Gah you've already gone & posted the optimum choice.

Throwing us under the bus

Incredibly, I think there are. Steph from translucent for starters.

Maybe it'll just be her in the segregated petting zoo where the real women to go & grace their inferiors with their presence.

The burning question here is why the fuck are there are trans women still in the labour party?

Trans kids are *right now* on the NHS being put thru the conversion practise 'watchful waiting' - endless assessments that go nowhere while denying healthcare/social transition in the hope they'll give up & decide to be 'normal'.

Shame they can't do something about the NHS putting trans kids thru conversion practises *right now* eh?

Oh yeah - the BBC actively participated in cooking up a moral panic about their healthcare.

The past is important but what about what's happening - & being ignored - RIGHT NOW?

There is already a system in place to establish eligibility to work & no indications it doesn't function.

Beyond that, if anyone wants to work, good luck to them.
The whole concept of "illegal working" is ridiculous.
You lot are always either blaming ppl for working & calling ppl skivers.

I honestly do not understand what this drama is all about, but I apologise if I have genuinely upset you.

None of this is important or worth the fuss.

Peace.

The fact you perceive having an actually very minor disagreement about something that was *in no conceivable way of a personal nature* as 'having a pop' is...look, saying "I disagree about this point" is not a personal attack.

*You're* the one sowing dischord here. I just gave my opinion which - this being social media - I do all the time - without saying pls miss, unworthy as I am may I be permitted to reply to your post?

*You* decided you wanted a big drama b/c how dare I contradict you.

Get over yourself.

It's social media love. If you don't want responses lest they precipitate an attack of the vapours when somebody dares contradict your sage opinions then limit replies & cultivate a suitably sycophantic followers list.

And if you don't want an argument, don't have one.

By firing posts at me I mean you've sent me lots of replies.
Then complained when I've responded to them.
And complained about my arguing with you. While you're engaged in an argument w/me.

You have literally zero self awareness.

This is what you said. There in black & white.
Now you're saying something a bit different.
Perhaps I misinterpreted your meaning. If I have you could have simply pointed that out. But no. We instead get this Big Performance.

For clarity, I took the quote from here
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
It just doesn't sit with the "trans women are women" stuff.

But as w/GG, there was nothing to stop them saying "we urgently call on the UK govt to act to safeguard the rights of trans ppl.
So why haven't they?

Yeah it's incongruous w/the rest of the 'we're so so sorry' statements they've been making.

I don't know what to make of it.

Very telling quote from WI head.

Taken at face value it implies she feels it's WI's responsibility to be at the vanguard of trans exclusion. Is that the case? Or is she conveying more what those that have pushed them are trying to do.
To force societal change with or without guidance.

You've a bigger profile so you'll attract more ppl taking out their frustrations on you, more ppl thinking they know better & more outright trolls.
But all the ppl who deeply value & appreciate your work are still out there.

Just out of interest what was his argument?