✨Build products people love to use
Smart tech isn’t enough. Clean UI isn’t enough
If users don’t understand or trust your product — they won’t stick around
Here are the most common UX gaps (with fixes) 👇
“Trust me, bro” is not a product strategy.
If your AI chat can’t cite sources, you’re not building an assistant, you’re building a liability.
“Trust me, bro” is not a product strategy.
If your AI chat can’t cite sources, you’re not building an assistant, you’re building a liability.
But here’s the truth 👇
If users can’t trust your AI’s answers, they churn faster than you can say “hallucination”
But here’s the truth 👇
If users can’t trust your AI’s answers, they churn faster than you can say “hallucination”
That’s why they don’t pay.
Most AI startups don’t lose customers because they’re “too expensive”
They lose them because pricing feels unpredictable and confusing 👇
That’s why they don’t pay.
Most AI startups don’t lose customers because they’re “too expensive”
They lose them because pricing feels unpredictable and confusing 👇
If you can’t explain why this tool, not that one, you won’t close the deal.
Auditability isn’t enterprise polish—it’s table stakes.
If you can’t explain why this tool, not that one, you won’t close the deal.
Auditability isn’t enterprise polish—it’s table stakes.
Most founders chase acquisition.
But users don’t drop off because you can’t find them.
They drop off because you can’t activate them.
Here’s how to close the Activation Gap and turn first-timers into repeat users 👇
Most founders chase acquisition.
But users don’t drop off because you can’t find them.
They drop off because you can’t activate them.
Here’s how to close the Activation Gap and turn first-timers into repeat users 👇
Because now you’re paying twice:
1️⃣ To acquire the user
2️⃣ To win back their trust
First-run reliability isn’t polish—it’s survival.
Because now you’re paying twice:
1️⃣ To acquire the user
2️⃣ To win back their trust
First-run reliability isn’t polish—it’s survival.
It’s not. It’s survival.
Most AI products don’t fail because of tech.
They fail because users never see the value in their first session 👇
It’s not. It’s survival.
Most AI products don’t fail because of tech.
They fail because users never see the value in their first session 👇
Retention = first win UX
Retention = first win UX
If users don’t get a “first win,” they won’t come back
If users don’t get a “first win,” they won’t come back
But here’s the truth: The biggest problems aren’t new at all. They’re the same old UX failures, just translated into AI
But here’s the truth: The biggest problems aren’t new at all. They’re the same old UX failures, just translated into AI
Be careful when testing ideas or doing research:
– Don’t lead with your favorite concept
– Avoid “loading” questions
– Randomize the order in surveys
Good UX starts with clear thinking
Be careful when testing ideas or doing research:
– Don’t lead with your favorite concept
– Avoid “loading” questions
– Randomize the order in surveys
Good UX starts with clear thinking
Smart tech isn’t enough. Clean UI isn’t enough
If users don’t understand or trust your product — they won’t stick around
Here are the most common UX gaps (with fixes) 👇
Smart tech isn’t enough. Clean UI isn’t enough
If users don’t understand or trust your product — they won’t stick around
Here are the most common UX gaps (with fixes) 👇
To help users discover your product’s value:
– Surface key features when they’re most relevant
– Use tooltips or guided flows
– Repeat exposure over time
To help users discover your product’s value:
– Surface key features when they’re most relevant
– Use tooltips or guided flows
– Repeat exposure over time
👀 That’s anchoring bias: the first number they see sets their expectations
To guide decisions better:
Start your pricing table with the highest plan — then show your “most popular” one.
👀 That’s anchoring bias: the first number they see sets their expectations
To guide decisions better:
Start your pricing table with the highest plan — then show your “most popular” one.
❌ No consent flow? Users bounce.
❌ No safety toggles? No trust.
✅ Transparency
✅ Control
✅ Clarity
✨ Good UX = safer, smoother, more trustworthy products
❌ No consent flow? Users bounce.
❌ No safety toggles? No trust.
✅ Transparency
✅ Control
✅ Clarity
✨ Good UX = safer, smoother, more trustworthy products
It might not be your product. It might be your UX:
❌ Confusing paths
❌ Hidden value
❌ Messy language
💡 People don’t leave bad tools — they leave unclear ones
✨ Clarity keeps users around
It might not be your product. It might be your UX:
❌ Confusing paths
❌ Hidden value
❌ Messy language
💡 People don’t leave bad tools — they leave unclear ones
✨ Clarity keeps users around
These aren’t bugs. They’re experience gaps that silently ruin activation, retention, and trust.
Let’s break down each one 👇
These aren’t bugs. They’re experience gaps that silently ruin activation, retention, and trust.
Let’s break down each one 👇
Users don’t need to see everything. They need to succeed — once.
✅ One clear task
✅ One fast result
✅ One “I did it!” moment
✨ Design onboarding around momentum, not menus
Users don’t need to see everything. They need to succeed — once.
✅ One clear task
✅ One fast result
✅ One “I did it!” moment
✨ Design onboarding around momentum, not menus
It’s not just a retention issue. It’s a UX issue:
❌ No clear next step
😵💫 Overwhelming choices
💬 Features with zero context
✨ Activation = a guided path, not a grand reveal
It’s not just a retention issue. It’s a UX issue:
❌ No clear next step
😵💫 Overwhelming choices
💬 Features with zero context
✨ Activation = a guided path, not a grand reveal