Guy with a beard and opinions
@whowhatnow56.bsky.social
Nihilistic TV/Film professional with tons of opinions rife with detached irony. Extremely annoying. He/him/they/can’t wait to hear that one joke
I would say choosing to participate in that role is cowardice
November 15, 2025 at 5:07 PM
I would say choosing to participate in that role is cowardice
If you think they should ban everyone who breaks the ToS, then you should be over there telling the mod team that they should ban Jesse Singal and the government accounts who regularly break ToS but aren’t banned.
That’s what you’d do if you actually believed that.
That’s what you’d do if you actually believed that.
November 15, 2025 at 4:05 PM
If you think they should ban everyone who breaks the ToS, then you should be over there telling the mod team that they should ban Jesse Singal and the government accounts who regularly break ToS but aren’t banned.
That’s what you’d do if you actually believed that.
That’s what you’d do if you actually believed that.
So why aren’t you over there telling Aaron to ban Jesse Singal and all the government accounts, Sarah? Why are you here defending them against the victims of the accounts Aaron protects?
November 15, 2025 at 3:49 PM
So why aren’t you over there telling Aaron to ban Jesse Singal and all the government accounts, Sarah? Why are you here defending them against the victims of the accounts Aaron protects?
Considering they sided repeatedly with Jesse Singal over the people he has harmed (and be sure to look up what he’s said about teenagers and adults having sex!), you might want to delete this very ignorant response.
November 15, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Considering they sided repeatedly with Jesse Singal over the people he has harmed (and be sure to look up what he’s said about teenagers and adults having sex!), you might want to delete this very ignorant response.
Who were you referring to as “we” when you said “we let MAGA dictate the platform”?
November 15, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Who were you referring to as “we” when you said “we let MAGA dictate the platform”?
This would require Dems to have a spine and be unafraid of the republican backlash. Unfortunately, Dems are cowards who are scared to lose their cushy do nothing gigs
November 15, 2025 at 2:16 PM
This would require Dems to have a spine and be unafraid of the republican backlash. Unfortunately, Dems are cowards who are scared to lose their cushy do nothing gigs
It would awesome if he actually advocated for healthcare for all like maybe help out the NNU who has been chasing that in every state. But incredibly he’s never done shit for them
November 15, 2025 at 2:12 PM
It would awesome if he actually advocated for healthcare for all like maybe help out the NNU who has been chasing that in every state. But incredibly he’s never done shit for them
Good. Your point is stupid and is how we ended up with Trump. You’re just a conservative who refuses to admit it.
November 15, 2025 at 2:04 PM
Good. Your point is stupid and is how we ended up with Trump. You’re just a conservative who refuses to admit it.
lol it’s just the krassensteins isn’t it?
November 15, 2025 at 2:00 PM
lol it’s just the krassensteins isn’t it?
He’s a bigoted asshole who is anti-abortion. There are millions of people who are better candidates lmao. Have standards my god
November 15, 2025 at 1:59 PM
He’s a bigoted asshole who is anti-abortion. There are millions of people who are better candidates lmao. Have standards my god
We still doing “phrasing”?
November 14, 2025 at 7:41 PM
We still doing “phrasing”?
Yes. Every single day
November 14, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Yes. Every single day
Reposted by Guy with a beard and opinions
No — this is the insularity of people at the Times thinking that *outsiders* have the wrong view of investigative culture at the NYT. It's actually the _internal_ view that's wrong. The outside view, that standards are inconsistent and driven by agendas, is demonstrably the case...
November 13, 2025 at 5:40 PM
No — this is the insularity of people at the Times thinking that *outsiders* have the wrong view of investigative culture at the NYT. It's actually the _internal_ view that's wrong. The outside view, that standards are inconsistent and driven by agendas, is demonstrably the case...
Do you honestly believe the Clintons are opposed to those policies?
November 13, 2025 at 10:28 PM
Do you honestly believe the Clintons are opposed to those policies?
Half of these are criticizing Comey once again, none of them go into about what the Clinton’s do when they weaponize their foundation for exploitation of developing or recently damaged nations.
