ubermitch.bsky.social
@ubermitch.bsky.social
just a simple lawyer from a sleepy border town he/him
you just have to keep in mind E.B. White's explanation; it's just a matter of a contextually narrowing definition
November 26, 2025 at 11:12 PM
here's CD Cal LR 83-8
November 26, 2025 at 4:55 PM
if money was no object and it was possible to buy this place in my neighborhood, wouldn't it be awesome
November 25, 2025 at 8:21 PM
hey Chris, did you see plaintiff's filing this AM in JGG re proposed contempt procedures? the proposed witness list is spicy!
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
November 25, 2025 at 4:46 PM
November 25, 2025 at 3:32 PM
there's good evidence he was insane well before he was rich
archive.is/202308241600...
November 25, 2025 at 2:55 AM
I must have seen "Homer the Vigilante" like three dozen times before I saw It's A Mad Mad Mad Mad World so I was weirdly familiar with it going in
November 25, 2025 at 2:39 AM
here we are; the fourth circuit looks around the middle of the pack speed-wise, with the median appeal taking 10.0 months
www.uscourts.gov/sites/defaul...
November 25, 2025 at 12:54 AM
in the last 12-month period for which stats are available, 740 people were indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia
www.uscourts.gov/sites/defaul...
November 24, 2025 at 6:01 PM
the bit about vertical-landing spacecraft reminded me of how the shock absorbers in the legs of the Apollo lunar module were single-use, designed to take just one landing
www.nasa.gov/wp-content/u...
November 22, 2025 at 6:26 PM
I suppose that's where Paddy Chayefsky was back in 1976
November 21, 2025 at 5:13 PM
This bit isn’t just failing to argue Harris was wrong, it’s confirming she was accurate
November 21, 2025 at 3:24 PM
apt!
November 21, 2025 at 12:47 AM
actually wait; this was decided by a three-judge panel in the District Court, meaning it is directly appealable to the Supreme Court as a matter of right (i.e. they get to skip the Court of Appeals entirely and don't need to petition for certiorari; the Supreme Court is obligated to take the case)
November 18, 2025 at 8:50 PM
because it's in the Fifth Amendment, and it's generally easier to amend state constitutions versus the federal one
November 18, 2025 at 3:39 AM
far from the most notable misstatement here but FDR rather famously *didn't* pack the Supreme Court
November 18, 2025 at 3:16 AM
also, "repeal the 15th Amendment" is, uhh, something
November 18, 2025 at 2:38 AM
I don't think that's accurate; note the "unilateral" in there
casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/gloss...
November 17, 2025 at 8:36 PM
just showing the math here
November 17, 2025 at 8:16 PM
let's post this pic now!
(I'm posting this as some who grew up in Rhode Island, which while having a cultural closeness to Massachusetts, is all sorts of fucked up in its own unique ways)
November 16, 2025 at 10:14 AM
translated version, which I will trust with no further inquiry
rarehistoricalphotos.com/sketches-sov...
November 15, 2025 at 9:08 PM
good a place as any to post the old Soviet Ethnicity Chart
November 15, 2025 at 9:02 PM
jfc this long-ass history to come after Van Deerlin
November 15, 2025 at 6:11 AM
the finest historical precedent is the tenth article of impeachment against Andrew Johnson
teachingamericanhistory.org/document/art...
November 14, 2025 at 11:43 PM
okay, figured out how to find the opinion and now see fn 1; you would think something pretending to be a real court would appoint counsel or something to ensure an actual adversarial process before issuing a precedential opinion, but here we are
November 14, 2025 at 6:38 PM