Room

More info 👉 www.ru.nl/en/donders-i...
February 12, 2026 at 4:01 PM
cscl-bot.bsky.social
Sukannya Purkayastha, Qile Wan, Anne Lauscher, Lizhen Qu, Iryna Gurevych: Reviewing the Reviewer: Elevating Peer Review Quality through LLM-Guided Feedback https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10118 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.10118 https://arxiv.org/html/2602.10118
February 12, 2026 at 6:29 AM
ppallo.bsky.social
I know norms are breaking down all around us, but you can't put "Comes across like Mango, if Chris Kattan was a less charismatic and talented performer" in a peer-to-peer feedback form. You have to at least gesture your critique is about my job, and not my "whole thing".
February 11, 2026 at 10:37 PM
jimiadams.bsky.social
Today I received a request for feedback about Elsevier's "contributions" to the peer review system. Detailed completion of that was, let's say, cathartic.
February 11, 2026 at 5:24 PM
kurtschwehr.bsky.social
A new article for my reading list: "A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings"

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Gemini gen checklist: 1. Is it Accountable? Integrity * Oversight: Approved by an ethical board (IRB/IACUC)? * Disclosures: Funding sources and conflicts of interest clearly stated? * Corrections: Clear policy for correcting errors rather than hiding them? 2. Is it Evaluable? Transparency * Openness: Raw data, code, and detailed methods available for scrutiny? * Reproducibility: Is there enough detail to repeat the experiment exactly? * Access: Open Access? 3. Is it Well-Formulated? Design * Pre-registration: Hypothesis defined before data collection/p-hacking? * Fit: Study design appropriate for the specific question asked? * Context: Boundaries of where findings apply clear? 4. Has it been Evaluated? Review * Peer Review: Has it undergone independent expert review? * Community Feedback: Shared as a preprint or at conferences? * Replication: Have independent labs successfully replicated these findings? 5. Does it Control Bias? (Objectivity) * Safeguards: Did the study use randomization and blinding/masking to prevent bias? * Reporting: Did they report *all* results, including negative or "boring" findings? * Credibility: Are qualitative interpretations checked against participant perspectives? 6. Does it Reduce Error? Rigor * Power: Was the sample size large enough to support the conclusions? * **Calibration:** Were the instruments and methods valid and reliable? * **Self-Correction:** Did the authors actively try to find and root out their own errors? 7. Are Claims Warranted? (Evidence) * Alignment: Do the conclusions match the data without exaggeration? * Humility: Are limitations and uncertainties explicitly acknowledged? * Generalization: Do they avoid applying findings to populations not represented in the sample? The "Proxy" Trap * Journal Reputation: High "Impact Factor" does not guarantee truth. * Author Fame: Prestige does not prevent error or bias. * Novelty: "Groundbreaking" results are often riskier and less reliable than incremental science.
February 11, 2026 at 4:51 PM
heroicendeavour.bsky.social
When I taught Wikipedia editing, I used to do a ‘speed dating’ peer review exercise where the students would all review each other’s WIP articles - it worked great, the students enjoyed it, and the feedback was always on point.
February 11, 2026 at 11:49 AM
timeshighered.bsky.social
Harness the power of your academic community to hone your arguments, sharpen your #writing and develop your critical thinking: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/peer-feedback-secret-weapon-better-academic-writing #Academia #HigherEd #AcademicSky #EduSky
Peer feedback is the secret weapon for better academic writing
Harness the power of your academic community to hone your arguments, sharpen your writing and develop your critical thinking
www.timeshighereducation.com
February 11, 2026 at 11:13 AM
cryotud.bsky.social
Does BioRxix not already allow you/us to do exactly that? Indexed repository, version-controlled updates, transparent options for peer feedback and author replies. Each version can have updated author contributions to document individual contributions.
February 11, 2026 at 10:44 AM