November 13, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Half of these are criticizing Comey once again, none of them go into about what the Clinton’s do when they weaponize their foundation for exploitation of developing or recently damaged nations.
That’s pretty silly considering Hillary is from Chicago and went to Wellesley and Yale Law School. Those are both elite institutions in the New York try state area. Shes been friends with many of the NYTimes editors and even the owners lmao. Tf are you on about?
November 13, 2025 at 9:42 PM
That’s pretty silly considering Hillary is from Chicago and went to Wellesley and Yale Law School. Those are both elite institutions in the New York try state area. Shes been friends with many of the NYTimes editors and even the owners lmao. Tf are you on about?
Do… do you think this helps the argument the NYTimes has it out for the Clinton’s when they refuse to report on the truly repugnant things they’re doing?
November 13, 2025 at 9:37 PM
Do… do you think this helps the argument the NYTimes has it out for the Clinton’s when they refuse to report on the truly repugnant things they’re doing?
I’m with you until the end. The Clintons are legitimately terrible people, especially Bill. He’s a sexual predator who uses his foundation as a well to help business exploit the communities he claims to be helping. www.currentaffairs.org/news/2016/11...
What The Clintons Did To Haiti
Their actions in the country were shameful and shouldn’t be defended…
www.currentaffairs.org
November 13, 2025 at 5:42 PM
I’m with you until the end. The Clintons are legitimately terrible people, especially Bill. He’s a sexual predator who uses his foundation as a well to help business exploit the communities he claims to be helping. www.currentaffairs.org/news/2016/11...
The subject line is pretty telling
November 13, 2025 at 2:08 PM
The subject line is pretty telling
PEPFAR, a US government program, was giving 100x the amount of money for AIDS eradication and actually doing that while the Clinton’s got in with countries to help their rich buddies exploit it. www.currentaffairs.org/news/2016/11...
What The Clintons Did To Haiti
Their actions in the country were shameful and shouldn’t be defended…
www.currentaffairs.org
November 13, 2025 at 2:08 PM
PEPFAR, a US government program, was giving 100x the amount of money for AIDS eradication and actually doing that while the Clinton’s got in with countries to help their rich buddies exploit it. www.currentaffairs.org/news/2016/11...
He was spotted at the Lolita island several times by a victim and employees. He’s a known sexual predator who targets young, vulnerable women he has power over.
Also, the Clintons were not traveling around the world to eradicate AIDS, they were setting up political influence operations
Also, the Clintons were not traveling around the world to eradicate AIDS, they were setting up political influence operations
November 13, 2025 at 2:05 PM
He was spotted at the Lolita island several times by a victim and employees. He’s a known sexual predator who targets young, vulnerable women he has power over.
Also, the Clintons were not traveling around the world to eradicate AIDS, they were setting up political influence operations
Also, the Clintons were not traveling around the world to eradicate AIDS, they were setting up political influence operations
No, a special prosecutor brought charges against Trump in two separate districts, 3 years later, one which was ruled unconstitutional, and the other allowed the clock to run out until the election. Garland objectively and factually did not prosecute Trump.
November 12, 2025 at 10:32 PM
No, a special prosecutor brought charges against Trump in two separate districts, 3 years later, one which was ruled unconstitutional, and the other allowed the clock to run out until the election. Garland objectively and factually did not prosecute Trump.
It’s extremely stupid and historically ignorant to think that a conservative Supreme Court would go easy on Dems. And no, there are several Dem lawmakers right now failing to follow disclosure rules without consequence as well as Republicans. It is one of the biggest bipartisan issues
November 12, 2025 at 10:29 PM
It’s extremely stupid and historically ignorant to think that a conservative Supreme Court would go easy on Dems. And no, there are several Dem lawmakers right now failing to follow disclosure rules without consequence as well as Republicans. It is one of the biggest bipartisan issues
They did not. A special prosecutor did on a bad mandate that got shot down. What I and loads of experts were saying Garland could do was just do it all himself without a special prosecutor 3 years later.
November 12, 2025 at 7:36 PM
They did not. A special prosecutor did on a bad mandate that got shot down. What I and loads of experts were saying Garland could do was just do it all himself without a special prosecutor 3 years later.